Monday, February 26, 2024

Africa expected to see a subdued economic recovery in 2022

Analysts noted that Africa is expected to see a subdued economic recovery in 2021 and not likely to reach 2019 growth levels till 2022

Share

Ghana, Senegal & Uganda met virtually with international financial partners and risk analysts to discuss the most urgent risks and mitigation solutions at ATI’s (www.ATI-ACA.org) annual Roundtable; Analysts noted that Africa is expected to see a subdued economic recovery in 2021 and not likely to reach 2019 growth levels till 2022; Debt defaults are likely to be contained to a small subset of countries with little chance of contagion spreading to other countries in the region.

At the African Trade Insurance Agency’s (ATI) Annual Investor Roundtable, investors, risk analysts and African governments weighed in on the prospects for the region to recover from the impacts of COVID-19. Analysts predicted a subdued recovery in 2021 with the possibility of countries not returning to 2019 growth levels till 2022.

Manuel Moses, ATI’s newly appointed Chief Executive Officer opened the session by emphasizing the importance of partnerships to help African economies recover from this unprecedented pandemic. He also noted ATI’s focus on lending more support to the most vulnerable economies, which the company plans to do through rapid membership expansion in the coming months with the support of partners like the European Investment Bank and the African Development Bank.

The session revealed several key factors that should guide the continent’s recovery. Notably, one of the striking features of the pandemic’s impact is that, unlike previous economic shocks that left their mark largely on commodity-dependent countries, for example, this pandemic is affecting a broader swathe of countries including more diversified economies and those reliant on tourism and the aviation sectors.

The IMF estimates that US$345 billion will be required in the next three years to help countries fully recover from the economic impacts of COVID-19, while the most comprehensive debt support initiative – the G20’s debt service suspension initiative (DSSI) will only provide US$6.5 billion to eligible countries through to June 2021. And the tangle of non-traditional financing sources, from the Middle East and Asia, for example, is adding even greater complexity to the debt issue.

Analysts also noted that there aren’t really any surprises given that countries likely to be the most resilient are those, such as Senegal and Uganda, which had sound fiscal and monetary policies in place before the pandemic while countries that were already vulnerable before the pandemic are predicted to fair worse with average debt burdens rising to 60% of GDP in 2020 compared to 40% in 2015.

Here are some additional highlights from the session.

Africa was spared significant health impacts but vigilance is still needed

Dr Robert Besseling, Founder and CEO of Pangea-Risk noted that so far, the pandemic seems to have impacted mostly North and Southern Africa. Each region accounts for 1/3 of the cumulative infections with Egypt and Morocco bearing the brunt of most of the infections in the North while South Africa alone accounts for 1/3 in the Southern region. However daily rates show that Africa on a whole, including countries in the East and West, are well on their way to experiencing a second wave. Currently there are 2.2 million cumulative infections with 300,000 active.

Debt default contagion limited to a few countries and has not spread

Speakers noted that rating actions have been measured and focused on where risks are highest and most pressing, which tend to be the less dynamic performers in the Single B category. In 2020, Moody’s took the most ratings actions, 20 in total, since 2016 and were focused on a small subset of countries, where the COVID shock exacerbated pre-existing credit weakness prior to the pandemic leaving these countries more susceptible to shocks and possible negative ratings.

By 2021, six African countries are expected to record government gross debt over 100% of GDP while debt burdens overall were expected to rise then stabilize by 2021/2022 above 60% of GDP. The most vulnerable countries are well known to the markets and have had pre-existing challenges. Given the isolated nature of current defaults, the general trend does not show any threat of regional spread or contagion.

The challenge going forward, is that these countries don’t have a historic track record of stabilizing such a rise in debt levels. Fiscal consolidation and revenue generation will be some of the factors needed to improve their credit quality over time.

African governments stress the need to treat countries individually

In laying out their strategies, the participating government representatives from Ghana, Senegal and Uganda all highlighted their uniqueness, which they felt should be a key factor in any discussion with partners interested in supporting pandemic recovery efforts on the continent.

