
THE Lusaka magistrate court yesterday refused to grant an application by opposition United Party for National Development (UPND) Leader Hakainda Hichilema to appeal to the high court against its earlier decision to refuse to refer Hichilema’s criminal charge to the high court for determination on constitutional issues.
And Chief resident magistrate Joshua Banda told Hichilema’s lawyers that they could have avoided the confusion they have caused in regard to the same application had they avoided rushing to the high court to file a notice of appeal when they knew he was yet to decide on the way forward.
Hichilema through his lawyers despite having not heard the ruling from magistrate Banda rushed to file a notice of appeal to the Lusaka High court challenging the subordinate court’s decision.
The high court has since set November 15, 2012 as a date for hearing of the appeal.
This is in a case in which Hichilema, 50 is charged with one count of publication of false news with intent to cause fear and alarm to the public contrary to the Laws of Zambia.
It is alleged that Hichilema on June 11, 2012 in Lusaka, orally published statements in which he said, inter alia, that “PF had signed an arrangement for the militia in Sudan to train PF youths”.
“Prepare for trouble”; “Do you know what is going on in Darfur, Do you know what is going on in Abyei? Do you know what is going on there? Killings!”, statements which are likely to cause fear and alarm to the public.
But Hachilema through through his lawyers led by Sakwiba Sikota asked magistrate Banda to refer the case to the High Court for determination on contraventions of Article 18 and Article 20 of the Constitution of Zambia.
However Magistrate Banda refused to grant the application prompting the defence lawyers to make another application seeking for leave for their client to appeal to the high court over his decision.
Magistrate Banda reserved ruling to yesterday but before Hichilema could hear the verdict, his lawyers filed a notice of appeal to the high court.
In his ruling yesterday, Magistrate Banda noted that he could not grant the application because there was no provision in the criminal procedure code and Subordinate Cpourt Act that backed interlocutory appeals in criminal matters.
“That is the law. No appeal can lie to the high court if I had referred this case to the high court and the high court’s decision was found to be unfavorable then an appeal could lie to the supreme court as was in the recent case involving Frantelli Locci and Andrew Bwezani Banda Vs the people) said magistrate Banda.
Magistrate Banda said in criminal matters an accused person could not appeal against a decision relating to an interlocutory or preliminary issue.
He said “from the foregoing it must be stated that the interlocutory appeal from here to the high court in this matter cannot stand and trial shall proceed”
Immediately after the ruling Hichilema’s lawyers lead by Martha Mushipe sought guidance from the court premised on the fact her client had already filed a notice of appeal and the high court has already set a date of hearing.
But Magistrate Banda who maintained that Hichilema would undergo trial before his court said if only the defence had not rushed to file for notice of appeal, the confusion they have caused should have been avoided.
“I advised to rule on your application today and I do not understand why you rushed to file a notice of appeal in the high court when there was an application pending here. I will stand by the ruling and will proceed to trial and I will not consider what happens outside here” said Magistrate Banda.
He set January 14 2013 as a date for commencement of trial.













