By Isaac M. Mwanza
During a rare meeting last week, one of Zambia’s cooperating partners expressed serious concerns with regard to the pace of judicial reforms in Zambia.
The fishy role our superior courts played in the Kwacha and Kabushi Constituency by-elections continue to raise eyebrows among partners.
A major concern has been whether development assistance to the Judiciary would contribute towards desired reforms, increase public confidence in the Judiciary and make the institution more responsive.
Our Judiciary certainly needs adequate funding from government and assistance – both financial and technical – from our cooperating partners so as to make it efficient in the delivery of justice.
There are certain reforms that do not need serious financing but a proactive and internal commitment by the Judiciary itself to expeditiously hear and render judgements in a timely manner.
The delays in delivering judgments by the Supreme Court, now joined by the Constitutional Court, is more worrisome, especially in processes that affect citizens’ liberties, democracy and the country’s governance.
Our nation’s growth as a constitutional democracy requires that cases affecting our Constitution are attended to and determined in an expeditious manner.
Unfortunately, that has not been the case. The nation cannot afford to have such cases put on the back burner to simmer.
Prior to the 2016 constitutional amendments, we saw the 1996 presidential election petition drag on for 2 years while the 2001 presidential election petition dragged on for 4 years.
A case involving misconduct by one minister had also dragged for 3 years with the sanctioned minister staying in Parliament on a court order.
The affected parliamentarian was thus allowed to complete his parliamentary term without facing the sanctions stipulated in the Ministerial and Parliamentary Code of Conduct Act.
It was against this sad situation of inordinate and inexplicable delays in determination of electoral disputes and their deleterious effects on our nascent democracy that Zambians were compelled to put timelines in the Constitution.
It is this author’s opinion that, if the Judiciary had been proactive, Zambia did not need a constitutional review process to enshrine timelines for the courts to determine matters.
The Chief Justice of the Republic is empowered by law and can still make rules for disposing of cases in both the Supreme and Constitutional Courts.
This was recently done with revision of High Court Rules, providing timely disposal of cases by judges of the High Court.
Although the Constitution stipulate fixed periods within which a tribunal and court should dispose an electoral dispute, no such timelines exist for the Constitutional Court to dispose appeals.
Almost 2 years after the 2021 general election, some appeals remain undecided. In another constitutional case filed in February 2022, the decision – short as it was – was only delivered one year later.
In various courts, the country has seen cases involving political leaders or the government dragging on interminably as our adjudicators avoid rendering a “difficult” verdict.
The torment and anguish suffered by the suing parties who demand justice is completely ignored by our courts who seem to accept excuses tendered by government lawyers, and sometimes advocates to private litigants, to adjourn highly contentious matters interminably.
The stern warnings to enter judgment in default are never taken seriously: the government defendant or respondent rarely gets punished.
In one case in 1996, a High Court judge who had the courage to dismiss a dozen or so criminal cases for want of prosecution and freed accused persons faced a witch-hunt on mysterious charges until he stepped down.
Since then, no judge dares punish the government for its misconduct in matters before the courts.
During one meeting in Nairobi, civil society from selected African countries developed what is now a growing theory of “let time and not the court manage the case” to explain why judges would delay delivery of judgments in a contentious matter.
Under this theory, courts are said to deliberately delay judgments in order for the public and litigants to lose sight and memory of keys facts in those cases, or to lose interest such that when a judgment is finally delivered, there is less effect or discussion or public concern about the outcome.
In Kenya, superior courts have won the confidence and respect of the people of Kenya because of the timely manner in which they deliver judgments and the conclusive nature of their decisions.
In Zambia, the case of former Ministers under the Edgar Lungu administration which occurred shortly after amendments to the Constitution is a much-celebrated case for two reasons.
The first was the timeliness in the delivery of the decision by the Constitutional Court and the impact it had on jurisprudence.
The second was about the extraordinary courage the judges exhibited in holding an influential Republican President who appoints judges and his ministers accountable.
At that time, public sentiments were that Judges would not summon the courage against their appointing authority as they had just been appointed to the prestigious bench of the Constitutional Court.
There is of course another precedent in which the Court categorically held that were the Constitution does not provide for retraction of a resignation letter, a councillor who resigns cannot rescind his or her resignation.
These were certainly bold decisions by our Constitutional Court!
Freedom of expression and information remains a big issue with our court proceedings.
Chief Justice Malila had recently raised some now-dying hope that the courts would open their doors in 2023 to media houses who wish to give live courage to court proceedings.
This reform does not require much effort except engagement with the media on positioning of cameras and orienting them on how to preserve the decorum of the courts.
