And Ms Siliya has disclosed that discussions are underway to set up Universities in each provincial headquarters beginning with Northern, Southern and Eastern Provinces respectively.

The Education minister was speaking yesterday, on MUVI TV on a programme titled” the future of higher learning institutions in the country and monitored by ZANIS in Lusaka.

She reaffirmed government commitment to education saying for this cause the State values the importance of higher learning institutions in the country as an educated citizenry would contribute more favorably to the development of the country.

Ms Siliya however, refuted media reports that Government intends to de -link the University of Zambia (UNZA ) from the Ministry of Education saying proposals abound by some concerned individuals and other stake holders to de-link the country’s biggest varsity from her ministry..

She said discussion are underway to find lasting solutions at higher learning institutions such as UNZA and the Copperbelt University ( CBU) which she said were once belonged to the Ministry of Science and Technology.

The Education Minister stated that as a former UNZA student herself, she would like to see improvement at the institution in terms of infrastructure development and conducive learning environment for students in these institutions.

Ms. Siliya expressed She also showed dissatisfaction the congestion at the university of Zambia where some students share small rooms which only occupy few students.

She said Government is committed to improving the lives of students at high earning institutions so that he problems which has been affecting high learning institutions are solved once and for all.

ZANIS

CHIEF Government spokesperson Ronnie Shikapwasha has challenged Change Life Zambia executive director Frank Bwalya to explain to the people what he knows about the $100,000 money laundering scam and not start raising baseless accusations against the State.

In a statement issued in Lusaka yesterday, Lieutenant-General Shikapwasha, who is Information and Broadcasting Services minister, said as a priest, Father Bwalya had a calling to tell the truth because God would punish liars.

Gen Shikapwasha said the Government and the Church had always enjoyed good relations and it was, therefore, highly irresponsible for Fr Bwalya to drag the Church into his personal agendas.

He was reacting to the Press briefing by Fr Bwalya where he said the MMD wanted to orchestrate hatred against Catholics as enemies of the State bent on causing confusion and genocide in Zambia so that when the Government provoked political strife, the public would rise against the Catholics and slaughter them.

“Zambia has been a united and peaceful country and the Government and people of Zambia are determined to keep it so. To allege, therefore, that the Government is orchestrating hatred against any section of the Zambian society is not only cheap but also irresponsible of the highest proportion,” Gen Shikapwasha.

The minister noted Zambia continued to be a shining example where multiparty democracy had flourished since the early 1990s when the country reverted to plural politics.

Zambia has held regular, credible and peaceful elections which have been acclaimed regionally and internationally.

He said the Government under the leadership President Rupiah Banda remained steadfast in as far as providing effective leadership for continued peace, unity and development in the country was concerned.

And former Patriotic Front (PF) secretary general Edward Mumbi has advised Fr Bwalya to desist from dragging the Catholic Church into his clandestine activities because the Catholic Church is an independent and credible institution.

Mr Mumbi said Fr Bwalya was on sabbatical leave and so he should not drag the Catholic Church into his clandestine activities that were aimed at bringing divisions in the country.

He challenged the Catholic Church to come out in the open regarding its relationship with Fr Bwalya who had clearly taken a partisan stance.

“It is clear that Fr Bwalya has taken a partisan stance and so we would like the Catholic Church to come out in the open regarding the activities of Fr Bwalya.’’ he said.

Fr Bwalya threatened to sue Mr Mumbi for defamation for alleging that he got $100,000 from PF leader Michael Sata.

[Times of Zambia]

UNITED Party for National Development (UPND) president Hakainde Hichilema yesterday appeared in the High Court for contempt of court following allegations that he sold plots that had been contested through a court injunction.

Mr Hichilema appeared together with Lusaka lawyer Mubambe Muchende for allegedly selling the plots before the injunction filed by a Lusaka business executive was passed.

This is in a case in which Zlatko Vidmar has sued the two for allegedly selling land against a court injunction that restrained them from doing so until the matter was rested.

When the case came up before Judge Florence Lengalenga for continued cross examination, Mr Vidmar’s lawyer Mambwe Chipanzhya applied to the court to allow the plaintiff produce recently discovered evidence, which he said would have a material effect on the court’s decision.

Mr Mambwe said on November 3, 2010 his client filed in a notice to produce the documents that was duly served and acknowledged by the defendants.

He said no prejudice would be occasioned to Mr Hichilema and Mr Muchende because Mr Vidmar will still be cross-examined on the same documents he intended to produce.

But the defendants’ lawyer Noah Dindi objected to the application and argued that it was not tenable at law for the plaintiff to have a second bite after having given his evidence-in-chief.

He said the best option for the plaintiff was to call a separate witness who would refer to the same documents he had referred to. He implored the court to reject the application and allow cross-examination.

In response, Mr Mambwe insisted that no prejudice would be occasioned to the defendants if the court allowed the plaintiff to produce the documents.

