The United Party for National Development (UPND) is infuriated that its loss in last Thursday’s Luena parliamentary by-election is being celebrated by its alliance partner, the Patriotic Front (PF).
Consequently, the UPND has attacked the PF wondering how the electoral defeat of one pact member can be received so gleefully by another partner.
UPND youths also plan to petition their party to explain the nature of the PF/UPND pact because they were being insulted everyday.
UPND national chairman Joe Kalusa said it is sad that leaders of the PF are rejoicing over the outcome of the Luena by-elections when they are partners who should instead be consoling each other.
Mr Kalusa, who was with the UPND vice spokesperson Cornelius Mwitwa, said in an interview yesterday that the PF’s joy over the Luena loss is demeaning, provocative and intended to undermine the UPND.
“The attacks are with malice aimed at frustrating our party and eventually breaking the pact that the Zambian people have welcomed with both hands,” he said.
Mr Kalusa said the youths are wondering what kind of partnership UPND has engaged with PF if malicious celebrations can be the order of the day.
“It is really unacceptable how the PF vice-president Guy Scott can celebrate UPND loss in Luena,” he said in reference to an article in The Post newspaper yesterday where Dr Scott wrote that the theory that UPND was going to sweep Western Province was “well and truly punctured”.
Mr Kalusa said the utterances by PF are a clear indication that it is not interested in the pact.
He said the UPND youths plan to petition their party to explain the nature of the PF/UPND pact because they were being insulted everyday.
Mr Kalusa called on PF president Michael Sata to advise his party vice-president Dr Scott against rejoicing over the UPND loss in Luena to save the pact.
And Mr Kalusa accused the PF leadership of campaigning against the UPND.
“The PF leadership is on a vicious campaign to undermine UPND,” he said.
When contacted for a comment PF spokesperson Given Lubinda said he will comment on the matter today.
Dr Scott also wrote that a tiff between PF and UPND over who should contest this was what led to the current cracks in the PF-UPND pact.
“UPND leader Hakainde Hichilema was very clear that he was taking a territorial approach to expanding his party’s support base in Zambia and demanded to be in effect allocated all of Western Province as his hunting ground,” he said.
Dr Scott said this might have been reasonable in the days of Anderson Mazoka’s leadership when most of the Western seats were captured by UPND in the 2001 general elections, but currently, based on the results of the 2006 election, the party holds only one of the 17 constituencies in Western Province.
Dr Scott said eventually, UPND was given Luena to contest on the grounds that PF would be busy in Ndola and on the basis of the PF being given the next seat to come up for the contestation in the West.
“UPND must be ruing the day it ‘won’ the argument about who should contest Luena.
The constituency fell vacant when Charles Milupi formed his new party ADD and thus abandoned his independent status and automatically vacated his seat in Parliament.
“As a Lozi induna, he quite possibly had chunks of the Barotse Royal Establishment – particularly at the level of the village headmen organising for him; he also appears to have chunks of money at his command.
He won with 50 percent of the vote; MMD trailed him with 30 percent and UPND came with a mere 20 percent, despite the presence of Hakainde himself and a strong campaign team,” he said.
Dr Scott said the theory that UPND was going to sweep up Western Province was well and truly punctured! Consequentially also destroyed, or at least damaged, was the wishful scenario drawn up in some minds of the UPND quickly closing the gap between its popular support and that of PF – with the logical consequence that ‘HH’ would then have a legitimate claim to be the pact presidential candidate in 2011.
In 2008 presidential elections which is the last comprehensive ‘opinion poll’ held in the country, PF scored roughly twice as many constituencies. The erosion of the PF support in the Copperbelt and the rebirth of UPND in the West were indispensable parts of the catch-up scenario – and neither happened.
The conclusion is that the popularity rating of PF countrywide by any measure, is still approximately twice that of UPND. That the two parties together can still wipe out MMD by marshalling 60 percent of the vote against it remains a matter of simple arithmetic (20+40=60).
But the subplot of UPND expanding and or PF shrinking so that parity is achieved between the two parties – with the implied leadership contest -seems very remote as of the last week’s elections results, Dr Scott wrote.
[ Zambia Daily Mail ]