Faz says clubs will be free to register the eight banned Finnish football match fixers as soon as their worldwide ban are lifted.
Faz said in a statement none of the players’ international transfer certificates had been recalled from the Finnish FA.
“The Football Association of Zambia wishes to advise the football fraternity and nation that the Zambian players who were implicated and convicted in the Finnish courts for various match fixing scandals in Finland will be registered to play for local clubs that have expressed interest in their services,” FAZ stated.
“But that their return to football will have to be preceded by complete serving of the worldwide sanction, concluding the process of re-registration at the end of their bans as well as recalling of their International Transfer Certificates (ITC’s) from Finland through the FIFA Transfer Matching System (TMS). No ITC of the eight players involved in match fixing has been recalled from Finland.”
The eight Zambian players were convicted and handed suspended sentences before they were slapped with two year bans by FIFA last April back dated to April, 2011.
Yes FAZ should have been ready to welcome the banned Sudanese player SAIF who caused injury to the relegated chipolopolo
but uli chipuba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we are talking about zambian players who were barned!!!!!!!!!!but uli chi nangwa
Young people are so obsessed with quick money which they can’t even handle.
Vague statement…we take it nobody at Football House was courageous enough to present this statement in person!!
You celebrated ati ba faz are in hot soup, lelo ati ‘vague statement’
WELCOMING cheats and crooks!!! Well done FAZ. That it shows your integrity. You need to be proud.
lets hope they wont bring the match fixing in our football becouse our prosecution is almost to none
Let them go for other jobs.. In football they are all failures. We Finn will Never forgive or trust anyone of them any more. Wishing them the end of their footballing career.
Thats not the way you issue a statement imwe ba FAZ. This statement raises more questions