
By Henry Kyambalesa
As Zambia braces for the 2011 general elections, President Rupiah Banda has decided to trot around the country to seek the help of chiefs in his bid for re-election without making any effort whatsoever to address the needs and expectations of the common people.
President Banda needs to stop taking advantage of chiefs by using them in his political campaigns because they are likely to abuse the absolute traditional authority they wield by imposing their political views and choices on their subjects; and because chiefs are, ideally, supposed to be impartial leaders of all the people in their chiefdoms regardless of the political affiliations of their subjects.
Moreover, engaging traditional leaders to support the MMD in elections is likely to frustrate efforts aimed at creating a level playing field for all political contestants, since they (the traditional leaders) have a faithful following in their areas of jurisdiction. We would do well to address allegations of election-rigging, vote-buying, intimidation of voters, and access to public resources by the ruling political party without opening up other avenues for unfair political advantage.
In this endeavor, the MMD should stop consulting chiefs in the process of picking candidates for elective positions because it is likely to cause confusion if other political parties also decide to consult the same chiefs in picking their candidates.
Also, public assistance to chieftains should be removed from the office of the Republican president and placed under the aegis of the Parliamentary Committee on Local Governance, Housing and Chiefs’ Affairs in order to forestall any suspicions that assistance to chiefs is designed to woo their support for the ruling political party during elections.
If President Banda continues to use chiefs in his scheme to retain the presidency, he is likely to bring about disunity in chiefdoms among chiefs and their subjects who may have divergent political affiliations. This may eventually undermine the legitimacy of chieftains. Chiefs across Zambia need to emulate their North-Western Province counterparts, who decided not to involve themselves in any political rallies or campaigns for the Solwezi Central parliamentary by-election held on November 19, 2009.
Another issue that is of particular concern relates to some of the statements President Banda has thus far made on the campaign trail. For example, he has accused leaders in the PF-UPND pact of having no respect for chiefs. Such an accusation is unfounded, and it is both childish and irresponsible for a public official to try to pit traditional leaders against any other members of Zambian society.[quote]
Also, he has accused opposition-led councils of stealing money from people that is collected through property rates and levies. But if this is actually true, why haven’t the councils been charged with theft of public funds?
Moreover, he has alleged that the PF-UPND pact is a coalition of snakes with two heads that will never rule Zambia since the Constitution only allows for one Head of State. I am not aware of anyone in the PF-UPND pact who has said that the pact wished to have two Heads of State if it secured the people’s mandate to form government.
Besides, he has advised parents to educate their children, and urged pupils to be disciplined in order to succeed in their studies. This reminds me of a contentious statement made by the previous administration that Zambians should not think of having children if they cannot afford to finance their children’s education. And, by the way, the majority of children in Zambia today are already disciplined; what they really need are educational policies designed to provide educational opportunities for all children and adults by investing massively in teachers and educational facilities, abolishing Grades 7 and 9 elimination examinations, providing for low-interest educational grants and merit-based scholarships, and so forth.
Further, he has claimed that the people in Luapula Province have encouraged him to continue with “the good policies” the MMD is implementing. What good policies is the MMD implementing in Luapula Province or elsewhere in Zambia that will make education, healthcare, food, shelter, and other necessities of life readily accessible to all living Zambians?
And why on Earth would a country’s president be advocating for mass defections of citizens from opposition political parties to his party? Is this a scheme designed to create a UNIP-style one-party state?
I personally expect the Republican president to take the lead in engaging in issue-based politics. He needs to spent time telling the people what his administration is doing to address the catalogue of problems currently facing the country—such as poverty, hunger, illiteracy, disease, unemployment, dilapidated infrastructure, disadvantaged children, crime, corruption, and moral decay.
President Banda and his ministers should realize that meaningful socio-economic development will not come to Zambia like manna from heaven; it will need to be adequately planned for and diligently pursued. And they should not expect such development to be attained in an economy where the labour force is composed of large numbers of sickly, illiterate and starving citizens.
If he continues to be stubborn and arrogant, and to consider dissent and criticism as insults, he will end up being the worst Republican president Zambia has ever had—leaving no legacy at all! Dr. Kenneth D. Kaunda, for example, is credited with having presided over a government that provided free healthcare for all, free education for all, and as having secured the existing harmony among Zambia’s tribal groupings, as well as played a pivotal role in our beloved country’s struggle for independence.
Dr. Frederick T.J. Chiluba is credited with having spearheaded Zambia’s transition to multi-party democracy, and the adoption of a more liberalized economic system. While the late Levy P. Mwanawasa is credited with having introduced free healthcare for rural dwellers, provided for free education up to Grade 7, and embarked on a vicious fight against corruption.
We anxiously wait to see the kind of legacy President Rupiah Banda and his administration will leave behind.