Cars For The World

Mongu commission’s recommendations are not mine alone-Rodger Chongwe

Time Posted: March 1, 2012 12:47 pm
Dr Rodger Chongwe

Dr Rodger Chongwe

Rodger Chongwe has fought back to put the record straight in the wake of a Wynter Kabimba dressing down on Monday. The Patriotic Front secretary general, in a television interview with veteran broadcaster Frank Mutubila, did not mince his words when he referred to the chairman of the Mongu riots commission of inquiry as an interested party in the matter.

Dr Chongwe’s commission proposed in its report that the 1964 Barotseland Agreement should be restored to which the PF chief charged that the commission went beyond its terms of reference. Dr Chongwe yesterday said Mr Kabimba should not accuse him of being an interested party in the matter because he was not the only lawyer representing the victims of the Mongu riots.

He said he was merely the lead counsel, voluntarily representing 26 people who were charged with treason after the riots.

Dr Chongwe said Mr Kabimba was in fact one of the lawyers who had equally volunteered to represent the accused.

He punched further: “Mr Kabimba is very much alive to the fact that there was no money attached and therefore, there would be no emotional attachment.”

He added, proudly: “As a Senior or Queen’s Counsel in that matter, I did not receive any money and in fact the matter was never argued in court as the case was withdrawn.”

He even added that his commission was within its terms of reference to recommend the restoration of the Barotseland Agreement.

“There is no evidence that we went beyond the terms of reference which the head of State gave us and besides, we have not yet been told by the appointing authority and Cabinet that we went beyond our mandate,” Dr Chongwe said.

Mr Kabimba, in an interview on Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC) had goaded Dr Chongwe, saying he was emotionally involved in the matter as he was one of the lawyers who represented some of the victims of the Mongu riots.

The commission presented its findings to President Sata last Thursday, and the President said he would be reluctant to restore the Barotseland Agreement.

And on Monday Mr Kabimba added a rejoinder: “The issue of the Barotseland Agreement is nowhere in the terms of reference as given to the commission by President Sata.”

To which Dr Chongwe retorted yesterday in an interview: “We have done the work and it’s up to the authority to accept or reject the recommendations,” and that, “there’s no question that one must bear the blame but it’s really best that we wait for Government to state its position.”

He said the role of the commission was only to make recommendations and the decision to accept or reject the report lies with the appointing authority, who in this case is the President. He said the recommendations are not binding and can easily be dismissed if Cabinet and the President felt so.

Dr Chongwe also said the recommendations are not his alone and that it is wrong to attribute the recommendations of the commission to his persona, as there were nine other commissioners.

“Yes, I was and I am still the chairperson of the commission but the decisions and recommendations were not for Rodger Chongwe. All the nine commissioners collectively made the decisions,” he said.

He was speaking from Luangwa.

45 Comments

  1. vote
    flag Zedian says: Zedian
    March 1, 2012 at 12:58 pm |

    Its a waste of breath to respond to Wynter Kabimba. He is not the President and neither is he in the Cabinet. Let him produce the ERB COI report. What is he waiting for? 

    Reply
  2. vote
    flag GUNDIX says: GUNDIX
    March 1, 2012 at 1:00 pm |

    Kabimba is wrong by attacking Chongwe.

    If he knew that Chongwe had interest in the matter, why was he scared to tell President Sata not to appoint Chongwe?

    Is he seeing Chongwe as a threat to his political career prospects?

    Kabimba should have been wise enough to speak to his President prior to issuing a statement that contradicts the appointing authority’s trust and confidence.
    Therefore, Kabimba must withdraw his statement, which clearly shows that he is an interested party in this matter.

    Reply
  3. vote
    flag The Engineer (Australia) says: The Engineer (Australia)
    March 1, 2012 at 1:03 pm |

    Chongwe you should have continued to stay with us here in Australia. You are dealing with monkeys and the more you deal with them, the more you will also look like a monkey

    Reply
    1. vote
      flag WM says: WM
      March 1, 2012 at 1:58 pm |

      Hey if you seem to be very happy in australia, why are you bothered about what is happening in Zambia? answer is that you care and would love to be back in Zambia but you can’t cut it back home. Please you get involve with politics there in australia you some much love and let us who care about mother Zambia be.

