
LUSAKA lawyer, Rodger Chongwe has said it was nonsensical and embarrassing for the Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) to suggest that his judgment should be registered locally because Zambia is a signatory to the United Nations Human Rights Treaty.
Speaking in an interview from West Australia, Dr Chongwe said yesterday that since Zambia was signatory to United Nations Human Rights Treaty, there was no need to register judgments passed by the United Nations Human Rights Tribunal with the Zambian courts before executing them.
He said judgments which required to be registered were those obtained in individual countries such as the United Kingdom.
“I did not register to the Zambian courts, the Government is aware why. I have the right to go to the UN Tribunal because my country is a signatory and its judgment is not bound to the Zambian courts. There is a difference. It is better for LAZ to understand issues before commenting because these are national matters,” he said.
He said it was not true that the Zambian Government was not represented during proceedings because after judgment was passed, the Government applied to the UN to have it reviewed but the application was rejected.
But LAZ president, Steven Lungu maintained his earlier stance on the registration of Dr Chongwe’s judgment and wondered how else it could be enforced if not registered locally.
“If Dr Chongwe insists that there is no need for registration, then it’s his opinion. I am not misleading the nation, and what LAZ is not comfortable with is the fact that he is involving the president. This is wrong, we have the Ministry of Justice to deal with such matters,” he said.
Dr Chongwe said it was nonsensical and embarrassing for LAZ to suggest that his judgment should be registered locally because the treaty signed was between the UN and Zambia.[quote]
He said the Government should pay him because he was not the first one who would be awarded damages without having the judgment registered locally, claiming that many Zambian convicts who dragged their cases to the UN Tribunal had been awarded damages or had their capital sentences replaced with life imprisonment.
“In 1998, Chiko Bwalya was awarded damages by the Zambian Government after he won the case under the UN Tribunal. His case was not registered, so why should people raise eye-brows over my case? It’s probably they are not studying the cases, these judgments are different as well as their verdicts,” Dr Chongwe said.
The Government should not claim that it was not represented when it had even written to the UN Tribunal requesting to have the order re-opened but the tribunal rejected the request.
Dr Chongwe said then attorney general, Bonaventure Mutale had written to the Zambian Government to support the decision of the UN Treaty and asked it to pay him and this was copied to the UN in Geneva and the International Bar Association.
He said this did not raise any contentions at that time and it was only that the payment was not effected. He saw no reason why the contention should be raised now because the figure had risen.
Dr Chongwe was claiming for US$2.5 million plus interest of $700 per year since 2000 when the verdict was passed in his favour.
The claim results from a shooting incident which happened in Kabwe in 1997. He advised Mr Lungu and people who wanted to understand international law to consult professional international lawyers.
[Times of Zambia]