LUSAKA — Patriotic Front Vice President and Acting President Given Lubinda has issued a firm rejection of the Tonse Alliance’s January 2026 decision to demote the Patriotic Front from its position as the coalition’s primary political vehicle, describing the move as illegitimate, unconstitutional, and a betrayal of former president Edgar Chagwa Lungu’s democratic legacy.

In a detailed statement reported across multiple media platforms, Lubinda said the Patriotic Front remains the only legally registered and nationally structured political organisation capable of representing Lungu’s political vision and the millions of Zambians who supported it.

Lubinda dismissed assertions by Tonse Alliance acting chairperson Professor Dan Pule that an unregistered entity referred to as the “ECL PF Political Movement” constitutes an alternative or contingency platform for the coalition. He said no such arrangement exists in any Patriotic Front central committee resolution, party constitution, or formal public communication issued by Lungu before his death.

“The Patriotic Front is not a personal project that can be replaced at will,” Lubinda said, arguing that the party’s registration with the Electoral Commission of Zambia, nationwide constituency structures, and established membership distinguish it from informal political movements.

He recalled that in 2023, the PF central committee passed a binding resolution endorsing Edgar Lungu as the Tonse Alliance’s presidential candidate, a decision ratified by party delegates across the country. According to Lubinda, that resolution established PF as the anchor party of the alliance rather than a temporary participant.

Lubinda argued that dissolving PF’s role without a comparable democratic process undermines the principles the coalition claims to uphold. He said unity imposed through exclusion amounts to erasure rather than reform.

Reports in the Times of Zambia indicate that Tonse Alliance insiders have justified the decision by pointing to persistent internal divisions within PF following Lungu’s death. These include parallel leadership claims, court disputes over party symbols, and disagreements over candidate selection, which they say have weakened the party’s operational effectiveness.

Supporters of the shift argue that the ECL PF Political Movement, composed of former PF ministers, Members of Parliament, and senior officials loyal to Lungu, offers a more cohesive platform for the 2026 elections.

Lubinda rejected that view, warning that replacing a registered political party with an unregistered structure risks disenfranchising PF’s extensive grassroots base. He said the ECL PF Political Movement has no ECZ registration, no internal elections, and no official candidate lists, raising serious questions about its capacity to contest elections nationally.

He urged PF members to reject what he described as elite-driven political realignment and instead remain committed to the party’s constitutional processes, including planned internal elections.

Lubinda also criticised the Tonse council’s decision to remove a clause that had designated Lungu as the coalition’s 2026 flagbearer, describing the move as a posthumous slight. He maintained that leadership decisions must emerge from PF structures, not from an alliance that now excludes the party.

“If the Patriotic Front has challenges, they must be resolved internally,” Lubinda said. “Abandoning the party and calling it progress is neither democratic nor principled.”

He concluded by asserting that PF’s historical role in national development and opposition politics cannot be transferred to informal movements, insisting that only the registered Patriotic Front can legitimately carry forward Lungu’s political legacy.

PF condemns Mung’andu for “desperate lies” as former MP stands by claims

LUSAKA — The Patriotic Front (PF) has launched a fierce rebuttal against its former Chama South member of Parliament, Davison Mung’andu, accusing him of spreading what it termed “wild and unbelievable falsehoods” in an attempt to ingratiate himself with President Hakainde Hichilema.

The dispute follows remarks made by Mung’andu during a rally addressed by President Hichilema at Choma Sports Club on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, where the former lawmaker alleged that the PF deliberately sabotaged Zambia’s economy ahead of the 2021 general elections to frustrate the incoming United Party for National Development (UPND) administration.

In a strongly worded statement issued on Thursday, PF Central Committee member Ambassador Emmanuel Mwamba dismissed the claims as reckless and malicious. He accused Mung’andu of fabricating allegations to rewrite history and deflect responsibility for what the party described as the current government’s economic failures.

Among the most serious accusations raised by Mung’andu was a claim that a senior PF official transported $9 million in cash out of the country just one week before President Hichilema’s swearing-in on August 24, 2021. The PF described the allegation as baseless and politically motivated.