    2. vote
      flag Mungoni says: Mungoni
      March 1, 2012 at 3:40 pm |

      you bitch ass nigga with no brains, how racist you are. How do you call humans that name. you think we are monkeys. you and your whole lot are nomadic monkeys

  4. vote
    flag Chalikale says: Chalikale
    March 1, 2012 at 1:29 pm |

    #3 no need to insult the nation. Mr Chongwe congratulation for the mature manner in which you have responded Mr. Kabimba’s needless attacks. We need such kindl of level headedness. To Mr. Kabimba, I would like to say that there was no need for such personal attack on Mr. Chongwe. You did not need to go out of your way nd pay ZNBC just to put accross your personal view. Zambian are intelligent and you do not need to think for them.

    Reply
  5. vote
    flag Kudya Nikusheta says: Kudya Nikusheta
    March 1, 2012 at 1:41 pm |

    @ 3 u guys never amuse me on fast u forget that u are actually zambians,and now bcoz u have tasted Australian waters u have the balls to insult the sons of the soil,I am in the diaspora just like and am probably doing way better than u but I care about what happens back and I will go back just Roger Chongwe did too bad u wont coz I would want to grill chaps like u…

    contribute without insults and dont take sides when dealing with issues of national interest.

    Reply
  6. vote
    flag Nine Chale says: Nine Chale
    March 1, 2012 at 1:48 pm |

    Good afternoon

    If the sole aim of the commission was to make recommendations and nothing more, then why should Dr. Chongwe bring out a proposal to restore the Barotseland Agreement again?

    According to my judgement, the Barotseland Agreement remains to be the most complex and explosive issue of our time and therefore requires to be handled with utmost sensitivity and neutrality. 100% Professionalism, 0% Emotionalism! We need people with enough depth and breadth of knowledge to establish truth and bring out profound solutions to the matter. Reconcilitaion should be the way forward and not exciting emotions.

    Reply
    1. vote
      flag WM says: WM
      March 1, 2012 at 2:05 pm |

      God, whats wrong with you people. Restoration of BA64 is one of the recommendations in the report and it does not mean Dr Chongwe wants it restored. No just one of the issues that the commission has listed as areas the govt should assess following the issues in WP 

    2. vote
      flag Kusogolo says: Kusogolo
      March 1, 2012 at 6:01 pm |

      Nine Chale what do you understand by the term Recommendation? The People of Barotse land have always argued that the problems that stem from that side are becoz of the abrogation of the BA64. So what wld the COI recommend in that regard?

    3. vote
      flag Sharp Shooter says: Sharp Shooter
      March 2, 2012 at 7:54 am |

      recommendation pls..googl it!

  7. vote
    flag Mad Bemba colonizer of Zambia says: Mad Bemba colonizer of Zambia
    March 1, 2012 at 1:58 pm |

    Basopo! The British high commissioner have even joined in , saying BA64 is about uniting then Northern Rhodesia and Barotseland period. But not want Govt says dividing.

    Reply
  8. vote
    flag THE POACHER says: THE POACHER
    March 1, 2012 at 2:49 pm |

    Roger, you have made yourself clear, actually more than clear.It’s only stupid Kabimba who is downlooking on everybody including his colleagues in cabinet.A silly bastard that what Kabimba is,an allogant petty thief who wants people to dance to his tune. Does he still remember what the constable promised the Lozis and he repeated it during Bishop Duff’s funeral that Barotseland’64 is real and should be respected Why should this Kabimba thing want to confuse and mislead the Zambian people,thus why he was not appointed in the cabinet, i now can see the confusion.