The other key issue to emerge is that these countries are proactively putting in place strategic recovery plans that are both a continuation of their efforts to build sustainably while also laying the groundwork to cushion their economies against future shocks.

Senegal, for instance, as mentioned by Khalifa Sarr, an Advisor to the Minister of Economy, Planning and International Partnerships, is ranked as second out of 36 countries globally for their COVID response. This could not have been achieved, noted Mr Sarr, if the government hadn’t implemented a US$1.7 billion economic & social resiliency program in early April this year, representing 7% of their GDP. Sarr also commented that the international community should recognise that not all debt is equal. This socio-economic program, he added, is credited for saving thousands of lives and strengthening social infrastructure that will protect against future pandemics while adding to the next phase of their recovery program aimed at attracting the private sector through a new PPP framework and policies that will ease bureaucracy for investors.

Uganda has also taken a proactive stance. Despite being in the midst of a presidential election, Moses Kaggwa, the Director of Economic Affairs in the Ministry of Finance remarked that the country is expected to grow by 2.9% this year and 3.5-4% in 2021 – one of Africa’s top performers. And with a focus on generating jobs within the agriculture sector, which accounts for the employment of 70% of the population, they are ramping up value addition of some of these exports in addition to domestic tourism while the Uganda Development Bank is bridging the current financing gap to manufacturing and agribusiness. Combined, these measures are expected to aid in the country’s post-pandemic recovery in a way that impacts a majority of the population.

Likewise, Ghana, with a well-diversified economy, was helped by stable cocoa prices and a resurgent interest by investors in gold, which countered the effects of the downturn in oil prices according to Samuel Arkhurst, the Chief Economics Officer and Director of Treasury and the Debt Management Division. In addition, Ghana implemented a cash program that will stabilise the economy in the short-term and revitalize all sectors as the country emerges from the pandemic. Mr Arkhurst added that Ghana is fully committed to its medium-term debt strategy and expects to return to the Eurobond market in 2021.

Multilaterals urged to rethink their approach to supporting sovereigns

Investors, represented by Dr Christopher Marks, a Managing Director at MUFG, appealed to multilaterals to rethink their approach to supporting sovereigns by focusing on financing social as well as more traditional infrastructure development projects that will not include sovereign guarantees. This, noted Dr Marks, will provide more space on the balance sheets of commercial banks, like MUFG, to be able to provide more support as governments begin the process of strengthening their economies.

The annual Roundtable provides a platform for international investors, financiers and other stakeholders from the private sector to have open and honest exchanges with African governments about current investment and trade risks and potential solutions. The speakers at this year’s event included:

  • David Rogovic, Vice President & Senior Analyst, Sovereign Risk Group at Moody’s Investors Service;
  • Samuel Arkhurst, Chief Economics Officer and Director of Treasury and the Debt Management Division, Ghana;
  • Khalifa Sarr, Advisor in the Ministry of Economy, Planning & International Partnerships, Senegal;
  • Mr. Moses Kaggwa, Director of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Uganda;
  • Dr Christopher Marks, Managing Director, Head of Emerging Markets, Corporate Banking EMEA at MUFG; and
  • Moderation provided by Dr Robert Besseling, Founder and CEO of Pangea-Risk

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of African Trade Insurance Agency (ATI).

14 COMMENTS

    • Total ignorance here, none of the countries mentioned in the report have had their currencies devalue by 52% in a single year like Zambia. Don’t read things on face value, analyse before your comment. Ever heard of analytics? Why is Zambia worse off and it was like that even before Covid.