“It is ridiculous to blame President Hichilema’s monumental failures on the Patriotic Front,” Mwamba stated, attributing Zambia’s economic challenges to what he characterised as incompetence, inexperience, and policy decisions that favour foreign multinationals and a small group of beneficiaries.

The PF challenged Mung’andu to submit any evidence supporting his claims to law enforcement agencies, questioning why he had not reported the matter to the Drug Enforcement Commission or the Anti-Corruption Commission if the allegations were credible. The party said the absence of formal complaints undermined the authenticity of the accusations.

Mung’andu, however, has stood by his assertions. Addressing supporters in Choma, he maintained that PF’s final months in office were marked by economic mismanagement, including artificial shortages, manipulation of inflation data, and concealment of unsustainable debt levels. He accused the former administration of leaving the treasury depleted and the economy on the brink of collapse.

He further claimed that the alleged $9 million transfer was part of a broader pattern of last-minute asset stripping by outgoing officials, arguing that the economic difficulties inherited by the UPND were not accidental but deliberate.

In its response, the PF defended its development record, citing what it described as measurable achievements during its time in power. The party said national electricity generation capacity increased from about 1,600 megawatts in 2011 to 3,500 megawatts by 2021. It also pointed to the construction of more than 3,200 schools, 830 health facilities, 121 bridges, and approximately 14,000 kilometres of roads.

The PF further highlighted major infrastructure projects including the Solwezi–Chingola Dual Carriageway, Simon Mwansa Kapwepwe International Airport, and the Itezhi-Tezhi Hydropower Station, arguing that these developments contradict claims of deliberate economic sabotage.

Mung’andu countered that many of the projects were overbudget, underutilised, or financed through undisclosed borrowing. He referenced the 2021 debt disclosures that showed Zambia’s obligations had risen to more than $17 billion, much of it not previously presented to Parliament, a situation he said supported his claims of fiscal mismanagement.

The PF reminded the public that Mung’andu himself was elected to Parliament in 2021 on the PF ticket and benefited directly from the party’s political machinery and development record. The party accused him of abandoning his mandate for personal advancement, alleging that he had commercialised his political position.

Mung’andu rejected that characterisation, describing his political shift as a matter of conscience. He told supporters that had PF retained power after 2021, load-shedding would have worsened and inflation would have reached 50 percent, claims he said had been disproved by subsequent events.

The PF dismissed the remarks as theatrical and opportunistic, warning that such political defections undermine national unity as the country moves toward the 2026 general elections.

ZRA accused of internal collusion in Hilux sale to Archbishop Banda

LUSAKA — The Green Party (GP) has warned that the Zambia Revenue Authority risks triggering a nationwide tax boycott unless the government halts what it describes as a politically driven campaign against Lusaka Archbishop Dr Alick Banda and permits an independent investigation into allegations of internal fraud within the revenue agency.

GP president Peter Sinkamba said the state’s recent claims that official receipts connected to a disposed ZRA motor vehicle were falsified have gravely damaged public confidence in the tax authority and could destabilise Zambia’s entire revenue collection system.

Sinkamba expressed concern over reports involving former ZRA employee Mulopa Kaunda, who is alleged to be under pressure to state that official receipts were fabricated in his name to facilitate what authorities are now portraying as an unlawful sale or “gifting” of a Toyota Hilux to Archbishop Banda.

He described the situation as deeply troubling, particularly because the transaction in question had never been cited as irregular in any Auditor General’s report since 2021. Sinkamba questioned why allegations of falsification are emerging only now, suggesting either serious flaws in ZRA’s audit systems or deliberate timing for political purposes.

According to the GP leader, documentation surrounding the disposal of the vehicle indicates a legitimate transaction, yet the introduction of a falsified receipts narrative points to possible widespread internal collusion within ZRA. He warned that if such claims are accurate, they would signal unchecked abuse and systematic siphoning of public assets within one of the country’s most critical institutions.

Sinkamba said failure to independently verify or conclusively dismiss the allegations would leave taxpayers with little confidence in the integrity of the authority responsible for collecting public funds. In such circumstances, he argued, citizens would be justified in withholding tax payments until a comprehensive and transparent audit is conducted.

He cautioned that a tax boycott would have immediate and severe consequences, including a liquidity crisis that could disrupt essential public services such as healthcare, education, and security. Beyond domestic effects, he warned that a breakdown in revenue collection would undermine Zambia’s ability to service its national debt and could trigger negative responses from international credit rating agencies.

Sinkamba directly linked the unfolding situation to the government’s handling of Archbishop Banda’s case, arguing that the pursuit of the cleric has created economic risks far beyond the original allegations. He warned that continued escalation could result in widespread economic instability and long-term damage to public trust in state institutions.

He called on President Hakainde Hichilema to abandon what he described as an excessive focus on prosecuting Archbishop Banda, arguing that the political and economic costs now outweigh any perceived benefit. Sinkamba said ZRA’s credibility, once central to fiscal discipline, is now under threat.

Without immediate corrective action, including suspending politically charged investigations and appointing an impartial audit team, he warned that Zambia risks entering an economic spiral that could take years to reverse.

LUSAKA — New Heritage Party (NHP) president Chishala Kateka has called for the immediate revival of a dormant criminal prosecution file against United Party for National Development (UPND) secretary general Batuke Imenda, accusing the state of enforcing the law selectively and shielding ruling party officials from accountability.

Kateka was responding to Imenda’s public statement made during a press briefing on May 28, 2023, in which he referred to Lusaka Archbishop Dr Alick Banda as the “Lucifer of Zambia.” The remark was recorded, widely circulated across multiple media platforms, and was never withdrawn or apologised for.

Despite the public nature of the statement, the matter failed to proceed after the Director of Public Prosecutions declined to grant consent for prosecution when the case came before Magistrate Chanda on March 4, 2024. The DPP cited insufficient evidence, a decision that effectively stalled the matter. Since then, no further legal action has been taken.

Kateka described the inaction as a stark illustration of double standards in the administration of justice, arguing that speech by ruling party officials is treated with leniency while critics of government are subjected to aggressive prosecution.

She said the contrast became more pronounced following the recent summons of Archbishop Banda by the Drug Enforcement Commission over a donated Toyota Hilux vehicle. In her view, the swift mobilisation of investigative machinery against the cleric stood in sharp opposition to the reluctance shown in pursuing a hate speech complaint against a senior ruling party figure.

According to Kateka, the imbalance sends a dangerous signal to the public that the law is applied based on political alignment rather than principle. She maintained that criticism of government attracts punitive responses, while derogatory language directed at religious leaders by those aligned to power is effectively tolerated.

The NHP leader argued that Imenda’s remarks went beyond mere insult and crossed into hate speech, given the position held by Archbishop Banda and the broader social role of the church in national discourse. She said the language used was deliberately dehumanising and intended to discredit a moral authority that has consistently spoken on governance, social justice, and economic accountability.

Kateka further noted that in other politically sensitive cases, courts and prosecutors have shown decisiveness, particularly where opposition figures are concerned. She said comparable or even lesser speech-related offences have resulted in arrests, prolonged court processes, and custodial sentences when the accused are outside the ruling party.

She accused the prosecutorial decision-making process of reflecting what she termed institutional capture, where constitutionally independent bodies operate in ways that appear aligned with executive interests. She extended this criticism to law enforcement agencies, arguing that their enforcement patterns demonstrate selective enthusiasm, acting swiftly against perceived critics while exercising restraint when allies are implicated.

“The matter is not dormant because there is no evidence,” Kateka said. “It is dormant because of political convenience.”

She warned that when the law ceases to operate uniformly, it loses legitimacy and becomes an instrument of power rather than justice. In such circumstances, she said, public confidence in democratic institutions is steadily eroded, creating long-term risks for civic trust and constitutional governance.

Kateka said the continued failure to act on the Imenda case reinforces perceptions that statutes exist in form rather than substance, applied rigorously against some citizens and ignored when politically exposed individuals are involved.

She called on the Director of Public Prosecutions to reopen the file and subject the matter to judicial scrutiny, insisting that equality before the law must be demonstrated, not merely proclaimed.

At the centre of the controversy, she said, are three interconnected developments: the stalled prosecution over Imenda’s remarks, the active deployment of investigative agencies against Archbishop Banda, and the broader pattern of selective application of criminal justice mechanisms.

Her demand, she stressed, was straightforward: revive the case, apply the law evenly, and restore public confidence in the rule of law.