    Reply
  9. vote
    flag ba Mufulira says: ba Mufulira
    March 1, 2012 at 3:00 pm |

    good advice to # team. we are all zambians at the end of the day whether u ar in diapora or not. i’m austrian people wud be shocked at yo comment # 3. its unbelievable. Chongwez recommendations are nt hiz alone but fr the all team including us.:-\” however the coi needed to draw a balnce betwn regional interests n national interest in their recommendations. it is earsier to put up such recomms but let us also consider th route to achieving the same. it cn create anarchy if handled improperly

    Reply
  10. vote
    flag Anti Barotse says: Anti Barotse
    March 1, 2012 at 3:17 pm |

    Lets not forget that if the restoration happens, the Lozi’s throughout Zambia will become the enemy! I am against it…but I know they would be killed. Yes the paper was signed, but why be beauracratic #kaya spelling#. Cant you just forget it and move on as ZAMBIANS? Most of the people that advocate it don’t even live in Zambia. Remember how tense things were during elections? Well this time they would be worse. You shouldn’t think a war cant break out in Zambia coz it can! It was looming during ma elections. Westerners must be given development, not autonomy! ONE ZAMBIA, ONE NATION!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
    1. vote
      flag Pro Barotse says: Pro Barotse
      March 1, 2012 at 7:15 pm |

      Your thinking is warped. Lozis should have been your enemy when they enabled you to form a unitary state by signing that agreement which protected Barotseland from any internal manipulations by the new nation Zambia. Therefore, the agreement as the British High Commissioner has rightly pointed out was about uniting Barotseland and Northern Rhodesia, in a manner that would protect the interests of Barotseland. Son rather than make enemies, you think be thankful that this enabled Zambia to become what it is and therefore there was no need to abrogate it, as doing so reverted Barotseland to its former state.

    2. vote
      flag Mad Bemba colonizer of Zambia says: Mad Bemba colonizer of Zambia
      March 2, 2012 at 9:55 am |

      As a Bemba I feel we are thieves by nature but surely we can not steal a country, even wifes are not stolen unless there are willing………….

  11. vote
    flag Linyungandambo says: Linyungandambo
    March 1, 2012 at 3:19 pm |

    Njenje yahao Kabimbia. Ni simu toho sahao!

    Reply
  12. vote
    flag private journalist says: private journalist
    March 1, 2012 at 3:22 pm |

    THIS OLD DIRTY PIECE OF SHIT MUST BE BURNED AND FORGOTTEN FOR REVER.ITS NOT AN ISSUE ANYMORE.1 ZED 1 NATION.PERIOD!

    Reply
    1. vote
      flag Ndate Mwanana says: Ndate Mwanana
      March 5, 2012 at 9:36 am |

      #12 dont b funny!!! Thats a legal document that should not just be thrown like shit or rubbish. Dont annoy us. U are so ignorant. Go back to grade 2. Mayb u can become somebody.

  13. vote
    flag Mungoni says: Mungoni
    March 1, 2012 at 3:42 pm |

    lozi pipo would need visa to come to our Zambia

    Reply
    1. vote
      flag Umodzi Kumawa says: Umodzi Kumawa
      March 1, 2012 at 6:25 pm |

      and you would need visa to go to Barotseland.You would also need to pay them to have your oil pipeline from Angola

  14. vote
    flag Ricky Bobby? says: Ricky Bobby?
    March 1, 2012 at 3:49 pm |

    ‘Dr Chongwe yesterday said Mr Kabimba should not accuse him of being an interested party in the matter because he was not the only lawyer representing the victims of the Mongu riots’. Mr. Chongwe should speak for himself, he was the chairman for the COI and a lawyer for the rioters. If he had any hint of integrity, he should have turned down the appointment and not sneaked his personal wish list into the final recommendations. I agree with Kabimba that RC had emotional attachment to the issues at hand.