In South Africa, such live media coverage comes with it uncensored commentaries to ensure the public understand issues associated with a matter before court.
Our Judiciary in Zambia is ducking and weaving, to avoid implementation of the proposed reforms on media live coverage.
Nevertheless, the Judiciary must be commended for launching the office of Resident Judge at Provincial level.
If there are any lessons to be learnt though, it is how to not hastily establish courts so as to meet the political aspirations of the executive branch of government.
The establishment of the Economic and Financial Crimes Court (EFCC) in haste has created a perception – whether true or false – that the EFCC is nothing but a vessel for fixing political opponents while the economic and financial ills currently being committed are swept under the carpet.
The EFCC was established without any accompanying legislation to prescribe its jurisdiction, powers and sittings.
These court is said to be operating on the basis of jurisdictional decrees whose validity is contentious.
The Judiciary seem to have realised that it was wrong to first operationalise the EFCC and allow it to operate based on administrative decrees without enacting enabling legislation to govern its establishment.
Justice in Zambia can be a mockery especially when one is in litigation against the State, a most powerful party. Courts have a duty to protect communities from the powerful and politically correct.
[Published by the Daily Nation, May 2023]
Please explain how does one reform the corrupt mentalty prevailing in all spheres of society which has developed over the last 10 or so years
We will have to wait for the next generation or longer
Start with a disciplined ruling party. It’s cabinet should not misuse public finances for posh cars, fly around the world at taxpayers’ expense, Not use government financial processes to enrich themselves especially in the Ministries of Health, Finance, Local govt, Mining H Education
Do you know that Ministers in the Japan government use their own cars? Yet Japan is 1000 times richer than us. Then make the Police disciplined. Get a tough commander who knows the law inside out and also get an independent Police watchdog to investigate Police corruption and wrongdoing, separate the Traffic Police from ZP, buy them Helicopters
The misconception that we’ve always had is that Judges or judicial officers are immune or insulated from happenings in the Zambian society. They suffer the same temptation as everybody, they get horny and have emotions. Above all, they’re partisan. All these affect the quality of justice delivery. There are also rogue Judges. So judicial reforms can’t be targeted at Judicial officers alone. They’re also a reflection of the Zambian society. There’s a saying nowadays that it you want to lose friends, lend them money. That’s how bad things are
Reforms to protect the sitting government.
Hakainde is the most clueless hyena leader south of the equator.
He can’t shade off his narcissistic personality with a few crocodile smiles even when he wants to
Well articulated. Our judges at constitutional Court always find flimsy excuses not to properly adjudicate matters.
one of Zambia’s cooperating partners expressed serious concerns with regard to the pace of judicial reforms in Zambia. Yes and as one of Zambia’s citizens may I express serious concerns with regard to the pace of dumping those colonial wigs on judges’ heads in Zambia!! I hear the English judges have ditched them. They make our judges look ridiculous!
Sorry I actually meant ludicrous
What we need is to retire current crop of judges and ask everyone to apply to be judges. So long we use current system, judges will always be scared
This guy was underutilised by PF, now ve come to believe. He is so knowledgeable
But how were the Commercial Registry and Family Law divisions of the High Court established? There’s no enabling legislation to back their establishment apart from the administrative power vested in the Chief Justice.
In fact five years ago when I went to the High court to remove my slave name from my identity they put my deed poll in the commercial registry. I wondered why but the Registrar told me the important thing was for it to appear in the Govt Gazette
The unfortunate thing is that corruption started with the leadership. When we saw how they were enjoying themselves from theft, they could only lead us into temptation. What were once vices became habits
SLAVE IDENTITY kikiki
We african will always be slaves especially amongst ourselves
Its called slave labour which abounds here
We have placed judges above reproach such that any criticism of the judges attracts reprisals from the bench. Judges have been made and created like demigods who cannot be opposed. Sometimes they pass bogus judgements and everyone accepts.Judicial reforms is a pipedream in an environment of incompetence and corruption.
During the feud between “bosses” of DEC and DPP (Mary vs Lillian), it was recently revealed that political interference overrides the judiciary. When GRZ wants to implicate someone who is a hinderance to their cause, they unfailingly win. Even JJC leans towards that same cause while the “god worshipers” cheer loudly for the presidential victory.
Rightly, judicial reform must start with the republican president who presently enjoys “absolute” power; it is this power that corrupts the already corrupted justices who pass controversial verdicts while hiding behind law jargon.
Judicial Reforms In Zambia are A Myth
How much alive and how much far away is the judicial system in Zambia immuned from he who pays the Piper calls the tune? Judiciary is one of the pillars of democracy.
Comments are closed.