
Tommorrow, 20 September 2011, is the day. Alea iacta est. The die is cast. The answer belongs to the Lord.
Recently, there has been much talk and speculation and allegations that the Zambia intelligence services are involved in electoral malpractice. This is a very serious accusation that the chief of the service must address and answer to.
Indeed in every intelligence service there are rogue individuals who may do things without the authority of the superiors, but this arm of public service must not be tainted by rumour and innuendo.
The former chief of ZISS Mr Xavier Chungu may have been involved in strange things with his employer the late Dr Chiluba, and that is clear. However, to insinuate that this is an ordinary and normal process for our Intelligence services, needs more evidence than what we have so far been treated to.
In the US and Britain, the work of the intelligence security services such as the CIA and MI5 is so secret that sometimes, as was revealed during the Iraq enquiries as well as the issue of extra-ordinary rendition that even politicians are kept in the dark as to what exactly is going on.
The reason is simple. The responsibility of Intelligence wings goes far beyond the individual politician but extends to the very core and existence of the nation state. Politicians come and go, but the nation state must remain. Thus, where the Intelligence officer sees a threat to the very existence of the nation state, he must act to prevent that damage, even if it appears to be ‘the will of the people.’
Retired General Collin Powel said clearly, ‘I do not comment on what the CIA does.’ This is poignant. The Intelligence service is crucial to the existence of a secure state and that is why we should not subject this high institution to ridicule.
There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The dodgy dosier on which the whole case for war against a sovereign state was made, was based on a ‘loopy’ Iraq dissident’s thesis whom the CIA never spoke to and was in prison in Germany! There would have been much to say against the CIA and MI5, but none of the politicians ever complained or criticised these institutions, not publicly at least!
Even the media only criticised the polititians and there are some people who were ready to indict Mr Bush and Mr Blair for war crimes. They acted purely on the basis of the intelligence that they were given and that is and will always be fallible as long as human beings are involved.
The point I am trying to make is this, that our Intelligence services have a higher cause to serve than that of individuals. Where they see, rightly or wrongly, a threat to the state, they should act in the interest of the state. They would be wrong to do so in the interest of an individual. Perhaps, our Intelligence friends trained in eastern Europe and under the UNIP regime, may have had other than the correct aims in their work, but this needs to be re-aligned and they need to be re-programmed to understand that their aim is to serve the nation state and not the political party in power. When this is in place, we would not comment on what ZISS does.