    Reply
  15. vote
    flag Zed Poor People says: Zed Poor People
    March 1, 2012 at 4:28 pm |

    The issue is that a good number of us fail to understand that Zambia is a hybrid of Northern Rhodesia and Barotseland. In other words there is no Zambia without 64BE agreement. If you say we forget about this paper then we start from NR and have two states. By the way our BoZ was established mainly using funds from the BE trust funds. A good number of yu are not aware of this. Let us go to the national archieves and read. Then you can talk from an informed view point. PF has started something they have no stamina to handle. Ask Kaunda, he knows what is at stake here.

    Reply
  16. vote
    flag Nikomokile says: Nikomokile
    March 1, 2012 at 5:11 pm |

    Now we are going to be lectured by all sorts of paper gun zealots whose only performance so far is to play a broken opinion on something they cannot even pronounce properly, let alone comprehend. If Bwana Kabimba was a man of substance, he should have, at the very least, invited to that interview RC or one of the Commissioners instead of shadow boxing alone in the ring and thinking he came out champ. Infact, the man was disoriented by a simple sms asking whether the Litunga was in attendance when the BA64 was abrogated! What more if there was another panelist. It won’t do to just say the interview was paid for. That’s an old gimmick which is now stale!

    Reply
  17. vote
    flag Ricky Bobby? says: Ricky Bobby?
    March 1, 2012 at 6:01 pm |

    Zed Poor People, the problem with a lot of people like you is you want to start history from BA64. You need to go back to the reasons for the BA64, which is the Lockner Concession. We cannot forget the fact that the then Litunga misrepresented the extent of his chiefdom to include Tongaland, Lambaland, etc which ended up first being North Western Rhodesia and later Northern Rhodesia. The fraudulent award of land by the Litunga goes to the heart of the matter of our opposition to the BA64.

    Reply
  18. vote
    flag Ulemona says: Ulemona
    March 1, 2012 at 8:00 pm |

    we await the details. Well measured and very mature response. My hat off to you counsel!!!

    Reply
  19. vote
    flag Atase says: Atase
    March 1, 2012 at 8:11 pm |

    I don’t even know why Ba Kateka made this guy the chairman. I knew the moment that he was put that this was going to be bad! this is the man who wanted to drag Zambia into legalizing what UN guy is saying. This man has no substance.

    Reply
  20. vote
    flag Umodzi Kumawa says: Umodzi Kumawa
    March 1, 2012 at 8:20 pm |

    What a stupid ***** KK is.So he wrote to the then Litunga Yeta around 1991 promising him to restore BA64 if he won electins.Yet he has been quet all this time.Kolwestans you have gone too far with your lies

    Reply
  21. vote
    flag King Deceit says: King Deceit
    March 1, 2012 at 9:23 pm |

    It is Wynter again, brethren put on suitable clothing or you freeze.

    Reply
  22. vote
    flag King Deceit says: King Deceit
    March 1, 2012 at 9:25 pm |

    Those in PF, please tell us if the Secretary General of the party can also be reshuffled by the president.

    Reply
  23. vote
    flag Traguida says: Traguida
    March 1, 2012 at 10:18 pm |

    @# 22. King Deceit.
    Yes The Wynter can be Re-aligned to Summer.

    Reply
  24. vote
    flag Bemba Boy says: Bemba Boy
    March 1, 2012 at 11:02 pm |

    Dr Chongwe said in fact Kabimba had congratulated him after he was appointed chairman of the commission and wondered why the PF secretary general did not raise an objection with President Sata.

    He said in addition, there was a minister justice minister Sebastian Zulu from government who was a member of the commission.

    “Now by implication is Mr Kabimba actually attacking me or the Minister of Justice in our government today? Who sat on that commission? I think that will not be fair and I believe Mr Zulu as a minister in the government of the PF, must be a member of the PF. So I think that instead of trying to discredit someone, it is far much better to read and study the report and react to that report,” Dr Chongwe said.

    Reply
  25. vote
    flag A Phiri ana bwe... says: A Phiri ana bwe...
    March 2, 2012 at 1:06 am |

    Barotseland existed prior to the Lochner agreement whereas the country of Zambia did not :) The foreign powers aimed to reduce the size of the territory not increase it… When that land was chopped up in Europe and handed to one man (Rhodes) and his company to exploit there was an agenda already in place. No matter. It is down to viewpoint. When the emotion and annoyance ends over this issue there will be greater stories to be told that all Zambians can be proud of. It is BA64/N. Rhodesia that births Zambia. Zambia history can only begin in 1964 as it didn’t exist before then… No disrespect intended.