Ms Justice Lengalenga reserved ruling to next week but adjourned the case to January 11 and February 1, 2010 on grounds that she would soon start handling criminal sessions.

[Times of Zambia]

MMD Chitambo Member of Parliament (MP) Solomon Musonda, who allegedly shot a Patriotic Front (PF) cadre, yesterday pleaded not guilty to a charge of causing bodily harm with intent to maim, disfigure or disable.

Appearing for plea before Justice Mugeni Siwale Mulenga at Kabwe High Court yesterday, Musonda, 34, denied causing bodily harm with intent to maim, disfigure or disable Jackson Musaka on June 1, this year.

Justice Mulenga set November 29 as date for commencement of trial after lawyer Mulilo Kabesha said Mr Sunday Nkonde, who is Musonda’s lawyer, was undergoing a medical review and could not travel to Kabwe yesterday.

Musonda’s bail was extended.

And State advocate Chipola Bako had earlier objected for trial to begin on November 29 because the State was ready to proceed with the matter and witnesses were on their way to Kabwe from Serenje.

Meanwhile, the Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) intends to join the case in which Lusaka lawyer John Sangwa and business executive Rajan Mahtani are charged with forgery and uttering a false document.

Defence lawyer Steven Malama told Lusaka chief resident magistrate Charles Kafunda that LAZ had indicated it wanted to be part of the proceedings.

This is in a matter in which former Finance Bank chairperson, Mahtani and Lusaka lawyer Sangwa are facing five counts of forgery, uttering a false document and fabricating evidence.

Mr Malama asked for an adjournment to allow him and his co-defence lawyer Robert Simeza organise a meeting with LAZ on the association’s intention to play a role in the proceedings.

Mahtani and Sangwa are on count one charged with forgery contrary to sections 342 and 347 of the Penal Code Chapter 87 of the Laws of Zambia.

In response, the State reluctantly accepted an adjournment but asked the court for guidance on LAZ’s intention to be part of the proceedings because this was not the first matter Mr Simeza and Mr Malama were handling.

State prosecutor Mwewa Musonda said the other reason was that LAZ was not on record in these proceedings.

But in his ruling, Mr Kafunda said the nature of LAZ’s intended role was not clear and he believed that was the source of concern expressed by the State.

He also found difficulties appreciating the actual purpose of the meetings alluded to but said LAZ president Steven Lungu had earlier applied to be part of the proceedings as amicus curiae.

“If there is need to look at other options open to the association regarding the case, it ought to have been made before the proceeding against the foregoing, I will also reluctantly grant the defence this application to enable them meet with LAZ,” he said.

The matter continues today

[Times of Zambia]

LUSAKA lawyer Patrick Mvunga yesterday argued that Section 37 of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) Act should be removed because it gives unrestrained power to the court to convict an accused person who has chosen to remain silent in a corruption case.

Maintaining his position that the section was unconstitutional, Professor Mvunga said the decision to amend it was long overdue and the country must seek solace in the Penal Code which had not been severed from the statutes.

In a statement released in Lusaka yesterday, Prof Mvunga, who chaired the 1990 constitutional review commission, said the wording in the Act made the accused person guilty unless he gave a satisfactory explanation to the court.

He said the law was against the general values of delivering fair justice where people were found guilty for them to explain their side of the story.

Prof Mvunga said he objected to the provision because it required the accused to give an explanation on oath and if the accused person remained silent, he would have failed to give the satisfactory explanation.

“In the instance of keeping silent, the effect of the provision is for the court to find the person guilty. This is contrary to Article (18) 7 of the Constitution which states that a person shall not be compelled to give evidence at his trial,” he said.

Prof Mvunga contested that his decision was consistent with the ruling by High Court Judge Dennis Chirwa in a corruption case in 1984 in which he ruled that a person could not be compelled to give evidence on oath if he elected to make an unsworn statement.

Judge Chirwa ruled that an accused person had the choice of remaining silent or saying something and if he chose to say something, he did so on oath or say something by way of an unsworn statement.

[pullquote]“In the instance of keeping silent, the effect of the provision is for the court to find the person guilty. This is contrary to Article (18) 7 of the Constitution which states that a person shall not be compelled to give evidence at his trial,” he said.[/pullquote]

He said to argue its case, the State had stated that article 53 (1) which was now ACC Act (37) was in direct conflict with the Constitution.

Prof Mvunga said Judge Chirwa described the Act as null and void and should be severed from the Act.

This is in a matter involving Thomas Mumba versus the People in the 1984 case when the judge ruled that an accused person should not be compelled to give evidence on oath if he elects to make an unsworn statement.

“This is why I take the position that Section 99 of the Penal Code, Cap 87 on the offence of abuse of authority of office as a better formulation and that in fact, this offence has not been abolished,” Prof Mvunga said.

The Government’s position is that the State should not find innocent people guilty but the prosecution should provide evidence indicating that the accused is guilty as provided for in the Penal Code section 99.

[Times of Zambia]