Oasis Forum Chairperson Beauty Katebe has called for the full withdrawal of Constitution Amendment Bill No. 7 of 2025, urging the government to restart the constitutional review process with legal safeguards and broader participation.
Speaking at State House during a meeting with President Hakainde Hichilema, Katebe said the Forum’s concerns centred on the process used to advance the proposed amendments. She stated that the organisation expected the amendment of the Constitution to follow established procedures from the beginning, noting that the current approach had raised questions about inclusivity and timing.
Katebe said the Forum initially expected to meet the President under different circumstances. According to her remarks, the organisation had hoped to express appreciation for government actions related to earlier commitments. Instead, she said the Forum felt compelled to raise concerns regarding the amendment process, which she described as not straightforward and requiring correction before further steps are taken.
She highlighted the need for a constitutional review that is “inclusive, not rushed,” and “holistic,” adding that any new process should include opening up the Bill of Rights. Katebe also reiterated that some provisions in Bill 7 touched on inclusion, particularly for women, and required careful handling through an appropriate procedure.
During her address, she referenced past instances of public exchanges between the Forum and government officials, noting that disagreements had previously played out in the media. She stated that the Forum welcomed the President’s invitation as an opportunity to resolve issues through direct engagement rather than through public exchanges.
Katebe outlined three expectations from the Oasis Forum: withdrawal of Bill 7 from Parliament, commencement of a fresh and legally safeguarded process, and broad-based participation that allows citizens to engage meaningfully in shaping constitutional amendments.
Before the parties proceeded into a closed-door session, Katebe emphasised that the organisation’s concerns were not based on opposition to reform but on the need for a process that follows constitutional norms and reflects public input.
Withdrawal of Bill 7 from Parliament, commencement of a fresh and legally safeguarded process, and broad-based participation that allows citizens to engage meaningfully in shaping constitutional amendments.
Following the meeting, President Hichilema stated on his official social media page that the engagement with Oasis Forum leaders lasted seven hours. He described the discussion as productive and affirmed the government’s commitment to maintaining open dialogue. The President acknowledged the existence of divergent views on national issues and said such differences are expected in a diverse society.
Hichilema stressed that the constitutional review process should not become a source of division and said his administration aims to pursue reforms intended to improve the general wellbeing of citizens. He thanked the Oasis Forum leadership, including Archbishop Ignatius Chama, for attending the meeting and expressed willingness to continue the dialogue.
Earlier, during the formal session reported by ZANIS, President Hichilema reiterated that dialogue is necessary when addressing concerns of national importance. He said government institutions, Parliament, and the courts remain open to discussion and collaboration. He added that confrontational methods are not an effective means of resolving national issues.
After the meeting concluded, Katebe briefed the media on the next steps in the engagement process. She announced that upcoming negotiations would involve a smaller and more focused team from both the government and the Oasis Forum. She said reducing the number of representatives would help make discussions clearer and more manageable.
Katebe noted that the previous meeting allowed both sides to present their positions and that the next round is expected to take place either the following day or shortly thereafter. She stated that the adjustment in representation aims to support continued dialogue on Bill 7 and related constitutional matters.
The Oasis Forum—comprising church mother bodies, the Law Association of Zambia, and other civil society organisations—has maintained that constitutional amendments must follow established legal procedures, include broad public participation, and prioritise the Bill of Rights.
The coming discussions will determine whether the parties can bridge their differences regarding the future of Bill 7 and the direction of the constitutional review process.