    Reply
  26. vote
    flag zedzed says: zedzed
    March 2, 2012 at 8:07 am |

    The Roger chongwe commission is very small to pass such a recomandation for the follwing reasons The following quastions should be answered be before looking at that recormandation
    1 How did the litunga aquare the land they claiming. 2 was the litunga the only chief in the area they are claiming. 3 Do they have title deeds for the land.4Do they have the map of the land recognised by all tribes occupying those areas as part of the litunga’s kingdom.If the lozis do not want to be part of zambia what makes them think that the Nkoya’s would like to be part of barotseland if they shall ever be a country like that

    Reply
  27. vote
    flag silent drums says: silent drums
    March 2, 2012 at 10:20 am |

    zedzed.you will never manage to stir brother againest brothr,us nkoyas are lozis.go and make your noiseelsewhere.headman mutondo is not the chief kaoma,the chief of kaoma is litiya of naliele.nkoya are prominent in BRE.

    Reply
  28. vote
    flag Pippa says: Pippa
    March 2, 2012 at 10:45 am |

    27# silent drums
    So what do you make out of mixed marriage offspring? So called half Lozi half Bemba…where do they stand?

    Reply
  29. vote
    flag Nikomokile says: Nikomokile
    March 2, 2012 at 10:51 am |

    Kabimba doesn’t even know that there’s no such thing as a Lozi tribe for him to say the Lozi tribe constitutes a very small grouping in Barotseland compared to the Mbundas, Chokwe, Nyengo, Nkoya, Mbukushu, Yeyi, Luyi etc. Anyone whose done a bit of Grd7 would know that all these tribes constitute ‘bu-lozi’ for lack of a better term.

    Reply
  30. vote
    flag silent drums says: silent drums
    March 2, 2012 at 11:01 am |

    it will be nice to see a letter writen by KK in favour of BA64.

    Reply
  31. vote
    flag macraken Gary says: macraken Gary
    March 2, 2012 at 11:02 am |

    # 23 that is very funny .Anyway this is faulty towers i,m enjoying the never ending comedy of leadership crisis in this country 

    Reply
  32. vote
    flag silent drums says: silent drums
    March 2, 2012 at 11:07 am |

    Kabimba has been serioulsy taken to the classroom by RC.Mr choongwe,very very proffessional.we didnt know kabimba really wanted to be one of the barotse detainee lawyer.Bravo also to the british high commissioner saying the BA64 is serious and is what binds zambia.ohhhhhhhhhh,its barotse thing is so nice.

    Reply
  33. vote
    flag silent drums says: silent drums
    March 2, 2012 at 11:09 am |

    May the lord add manymore years to Mr chongwe and his team for being so professional.

    Reply
  34. vote
    flag Decon says: Decon
    March 2, 2012 at 11:27 am |

    Why did PF appoint RC as chair of the the commission if they believed he had emotional attachment to the issue? Dealing with dull heads is a problem and always frustrating. Patroitic Fools (PF) you are failing even during your honey moon. Shame.

    Reply
  35. vote
    flag Jonathan says: Jonathan
    March 2, 2012 at 12:22 pm |

    I have had occasion to read Mr Chongwe’s measured and nuanced response and I agree with him fully. Among the Commissioners were distinguished lawyers like Mr Mun’gomba and Justice Minister Sebastian Saizi Zulu ,who as State Counsel are far senior and respectable to Kabimba.
    Zambia will remain a comedy of errors with leaders like Kabimba.Kabimba go and hang.

    Reply
  36. vote
    flag werer says: werer
    March 2, 2012 at 12:33 pm |

    All of this because of campaign lies.
    Let the sleeping dogs lie.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>