
PF cadres yesterday forced their way into the High Court foyer as some taunted and insulted police officers.
Some started chanting political slogans as Judge Gregory Phiri was hearing the party’s application to discharge the injunction in which the State is supporting the 27 Patriotic Front (PF) members of Parliament. The injunction is aimed at restraining PF from expelling its MPs for participating in the National Constitutional Conference (NCC).
Solicitor-General Dominic Sichinga said before Judge Phiri that the State’s position was that the injunction be sustained.
“The core public interest of the State is the integrity of the body known as NCC and integrity of NCC Act number 17 of 2007 by virtue of which the NCC was established.
“We submit that there is greater anxiety about prospects of a new constitution. It has taken many years for the country to have the NCC and enacting the NCC Act,” Mr Sichinga said.
He said the plaintiffs were MPs elected to enact laws and if their injunction were discharged, the constitution-making process would suffer setbacks, which in effect would not be atoned for in damages.
And the MPs’ lawyer Mutakela Lisimba said there was sufficient disclosure and a clear arguable claim that needed to be determined.
Mr Lisimba implored the court to rule in favour of the 18 MPs.
He said if the MPs were expelled from the party, they would suffer irreparable injury and their right to participate in party politics could not be atoned for in damages.
Mr Lisimba said for any democratic establishment, which the PF was, it should allow its members to agree or disagree.
Another plaintiffs’ lawyer Mwangala Zaloumis said the defendants caused delay in setting date for hearing the exparte injunction.
Ms Zaloumis said the defendants sought leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and the matter was adjourned sine die while waiting for the appeal to be heard.
“It is misleading to the court to say that the plaintiffs delayed the matter,” she said.
But defence lawyer Bonaventure Mutale maintained that the injunction should be discharged because there was no legal basis to continue sustaining it.
Mr Mutale said Mr Sichinga’s argument that discharging the injunction would negatively affect NCC proceedings was misconceived and misguided.
“The absence of 18 MPs is not likely to disrupt the NCC proceedings,” he said.
He asked the court to take judicial notice of media statements by PF Matero MP Faustina Sinyangwe in which she had been quoted as saying the party expelled her before the MPs sought the injunction.
He submitted that the restrictive injunction the MPs sought would not serve any purpose with regard to her.
“I submit that whatever ruling the court will deliver will and should not apply to Mrs Sinyangwe,” he said.
Another defence lawyer Mumba Kapumpa said it was not likely that the MPs would suffer irreparable damage if the injunction were discharged.
Judge Phiri set December 22, 2008, as the date for ruling.
[Zambia Daily Mail]