    • The guy calling others I.diots , this he goat must be told that insults wont help them. Just in case he has forgotten MMD left inflation at 6% it is at 17% now, Fuel was K5 a litre it is at K15 now, Mealie meal was at K30 it is at K150 now, Exchange rate to a dollar was at K6 it is at K21 now, reserves were decent. Though I am not UPND and I have never been one, I think HH will not come and perform as poorly as PF have done. The immediate past Former Bank of Zambia governor said Zambia’s economic decline had nothing to do with Covid 19 as the decline started way before. Other countries have had covid but their currencies have not depreciated by 52% in a single year. Under performance is an understatement

      2
      2
  1. The economies of countries mentioned in the report still showed some resilience, unlike Zambia which has just been blown away. We need leaders who are capable of putting up measures that can make economies resilient. In case of Zambia borrowing was reckless and governance poor. The two go hand in hand, where you see poor governance like abuse of the public order act, don’t expect a vibrant economy

  2. Humble leader, flat battery. Economy on auto pilot. I agree with Wynter on Zambias economy being a run away economy. We need a leader with the capacity, competency and intellect. Being humble should surely be off the check list when choosing the next leader

  3. @Kingsley-i think you are not being truthful. Kenya, Nigeria, Angola have seen their currencies devalue heavily after the commodity bust of 2014. MMD ran a lean GRZ that had no infrastructural obligations as per Washington Consensus doctrine-they built reserves of up to $3bn under record copper prices of upto $10k/ton while Zambian women gave birth on wet and dirty floors at uth, an equally appalling education policy and a pathetic energy policy. PF has come up with a different policy that emphasises on correcting such gaps. Yes we’ve borrowed but the commodities bust is biting-it has less to do with mismanagement. A change of GRZ is not the solution, a concerted effort by us and our leaders is what will take this country forward.

    • Surely the countries you have mentioned have not devalued any close to 52% in a single year like Zambia. I can send you the stats, in support of Kingsleys analysis. The countries you have mentioned have even received a nod from IMF and will receive support because of prudence. 3 years down the line, IMF is still very hesistant on Zambias situation for very obvious reasons

    • Zambian Citizen I hear you brother, If you are going to have a debt ratio of 102% to GDP as the case is with Zambia, surely that cant be an accident. Brother if that is not mismanagement, then you just have to invent a new word for for it because you wont find any existing word to describe the situation.

    • The analysis from number 5 called Zambian citizen is not true. MMD under RB did a lot of roads before his exit. For this Zambian citizen the gloomy stats are rosy, and this is where this country misses it. The more we continue calling a spade a big spoon the less the chances of improving our fortunes. PF have been a down right failure in all sectors, period, I will always be on the side of the truth. If all is well as per Zambian citizen, why are the economic indicators negative, other countries have not eroded like Zambia purely on account of prudent management.

  4. Zambia has been declared a junk status by respectable international rating agencies. You cant borrow to a level that you choke yourselves. Other countries started declining after covid 19 set in, Zambia was already in decline before covid and Kalyalya even told us before he exited the bank governorship that we were already in decline. RB showed us that he was a trained economist, and we were relatively okay compared to now, the lawyer is fumbling even with a simple constitution.

  5. Zambia the first country to default in our region on debt payment and people are still arguing that its not mismanagement, you think other countries do not have issues and yet their economies have been relatively resilient. Initiatives like austerity which were meant to help improve Zambias economic situation were being diluted by the same PF ,which was deliberately creating bye elections through the purchasing of councillors from other parties. How does the country improve like that.

  6. The procurement of councillors by PF from other parties and subsequent bye elections did not help Zambias economic fortunes resulting in lack of Panadol in some hospitals in the last 4 years

  7. @karambeu & Lambert: the problem with politics in Zambia today is that even intelligent people are willing to swallow cow dung from opposition and take it as gospel truth. The naira devalued by about 129% since oil prices crashed. I don’t see the fuss about another commodity dependant country like Zambia going through a similar issue when it is apparent. It doesn’t warranty a change of GRZ will improve our fortunes overnight. To blame it all on PF is just madness. Eg did MMD build power plants to avert the 2015 power crisis??? Lambert, simple arithmetic will tell you that our debt to GDP ratio is not more than 40% and 65% if you include internal debt-our GDP stands at $27bn, my man, just Google it….

Comments are closed.

Read more

Local News

Discover more from Lusaka Times-Zambia's Leading Online News Site - LusakaTimes.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading