Advertisement Banner
Wednesday, September 24, 2025
Subscribe
Home Blog Page 86

Musokotwane Seeks More Borrowing, Recalls Parliament

Lusaka Times Editor
-
43
Musokotwane Seeks More Borrowing, Recalls Parliament

Musokotwane Seeks More Borrowing, Recalls Parliament

Zambia’s Minister of Finance and National Planning, Dr. Situmbeko Musokotwane, has requested the Speaker of the National Assembly to recall Parliament for an urgent session. The aim is to secure approval for additional borrowing to address the growing financial pressures the country is facing. This comes after two supplementary budgets were already sought earlier in the year.

The 2025 national budget, set at ZMW 217.1 billion, represented a 9% increase from 2024. It was designed with ambitious targets, including a projected GDP growth of 6.6%, inflation reduction to between 6% and 8%, and a budget deficit limited to 3.1% of GDP. However, those targets are proving difficult to achieve, as the country grapples with several economic challenges.

The budget was to be financed through domestic revenue of ZMW 174.2 billion, including ZMW 137.4 billion in tax revenue and ZMW 36.8 billion in non-tax revenue, as well as ZMW 8.1 billion in grants from cooperating partners. Borrowing was initially capped at ZMW 34.7 billion to cover the financing gap.

Economic pressures, however, have shifted the landscape. The ongoing effects of a severe drought have disrupted agricultural production, leading to food insecurity and stunted economic growth. This, coupled with the burden of managing Zambia’s significant debt repayments, has created a perfect storm of financial strain. Rising inflation, driven by higher food and fuel prices, has compounded the situation.

Critics of the government’s borrowing strategy argue that continued reliance on external and domestic loans is unsustainable. They point to the need for stricter fiscal discipline and greater transparency in public expenditure. Opposition leaders have also raised concerns about the lack of clarity on how previous loans and supplementary budgets have been utilized, questioning the government’s ability to deliver on its economic promises.

Dr. Musokotwane’s move comes at a time when the country is navigating the impacts of global economic pressures. Rising interest rates and a strengthening US dollar have increased borrowing costs for Zambia, limiting options for fiscal maneuvering. Domestically, the government faces the challenge of balancing social sector spending with investments in infrastructure, all while dealing with limited resources.

The call for Parliament to approve further borrowing underscores the urgency of finding immediate solutions. However, it also raises questions about Zambia’s long-term fiscal sustainability. Observers are closely watching the developments, with expectations that Parliament’s response will set the tone for how the country addresses its economic challenges in the coming months.

As Zambia faces this critical juncture, the pressure is on to implement innovative strategies to stabilize the economy and steer it back toward growth.

Stephenson Mangolwa

Lungu’s Plan B: The Enigma That Will Redefine Zambia’s Democracy

Lusaka Times Editor
-
27
Lungu’s Plan B: The Enigma That Will Redefine Zambia’s Democracy
Lungu’s Plan B: The Enigma That Will Redefine Zambia’s Democracy
By Dr Mwelwa
The recent decision by Zambia’s Constitutional Court to bar Edgar Chagwa Lungu from contesting in future elections marks a significant moment in the nation’s political history. For critics of Lungu, this ruling might seem like the closing chapter of a political career they have long sought to end. Yet for others, the judgment represents a troubling precedent, raising questions about the independence of institutions and the resilience of Zambia’s democracy. Regardless of where one stands, the implications of this decision extend far beyond the individual; they touch the very fabric of the nation’s democratic foundations.

This ruling is not merely a legal determination; it is a political flashpoint that has revealed the deep fault lines within Zambia’s governance structures. Whether one views Lungu as a polarizing figure or a champion of democracy, there is no denying that this moment reflects the fragility of institutions under the strain of partisan influence. But even as some celebrate and others mourn, a new narrative is emerging one centered on what Lungu has called “Plan B.”

What is Plan B? This is the question that now grips the nation. For Lungu’s critics, it is a source of unease, a reminder that he may not be as politically sidelined as they hoped. For his supporters, it is a rallying cry, a symbol of resilience in the face of what they perceive as systemic injustice. Yet its true nature remains shrouded in mystery, an enigma that both unsettles and inspires.

The court’s ruling has, inadvertently, done more than disqualify Lungu—it has galvanized a movement. Plan B, whatever it may be, is not simply a reaction to the judgment; it is a calculated response designed to challenge the status quo. Those familiar with the principles of political strategy understand that the power of such a plan lies in its ability to remain undefined. By its very ambiguity, Plan B forces both allies and adversaries to grapple with the unknown, creating a strategic advantage that cannot be easily countered.

For critics, this ambiguity is precisely what makes Plan B so unsettling. Is it a legal challenge aimed at reversing the court’s decision? A grassroots mobilization to reshape the political landscape? A new alliance that will upend the existing balance of power? Or is it something entirely different—a strategy that defies conventional political playbooks? The ruling elite, particularly those aligned with the United Party for National Development (UPND), must now contend with these uncertainties, unable to predict or preempt a plan they cannot fully comprehend.

Yet, for all its mystery, Plan B is not just a strategy it is a statement. It speaks to the enduring belief that democracy is not the property of a select few but the birthright of every Zambian. The court’s ruling, whether viewed as a victory for justice or a blow to democracy, has set the stage for a broader reckoning. Plan B is not about one man’s political ambitions; it is about reclaiming the principles that underpin the nation’s governance.

As Zambians reflect on this moment, the questions surrounding Plan B will continue to grow. Will it succeed in challenging the political establishment? Can it restore faith in institutions that many believe have been compromised? And, perhaps most intriguingly, what role will ordinary citizens play in shaping its outcome?

For now, Plan B remains an enigma a source of both intrigue and suspense. Its success will depend not only on its execution but also on its ability to inspire a nation. And as the UPND and its allies grapple with the implications of their victory in court, they must also reckon with the possibility that they have underestimated their adversary. For in their effort to neutralize Lungu, they may have inadvertently ignited a movement that transcends him.

The story of Plan B is still being written. Whether it becomes a footnote in Zambia’s political history or a defining chapter remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: the questions it raises and the challenges it poses will shape the nation’s democratic journey for years to come.

https://www.facebook.com/1073261366/posts/10229739368963139/?rdid=dGa2cUyU5zEAbBOF

Edgar Lungu dribbled by Emmanuel Mwamba and Raphael Nakacinda.

Chief Editor
-
28
Edgar Lungu dribbled by Emmanuel Mwamba and Raphael Nakacinda.

Sixth President ECL has been dribbled in a 90 minute match by the two top scorers in the likes of Emmanuel Mwamba and Raphael Nakacinda.

These two guys are crafty and they have systematically dribbled the Sixth President ECL.

These two guys perceived the future of the former President ECL and dribbled him in such a way by leaving Ukwa Party and join the proxy Tonse Alliance in order to save them selves from the embarrassment and subsequently save in their respective positions while they nurse the loss of the big Man’s political career, and the dashed hope of alebwelelapo projects success.

Why exert so much pressure on the Concourt judges as seen on social media even naming some judges.To me this is uncalled for behavior of desperate people who are some how exhibit the behavior people of Zambia rejected through the 2021 elections.

And after realizing that the sixth President ECL has no vision for the country,as each time he opens up the mouth as seen in campaigns and even when addressing his supporters,no alternative solutions has ever been offered by the Sixth President ECL apart from criticizing the government of the day.

The guys have noticed that the sole purpose of Opposition to offer checks and balances is not up to the game.
Even as things have not gone well with the Sixth President ECL concerning the landmark Con court judgment , these two guys remain in their respective positions currently and slowly continue to deceive the Man that he can still be a shadow President just as they previously did with Honourable Mundubile and play the don’t kubeba.

Honestly how could the Sixth President ECL be lured into jumping from Ukwa to Tonse Alliance and be a President of a party on paper and media,I mean the party without even a councilor and an MP.. What a miscalculation.

Even if Tonse Alliance has let’s assume 20 MPs can that number produce a President and unseat the current President and government in power,be honest and serious about national matters.

So these two guys know very well that Dr ECL is not sellable and an attractive candidate except to the blind few, moved by kasaka kandalama.

The unsatiable appetite for power and desperation of the sixth President ECL paved way for manipulation.Where are the political strongholds for Tonse Alliance? None apart from being on paper and media.

The concerned Citizens spoke and advised you sir to reflect on the comeback decision, out of love, with love and for the good of the man.We fully understand that it’s your constitutional rights to participate in any elections but done with reality and truth.People can deceive and manipulate when they see a weakness.

I always say “If men can promote you,then the same can bring you down”

Tiyende Pamodzi dimutima wumo, people can sing this song with you and you believe them yet they are far away from you, they don’t mean the song,form and meaning.

This is a good case study for current and future politicians that aspire for high office.Learn to listen to people you least regard and despise, for Wisdom is far from intellectualism.A good leader is a good listener and always seek wisdom and when he finds it he treasures it.

By Pastor M.Ching’andu

Citizens Have a Duty To Respect Decisions Of The Courts Of Law- LAZ

Chief Editor
-
56
Citizens Have a Duty To Respect Decisions Of The Courts Of Law- LAZ

Citizens have a duty to respect decisions of the duly constituted courts of law: LAZ reaction to the constitutional court Judgement in the Eligibitlity case of Michelo Chizombe v Edgar Chagwa Lungu and others 2023/CCZ/0021

The Law Association of Zambia (LAZ) has closely monitored the developments surrounding the eligibility case of Michelo Chizombe vs. Edgar Chagwa Lungu and Others -2023/CCZ/0021 before the Constitutional Court. We acknowledge the significant public interest generated by this case,including the Judgment delivered today by the Court.

By its Judgment, the Constitutional Court determined that Mr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu, the 1st Respondent is ineligible to contest any future elections having served two terms as President. This decision marks a departure from the Court’s earlier decision on the matter, specifically in the cases of Daniel Pule and Others vs Attorney General and Others, Bampi Aubrey Kapalasa and Another vs. The Attorney General and Legal Resources Foundation vs. Edgar Lungu and the Attorney General.

While we express concern about the potential risks of fluctuating decisions of an apex Court, which can invariably undermine public confidence in the Judiciary, LAZ firmly believes that the decision of the Constitutional Court must be respected by all citizens.

Under Part 8 of the Constitution of Zambia (Amendment) Act No. 2 of 2016, the Supreme law of the land given unto ourselves as citizens, judicial authority of the Republic which is derived from the people of Zambia is reposed in the courts of law, who have a final say on all mattes of legal interpretation.

It is, therefore, the duty of the Constitutional Court to settle disputes relating to interpretation of the Constitution. Having discharged its duty, in the eligibility case of Michelo Chizombe vs. Edgar Chagwa Lungu and Others -2023/CCZ/0021, all citizens have a corresponding duty to respect the court decision.

The foundation of our democracy lies in the respect citizens show for institutions of governance that we have collectively created for ourselves, such as the courts of law.

At the same time, in line with Article 118 of the Constitution, we strongly remind the Judiciary to ensure that judicial power is exercised in a just and fair manner. We trust that such an approach will foster accountability and preserve the public confidence that is essential to the integrity of the Judiciary.The press release on a matter of national interest, in defense of constitutionalism has been issued in furtherance of LAZ’s mandate under Section 4 of the Law Association of Zambia Act No 31 of the Laws of Zambia.

Lungisani Zulu
PRESIDENT

Edgar Lungu’s Defiant Reaction to Court Ruling- Plan B

Lusaka Times Editor
-
52
Edgar Lungu’s Defiant Reaction to Court Ruling- Plan B

Edgar Lungu, Zambia’s former president, fiercely condemned the Constitutional Court’s decision barring him from the 2026 elections. In his social media post, he accused the judiciary of being manipulated by political forces, prioritizing partisan interests over constitutional integrity. Lungu pointed to the strategic reshuffling of judges, claiming it was orchestrated to guarantee a pre-determined outcome.

He boldly activated “Plan B”, pledging a legal and political fight to restore democracy. Lungu vowed that true power lies with the people, not with a few ruling elites, and he insisted that Zambia’s democracy would ultimately prevail. His post sent a clear message: Zambia’s political battle is far from over, and democracy’s future will be shaped by the determination of its citizens. below is his Post word for word from his facebook page

MY RESPONSE TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUDGEMENT TODAY

Ladies and gentlemen of our beloved nation, esteemed members of the press, fellow patriots, and all who hold dear the principles of justice and constitutional democracy:

We find ourselves at a critical juncture in our nation’s history, a moment marked by deep reflection and, I dare say, a profound sense of our common identity and destiny. The verdict rendered today was expected. For months, the hands of political manipulation have, with undeniable force, steered us toward a conclusion foreseen not by the merits of reasoned argument or constitutional fidelity but by the weight of orchestrated design and political machinations. We kept on monitoring this!

To understand the gravity of this moment, we must revisit the sequence of events that brought us here. It began with a petition that sought to exclude me from the political arena—not through the natural verdict of the people on the ballot paper, but by the calculated intervention of political forces sponsored by political players. It unfolded with the reshaping of our Constitutional Court, the displacement of arbiters of justice, and the narrowing of judicial voices to fit a predetermined script.

Yes, specific judges were expelled in order to retain specific judges specifically for today’s judgment! We saw decisions cloaked in procedural justifications concocted by that same unmistakable hand of expediency. Judges were removed, some silenced, others promoted, and the very architecture of our judiciary reshaped to align with partisan imperatives. Of course, we all witnessed calculated judicial reshuffles by politicians for their plane to land here today.

And so, you have heard for yourselves, the verdict has been issued, declaring that my eligibility to stand in the 2026 elections is nullified by the weight of the court’s decision. I accept this verdict. I accept it not with resignation but with resolve. This is because this verdict transcends the fate of Edgar Chagwa Lungu. It speaks to the erosion of judicial independence, the weakening of our democratic foundations, and the weaponisation of our institutions for short-term gain.

But, my fellow countrymen and women, know this: from this blatant manipulation and disenfranchisement, a new resolve is born. Democracy, my fellow citizens, is not merely a system of governance but the lifeblood of our national identity. And therefore today, I declare that Plan B has been set in motion and Plan B shall legally fight to defeat and win for Zambians. Trust me, I in the spirit of democracy and Zambians shall win in and with Plan B!

This is not a retreat. It is not surrender. It is a recalibration of our efforts towards the sacred task of strengthening our democratic path. Plan B is rooted in the principle that democracy must prevail as a reality for every citizen of this land. Plan B is based on the enduring ideal that power must always reside with the people. Plan B will prove that no machination can extinguish the power of the Zambian people and that institutions must serve the public, not the ambitions of a few.

Let me assure you, I am filled not with bitterness but with renewed determination, political hope and faith that democracy, not court politics shall certainly win in 2026 without any doubt. We must show the world that Zambia’s democracy cannot be extinguished by a manipulated verdict. Zambians shall win and celebrate very soon, not few ruling elites through their proxies!

To those who believe they have triumphed today, I say this: history is a patient judge. The true verdict will be rendered not in the chambers of a court but in the hearts of the people of Zambia, and the annals of time.

My fellow Zambians, let us walk forward together with dignity and resolve. Let us prove that our democracy, though tested in this moment, will emerge stronger.

Today, Plan B goes into motion and democracy will prevail as well as win! Thank you, and may God bless our beloved Zambia.

Edgar Changwa Lungu
Sixth President of Zambia
PF President and Tonse Alliance 2026 Presidential Candidate

Edgar Lungu Ineligible for 2026 Elections: A Reflection on Legal Oversights and Finality

Lusaka Times Editor
-
49
Edgar Lungu Ineligible for 2026 Elections: A Reflection on Legal Oversights and Finality

Today, Zambia witnessed a pivotal judicial moment as the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) delivered its final judgment, declaring former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu ineligible to contest the 2026 elections. This decision has sent ripples across the nation, invoking both relief and outrage among different factions of the populace. The ruling underscores key legal errors made in the past, demands acceptance of the outcome, and forces the nation to confront its judicial history with sobering clarity.

The core of the judgment lies in acknowledging significant mistakes made by the ConCourt and the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) in the 2021 elections. Lungu’s candidacy in that election, while accepted at the time, was based on flawed legal interpretations and administrative oversights. ConCourt’s earlier rulings validated his nomination and ECZ’s acceptance of his qualification documents. Yet, today’s ruling implicitly admits these were made “per incuriam” legal decisions rendered without full consideration of the relevant facts or law.

Despite the errors leading to Lungu’s candidacy, the ConCourt has emphasized that the 2021 elections remain legally and constitutionally valid. This means there is no ground for a by-election, as the elections were not rendered void by today’s decision. For better or worse, Zambians must now live with the consequences of the judiciary’s past missteps.

The court’s ruling today reflects an evolution in its understanding of the Constitution, marking a departure from its earlier stance. However, the judgment avoided tackling the doctrine of res judicata the principle that once a matter has been judicially decided, it should not be reopened. Critics note that failing to address how the court departed from its previous decisions raises questions about consistency and legal finality.

Furthermore, the issue of locus standi the legal standing of the petitioner to bring the case—was left unaddressed. Observers have questioned why other presidential candidates from the 2021 elections were not part of this petition, a point that could have influenced the case’s scope and perceived impartiality.

Today’s ruling, while contentious, is unequivocally final. By declaring Lungu ineligible for 2026 but eligible in 2021, the court effectively admitted its own error while signaling a willingness to correct course. Zambians are now urged to accept the decision and move forward, with the understanding that the judiciary has reached its ultimate conclusion on this matter.

This judgment sends a message about the limitations of legal systems and the fallibility of even the highest courts. For supporters of the ruling, it marks a step toward safeguarding constitutional principles and ensuring leadership rotation. For critics, it highlights judicial inconsistencies that risk undermining public confidence in Zambia’s democratic institutions.

Today’s ruling on Edgar Lungu’s eligibility is as much a reckoning with the past as it is a statement about the future. While the decision closes one chapter in Zambia’s political history, it opens new discussions about the role of judicial accountability, electoral integrity, and constitutional clarity. Moving forward, the nation must grapple with these lessons to build a more robust democratic framework.

Clive Habeenzu

A Nation at a Crossroads, How the ConCourt’s Decision Shapes Zambia’s Future

Lusaka Times Editor
-
18
A Nation at a Crossroads, How the ConCourt’s Decision Shapes Zambia’s Future

Today’s ruling regarding former President Edgar Lungu’s eligibility for the 2026 Zambian presidential elections has sparked significant controversy across the nation. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) upheld Lungu’s eligibility for the 2021 elections but has now barred him from running in 2026, leading to accusations of inconsistency and disillusionment among many Zambians. This decision has ignited a heated debate about judicial independence, the clarity of the Constitution, and the concerning precedent it sets for the country.

While the court aimed to tackle a crucial constitutional issue, its ruling has generated more questions than answers. If Lungu was deemed eligible to run in 2021 after serving two terms, how can the same Constitution now deem him ineligible for 2026? Even a child would struggle to understand the reasoning. Critics contend that this ruling was strategically designed to prevent the invalidation of the 2021 general elections. Declaring him ineligible for 2021 could have led to a constitutional crisis, potentially nullifying the election results and throwing the country into turmoil with demands for a new election.

This case has also revealed significant flaws within Zambia’s judiciary. The frequent reshuffling of judges, including the alleged dismissal of three Constitutional Court justices by President Hakainde Hichilema, has raised concerns about the judiciary’s independence. The current bench, which has been restructured with judges reportedly appointed or promoted by the current administration, faces accusations of being used as a political instrument.

This isn’t the first time Lungu’s eligibility has come under scrutiny. The issue has been examined and resolved multiple times, including in the notable Danny Pule & Others, Aubrey Bampi Kapalasa, and Sishuwa Sishuwa cases. Each time, the conclusion was the same: Lungu’s partial term following Michael Sata’s death did not count as a full term. Yet, despite these rulings, the question of eligibility has been reopened again and again, with critics accusing the judiciary of playing to the whims of the Executive.

The UPND’s handling of this case may have been a strategic misstep. By barring Lungu in 2026, the ruling has reignited political tensions and potentially bolstered opposition unity. Some political analysts argue that today’s decision was designed to limit Lungu’s political influence while avoiding the fallout of overturning the 2021 elections. However, this maneuver may have backfired, as it has opened the UPND to accusations of judicial manipulation and undermining democratic institutions.

President Hichilema’s perceived willingness to sacrifice the independence of institutions like the judiciary, Parliament, and the Electoral Commission to achieve political goals has not gone unnoticed. Such actions risk eroding public confidence in Zambia’s democracy, leaving citizens to wonder: if even the highest court in the land cannot be trusted, where does one turn for justice?

The ConCourt’s decision, rather than settling the matter, seems to have marked the beginning of an endless cycle of petitions and counter-petitions. The judiciary’s inability to deliver a clear, definitive resolution has turned it into a circus, running like a headless chicken and drawing widespread criticism. Respect for judicial authority is eroding, as many believe the institution has failed to respect itself.

“Respect the judiciary,” people say. But how can citizens respect an entity that appears to contradict its own decisions and allow itself to be used as a political pawn?

Today’s choreographed ruling has not only complicated Zambia’s political landscape but also reshuffled opportunities in the opposition camp. With Lungu out of the picture for 2026, the race for leadership within the Patriotic Front (PF) has intensified, creating an unpredictable and volatile political environment.

The broader implications for Zambia’s democracy are concerning. The ConCourt’s ruling sets a precedent for revisiting final judgments, which could lead to an endless cycle of litigation over constitutional matters. This erodes judicial authority and creates uncertainty in the political arena, undermining the stability needed for national development.

Zambia finds itself at a critical juncture. The judiciary, once the cornerstone of justice, is now viewed with suspicion. Political leaders must recognize the damage caused by undermining democratic institutions and work toward restoring public trust. For the judiciary, the task is to reclaim its credibility by upholding its independence and delivering judgments free from political interference.

For now, however, the question of Edgar Lungu’s eligibility and the broader issues of judicial integrity and democratic governance remains a cloud hanging over Zambia’s future. The dust has not settled; if anything, it has been stirred up, leaving Zambians to grapple with the consequences of today’s decision.

Moses Haansimuna
Legal Analyst, Political Commentator, Investigative Journalist, Public Affairs Specialist
Austria

Lungu won’t be on the ballot in 2026 but unemployment and poverty

Chief Editor
-
46
Lungu won’t be on the ballot in 2026 but unemployment and poverty

You can’t spend five years in government lamenting your predecessor’s misrule hoping this strategy will insulate you from sharp scrutiny in the next election cycle. The focus on former President Edgar Lungu is hideous and so is the outcome of today’s verdict on his eligibility to contest the next Presidential elections.

How did we even get here? Lungu who was resoundingly humiliated at the polls three years ago and was effectively staring into his political sunset is now perilously close to achieving political martyrdom.Blame it on the ruling UPND, this government is way too enamoured with his political relevance and governance record that it has unconsciously taken its eyes off the most pertinent issues facing the country. As such, snuffing him off his political oxygen through all manner of machinations and trickery has only elevated his standing.

Alongside today’s verdict on his eligibility to contest the 2026 Presidential elections, the integrity of our Judiciary is also on trial. What is concerning is that our judiciary has not only abandoned all pretence of constitutional delinquency but has made its disregard for the rule of law a fundamental part of its character. One is left wondering, what has happened to the seemingly infallible Mumba Malila? He was elevated to the Chief Justice position to cleanse political cobwebs from the Judiciary. But has Malila lived up to this expectation or has himself become a cobweb? This morning’s verdict will tell.

So, will government’s elimination of one of its biggest rivals from the 2026 Presidential contest achieve anything? Nothing, absolutely nothing. There will be honking and high fives flying in the corridors of power after the verdict is passed but these celebrations will be short-lived. Truth is and Just like the 2021 polls, Lungu won’t be on the ballot but poverty, unemployment, rising cost of living including load and water shedding. These rate as the biggest threats to the UPND’s political fortunes than Lungu.

Dangers of fiddling with the Judiciary

Does the UPND realise just how much today’s Constitutional court ruling will impact its electoral fortunes, and the goodwill bestowed on the party post the 2021 polls? President Hakainde Hichilema’s ascendancy to plot one was a pure breeze. With it came lofty expectations from an electorate that was weary of corruption, unemployment, high food prices and poverty. His biggest pledge while in the opposition was that he would deal decisively with unemployment, poverty and corruption. He also committed to deliver a Judiciary that would be free from interference by the executive. Has he
delivered on these promises? Your guess is as good as mine.

Back to the Constitutional court, an established doctrine is that a ruling by this court becomes a legal precedent. Can somebody explain the difference to Lungu’s case then? You see, there are a few lessons to pick up from the recent electoral outcomes in the US. The outcome were a stark warning of how weaponisation of the justice system can birth an anti-democratic establishment. While we may successfully bar the former President from contesting the next elections, we need to be mindful of the consequences. Unlike Lungu whose blemishes are widely documented and could have struggled to
beat President Hakainde Hichilema in a rematch, the alternative for the opposition might be an even worse prospect to our democracy.

Another pertinent question. Has this leadership succeeded in delivering on its pledges? It’s not so much that it has spectacularly failed to rise to the challenges confronting the country but the boorishness with which this government has defended corruption and other misdemeanours committed by the Judiciary is astonishing. For many an independent pundit, today’s verdict is a brazen departure from our Judiciary’s established legal principles. And while true that the PF was
unapologetically corrupt, President Hichilema can’t be fixated on chasing Lungu’s shadow while his own officials are plundering the country’s wealth in broad day light.

Is corruption is stealing HH’s promise?

For context, let’s digress a bit. We do not know Diego Cassilis from a bar of soap but those who attest to his business acumen have endorsed his opinion that corruption which is now endemic in Zambia is costing the country its lustre as an investment destination. Now, whether Cassilis’s pronouncement is born out of a possible squeeze in business opportunities or genuine concerns about the country’s economic trajectory is debatable.

But what is indisputable is that the court of public opinion has become a jungle – more so in this era of social media. There are no laws, etiquette or decency whatsoever. Perception is the lodestar. This phenomenon is understandable. As humans, we are naturally inclined to operate not on reality but on our perception of reality. If it quarks, it’s a duck. If it’s got a long neck, it’s a giraffe, if it roars, it’s a lion.

And if it’s sung by Casillis who is known to have plot one’s ear, then the corruption allegations ring true. Add to this equation, the voices of disenchanted youth who are crumbling under the weight of a devastating socio-economic crisis, the electorate is surely twiddling its fingers in anticipation of 2026.Don’t’ forget, three years into its reign, the UPND has riled a significant number of its most ardent supporters, the clergy, politicians who served in the previous dispensation including the business community. The former President has effectively managed to coalesce this group of the walking wounded by transposing their ideals and suffering to his own cause.

In their world, they see in Lungu an apparent larger than life saviour who is on a mission to liberate them from socio-economic and political bondage. Their fortunes are hinged on his political survival.After today’s ruling, will he go quietly and carry with him the PF, UKA and the Tonse Alliance’s political ambitions into oblivion, or will he hold his ground to fight another day? This is politics. If a week can be lifetime, what of two years? I doubt we have head the last of Lungu.

By Chimwemwe Mwanza

PF Faction Leader Condemns Restriction of Public Access to Edgar Lungu’s Eligibility Judgment

Lusaka Times Editor
-
24
PF Faction Leader Condemns Restriction of Public Access to Edgar Lungu’s Eligibility Judgment

PF Faction Leader Condemns Restriction of Public Access to Edgar Lungu’s Eligibility Judgment

Raphael Nakacinda, the Secretary General of a faction within the Patriotic Front (PF), has strongly opposed the decision made by Inspector General of Police Grapheal Musamba and the judiciary to restrict public attendance at the upcoming court session for Edgar Lungu’s eligibility case, which is set for judgment on December 10, 2024. Nakacinda contends that no Zambian law prohibits citizens from attending court proceedings, viewing this decision as an unjustified breach of legal norms that erodes the foundation of the rule of law.

He has also sharply criticized Chief Justice Mumba Malila, accusing the Chief Justice of acting beyond his jurisdiction by permitting the live broadcasting of court proceedings. Nakacinda argues that such a decision should only be made after the necessary legislative amendments, rather than by unilateral judicial action. He believes that the Chief Justice should have waited for the legal framework to be updated before taking such matters into his own hands, underscoring a perceived disregard for the established judicial process.

Amid these tensions, Nakacinda’s stance highlights broader concerns about transparency, accountability, and the independence of Zambia’s judicial system. There is a growing debate among political observers and legal experts about the balance of authority between law enforcement bodies and the judiciary, and how decisions made by these institutions impact public trust in legal and political institutions

HOTFM Zambia

Church Calls for Peace Ahead of Kawambwa By-Elections

Lusaka Times Editor
-
5
Church Calls for Peace Ahead of Kawambwa By-Elections

Church Calls for Peace Ahead of Kawambwa By-Elections

St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Kawambwa has made a strong call for a peaceful and respectful atmosphere as Zambia prepares for the upcoming by-elections scheduled for December 20, 2024. In a significant message delivered during Sunday mass, Parish Priest Father Kunda Kashinga urged all political parties to set aside their differences and refrain from any acts of political violence. Instead, he emphasized the need to focus on constructive campaigns that reflect respect and mutual cooperation.

Father Kashinga’s call aligns with ongoing national efforts to ensure that Zambia’s electoral processes are free from disturbances and intimidation. Electoral campaigns have previously been marred by challenges such as clashes among party supporters, intimidation, and calls for accountability. His message underscores the commitment to protecting Zambia’s democratic values and ensuring a transparent electoral process.

During his sermon, Father Kashinga also addressed the local electorate, urging them to exercise their right to vote in a responsible and informed manner. Voters should prioritize merit and commitment to community development when choosing candidates. His caution against electoral malpractice and violence serves as a reminder that a legitimate election depends on honesty and transparency.

Father Kashinga stressed the importance of the church’s role as a partner in social development rather than a political opponent. Churches across Zambia have historically been instrumental in community initiatives, working alongside government institutions and NGOs to address social issues like education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation. Father Kashinga called on political leaders to view the church as an ally in national development, committed to the well-being of citizens without compromising neutrality.

Zambia’s commitment to peaceful elections and a transparent democratic process is not only about political integrity but also about ensuring a stable society where development and democracy coexist. Previous electoral events in the country have shown the necessity of cooperation among political parties, community leaders, and institutions to maintain social harmony and national stability.

Organizations such as the Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) and various civil society groups have also consistently emphasized the importance of adherence to electoral laws and the protection of voters’ rights. Their efforts reinforce the need for political campaigns to remain respectful and inclusive, focusing on national interests rather than individual or party gains.

As the Kawambwa community approaches the by-elections, Father Kashinga’s message serves as a vital reminder to all stakeholders that peace, democracy, and development go hand in hand. Upholding peaceful electoral practices will be a significant step in strengthening trust in Zambia’s democratic processes and ensuring a brighter future for its citizens.

Father Kashinga’s appeal highlights the collective responsibility of political players, religious leaders, and citizens to work together to achieve national progress. A stable electoral environment will not only secure democratic legitimacy but also pave the way for greater community development, economic growth, and social cohesion across Zambia.

Four Arrested Near High Court in Lusaka for Suspected Rituals, Police Clarify Motive

Lusaka Times Editor
-
22
Four Arrested Near High Court in Lusaka for Suspected Rituals, Police Clarify Motive

Four Arrested Near High Court in Lusaka for Suspected Rituals, Police Clarify Motive

Police in Lusaka have detained four individuals on allegations of conduct likely to cause a breach of peace after they were found engaging in suspicious activities near the High Court premises.

According to Police Spokesperson Rae Hamoonga, officers were on routine patrols when they received a report of unknown persons allegedly bathing within the High Court area for suspected ritualistic purposes. Responding to the tip-off, officers rushed to the location and apprehended Boyd Ngosa, 28, James Banda, 39, Dismas Sakala, 36, and Francis Kasote, 33.

However, preliminary investigations have since revealed a different narrative. Mr. Hamoonga clarified that the individuals are vagrants with no fixed place of residence and were not conducting any rituals within the High Court premises as initially reported.

“The suspects were found outside the High Court grounds at a location near the roundabout between three islands. This area contains a broken drainage system that collects water, which the individuals were allegedly using to wash plastic containers for resale,” he explained.

The spokesperson emphasized that contrary to earlier suspicions, the arrested individuals were not engaging in ritual practices but were carrying out an activity commonly associated with street vendors. The broken drainage system in the area has become a makeshift source of water for informal traders and vagrants, further complicating the situation.

The arrests have highlighted ongoing challenges related to vagrancy and informal economic activities in the city. Mr. Hamoonga reiterated the importance of public vigilance in reporting unusual behavior but also urged the public to avoid jumping to conclusions without verified evidence.

The four suspects remain in custody as investigations continue. Authorities are also considering measures to address the recurring issue of individuals using public spaces inappropriately, which often leads to misunderstandings and potential unrest.

The incident underscores the need for a multi-faceted approach to urban challenges, including addressing homelessness, improving sanitation, and providing alternative livelihoods for those engaging in informal trade. For now, the police have called for calm, assuring the public that there is no evidence of ritualistic activities linked to the incident.

Source : Zambia Police

Debt Alliance Commends Government’s IMF Reform Progress, Urges Caution

Lusaka Times Editor
-
10
Debt Alliance Commends Government’s IMF Reform Progress, Urges Caution

Debt Alliance Commends Government’s IMF Reform Progress, Urges Caution

The Civil Society Organizations Debt Alliance has applauded the Zambian government for its strides in implementing reforms under the International Monetary Fund (IMF) programs, describing the progress as a positive step toward economic recovery.

Speaking on behalf of the alliance, Coordinator Peter Mumba noted that the ongoing reforms are laying the groundwork for sustainable economic growth and have the potential to enhance the well-being of all Zambians. “The country is on track with these necessary reforms, and their successful implementation will be instrumental in building a resilient economy,” Mr. Mumba remarked.

However, Mr. Mumba also urged the government to carefully consider the broader impact of some policy adjustments. He stressed the importance of ensuring that the reforms do not lead to unintended consequences that could exacerbate existing challenges. “While reforms are necessary, their implementation must be measured and considerate of the social and economic realities faced by ordinary citizens,” he cautioned.

A particular concern raised by Mr. Mumba is the prevailing high cost of living, which he said has plunged many Zambians into poverty. He called for the government to prioritize measures that alleviate the burden on households, emphasizing that economic growth must translate into tangible benefits for citizens.

The Debt Alliance’s mixed message underscores the balance needed between pursuing structural reforms and addressing immediate socio-economic pressures. While IMF programs typically focus on fiscal discipline and economic stabilization, there is often public concern about their impact on vulnerable populations.

The government, which has been working to meet IMF program benchmarks, has highlighted the long-term benefits of these reforms, including increased investor confidence, macroeconomic stability, and debt sustainability. However, critics argue that the immediate cost of austerity measures can be steep for citizens already grappling with high food and energy prices.

Observers are calling for increased transparency and public engagement as the government moves forward with its reform agenda. Strengthening dialogue with civil society and other stakeholders, they suggest, will ensure that the reforms are not only effective but also inclusive.

The alliance’s acknowledgment of progress reflects optimism about Zambia’s economic trajectory, tempered by a clear reminder of the human cost of reforms. As Zambia navigates this critical period, the challenge remains to strike a balance between achieving fiscal stability and safeguarding the livelihoods of its people.

Edna Mwiinga

NHP Criticizes UPND Government for Favoring Foreign Businesses Over Locals

Lusaka Times Editor
-
12
NHP Criticizes UPND Government for Favoring Foreign Businesses Over Locals

The New Heritage Party (NHP) has voiced strong concerns over what it describes as the UPND-led government’s bias against Zambian-owned businesses. Party spokesperson Aggephrey Brill accused the administration of prioritizing foreign-owned enterprises through tax breaks and incentives while subjecting local entrepreneurs to stringent taxation and unfavorable economic conditions. The accusations highlight growing concerns about the challenges faced by local businesses in competing fairly in the current economic landscape.

Mr. Brill claimed that the government’s actions have created an uneven playing field, leaving Zambian businesses struggling to compete. He argued that foreign companies receive significant tax holidays and incentives, enabling them to thrive, while local businesses face high tax rates, multiple levies, and strict compliance requirements. According to him, this disparity not only disadvantages local entrepreneurs but also undermines the potential for sustainable economic development driven by Zambian-owned enterprises.

The spokesperson further alleged that state institutions are being misused to suppress local businesses and silence dissent. He pointed to the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA), police, and local councils as examples of government agencies used to impose excessive financial and regulatory burdens on Zambian citizens. Additionally, he cited laws such as the Public Order Act and the Cybercrime Act, claiming they are deployed to intimidate citizens and restrict their ability to voice concerns.

“State institutions and legal frameworks are being weaponized to discourage Zambian entrepreneurs and stifle economic freedom. The government is creating an environment where only a few benefit while the majority struggle to keep their businesses afloat,” Mr. Brill remarked.

The NHP highlighted specific challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the country. Local business owners are required to pay full royalties, duties, and taxes without receiving the kinds of relief granted to foreign entities. Market traders, mobile money operators, and small-scale entrepreneurs bear the brunt of these policies, dealing with a host of daily fees, including those for market stands, garbage collection, and toilet access. Mr. Brill described these charges as punitive, arguing they erode the already narrow profit margins of small businesses.

He also expressed concern about the impact on ordinary citizens, particularly those working in informal sectors. According to him, the numerous levies and taxes discourage entrepreneurship and hinder job creation. “Instead of empowering Zambians to build their own economic success stories, the government’s policies are effectively suppressing innovation and self-reliance,” Mr. Brill said.

The NHP has called on the government to revisit its policies and adopt a more inclusive approach that prioritizes the growth and success of Zambian-owned businesses. Mr. Brill argued that supporting local enterprises is key to achieving long-term economic resilience and reducing unemployment. He urged the government to introduce targeted incentives for Zambian businesses, including tax relief and simplified compliance processes.

The government has yet to respond to the allegations raised by the NHP. Officials in previous statements have defended their policies as essential for attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) and boosting economic activity. They maintain that foreign investors bring in capital and expertise that can stimulate growth in key sectors. However, the NHP insists that such measures should not come at the expense of local businesses.

Observers note that empowering Zambian-owned businesses is not only vital for economic justice but also a strategic move toward building a self-reliant and prosperous nation. For now, attention remains on whether the government will address these concerns and implement policies that foster an equitable and thriving business environment.

Mubanga Chitoshi

Why we support the cyber security bill!

Chief Editor
-
22
Why we support the cyber security bill!

Unless you haven’t been a victim of cyber bulling, then the cyber security bill would sound meaningless to you! Social media in this country has become toxic; day in and out, it is being used to abuse, brutalise, scandalise, malign, and victimise innocent souls. A good example is Chipo Mwanawasa, one of the advisors of President Hichilema. Rogue social media pages have gone out of the way writing several articles alleging that she’s in a motherly way, thanks to the Republican President! During one of his public engagements, the President even had to be forced to ask her to stand up for the public to see whether she was pregnant or not!

Chipo is one person that had has been well brought about by her family; she’s always media shy and dedicated to her work. Why should the nation indeed allow such a poor soul to be the subject of relentless abuse and attacks by such characters with impunity?

Equally, we’ve been victims of cyber bullying by Thomas Zyambo’s Zambian Whistleblower on a number of occasions. Whenever it fits them, they go out of the way writing trash about us; insinuating that State House is responsible for coaching and sponsoring us to report high profile individuals such as Brebner Changala, Rapheal Nakachinda, Maureen Mabonga, Munir Zulu and even Zyambo himself to the police! No one of course sponsors us to do what we do, we do it out of our own volition as we sincerely love our country.

If indeed State House is bankrolling us, we wouldn’t be jumping on Power Tools to Lusaka; we would be enjoying nights at Pamodzi and not even resorting to suffering through meals at Soweto market!

The other time, we had to fight running battles with Patriotic Front senior officials who were threatening to castrate my muzungu friend, Kelvin Soper (an equally able witness) and stuff his ‘ujeni’ into his mouth! Maybe it’s high time UPND had a change of heart and started doing politics differently to redeem itself of the AKASO syndrome! We are being accused of being sponsored by the state when we are actually struggling to make ends meet! Levy Ngoma, the political advisor to the President, are you listening?

Thomas Zyambo and his goons at the Zambian Whistleblower can continue writing voluminous materials about us, including invading our privacy by fishing out photos from our Facebook page, we won’t be cowed into submission. If anyone commits an offence which is likely to polarise this nation, we shall gladly dash to the police and report the same.

Munir Zulu once confronted our friend and fellow witness, Joseph Nkweto Kasonka at the Lusaka Magistrates court and warned him that the PF have prepared a HIT LIST to go after us after the change of government in 2026. Well, the beauty is that there won’t be any change of government as the Zambians long got fed up of the PF’s corruption, violence and theft but if at all the worse came to the worst-case scenario, we’d simply jump on a plane and seek asylum abroad!

All in all, we’d like to appeal to the New dawn Admiration to take the cyber security bill to Parliament and pass it as a law. Why should we allow a few individuals to continue abusing others!

Mwaloba ilyauma bashetani!

Prince Bill M. Kaping’a

Political/Social Analyst

2026 Presidential Elections: Clearing Pessimism Surrounding What Is Yet To Come

Chief Editor
-
4
2026 Presidential Elections: Clearing Pessimism Surrounding What Is Yet To Come

It is crystal clear and as clear as daylight that Zambia for many years has been an oasis of peace though it has not been a smooth journey for the country which is now 60 years.

Just before independence, there were skirmishes between the members of the African National Congress (ANC) and the United National Independence Party (UNIP) which at times resulted in loss of lives. At times the violence between ANC of Harry Mwaanga Nkumbula and Kaunda’s UNIP was so bloody that people got to the precipice of pessimism that Zambia was to get engulfed into incessant bloodletting but the two party leaders Nkumbula resolved their differences amicably.

The transition from a multiparty state to a one party participatory democracy as KK and his associates called it, was not an accidental upshot. It was compelled by deep-rooted vendettas which the two parties had against each other. Through persuasion with nobility and shrewdness of the mind, the leaders, KK and old Harry the Lion of Zambian politics, came to their senses and bemoaned the folly of violence and hatred fomented by the members which brought misery and pain to the patriotic citizens. The Choma Declaration was signed on 27th June 1973 by KK and Nkumbula at Choma Secondary School. Zambia passed the One Party State Bill in Parliament on 14th August 1973. The transition to political monomism was not easy road. It had so many areas of tension triggered by people concerned with how some leaders in Africa had mistreated their colleagues in opposition. Examples were readily available. Jomo Kenyatta had mistreated his lifelong friend Jaramogi Oginga Odinga; Kwame Nkrumah had suppressed his mentor and one time associate J.B. Danquah, Milton Obote had silenced Benedict Kiwanuka; and back home KK had stifled the voice of his boyhood friend Simon Kapwepwe.

It became fashionable for regimes in Africa to administer one party state systems which became more tyrannical than democratic. Even Communist regimes in Eastern Europe of post Second World War called themselves democratic governments when they proscribed multiparty systems to suit their selfish interests. The wind of change which swept across Eastern Europe swept away dictators and paved the way for genuine democracy. Zambia was not spared. The country reverted to political pluralism and held elections in October 1991 which swept away the party in power UNIP.

KK submitted to a humiliating defeat as the trade unionist Chiluba supplanted him in league with close associates of KK during the freedom struggle such as Arthur Wina and his brother Sikota, Humphrey Mulemba, Simon Zukas, Vernon Mwaanga and Andrew Kashita among others. There was a peaceful transition of power. Chiluba served his two terms of ten years and strove to seek a third term but Zambians protested and stopped him in his tracks. He chose Mwanawasa to succeed him. The strongest rival to Levy Mwanawasa was Anderson Kambela Mazoka the founder of the UPND. Mwanawasa won the presidential elections with a narrow margin. A great number of people wanted MMD out of power but it was retained though speculations mounted that Mazoka was robbed of victory. Lusaka had throngs of Mazoka sympathisers demonstrating in the streets for some days.

When Levy Mwanawasa was sworn in by Chief Justice Matthews Samson Ngulube, he warned protestors that if they continued with their violent demonstrations, then he was not their President. As long as he was head of state, Levy pledged to uphold the rule of law other than men. A day after elections, Lusaka was very calm and Mwanawasa had taken occupancy of State House. Chiluba thought the “ailing” Levy Mwanawasa who survived a nasty road accident was to submit to his whims and caprices but he was proved wrong and his Nyerere-like desire to serve as President of the MMD and Levy as Republican President was shot down. Instruments of power were in Levy’s strict hands and Chiluba was bumped off the seat he wanted to abuse as party president. Levy did his best to transform the economy and he spearheaded the debt cancellation and the Highly Indebted Countries (HIPC) completion point was reached with the full support and sound advice of Finance Minister Ng’andu Magande. Mwanawasa died in August 2008 in France where he was flown to for medical treatment after he collapsed at an African Union Summit. The by election was won by Rupiah Banda and the transition was very peaceful.

Mazoka had died earlier than his brother Levy, both coming from the ancestry of Bantu Botatwe (Three closely knitted ethnic groups -Tonga, Ila and Lenje). Rupiah Banda wanted to be himself and discarded some policies of Mwanawasa as he softened and weakened the fight against corruption. He just finished the term of Mwanawasa and denied his term. He suffered stunning defeat as Micheal Sata walloped him at the September Presidential polls. There was a smooth transition. No violence.

In 2006, Sata succumbed to defeat in the Presidential Election won by Levy Mwanawasa. His supporters went to the streets with intent to instigate violence but he stopped them. He knew Levy Mwanawasa was a no nonsense leader and was ready to throw into jail all lawless elements used by misguided political party leaders. The PF diehards had cried foul but were quietened in few days. Sata was assisted by Levy when he fell ill by flying him to South Africa in 2006. He came back and reconciled with Levy Mwanawasa. Mwanawasa said openly that he very cautious with the King Cobra who was subtle and could hit anyone any time. Sadly Levy died. When Sata won the elections in September 2011, he was very ill though he had a strong spirit of resilience and fortitude. He was surrounded by people who pretended to be PF faithfuls but had ulterior motives to loot the country in the event that he died. They had identified ECL as heir apparent to the ailing mighty King Cobra. When Comrade Sata passed on, the men and women thirsting for wealth and glamour in the socialist-inclined party came home to roost. They identified ECL as the most viable option to Sata. They insulted Guy Scott and character assassinated him. Some labelled Scott a neo-colonialist .

Harry Kalaba who served as deputy minister under the Office of the Vice President Scott together with ECL hurled racial remarks at Scott. Lungu stood in the By-election of January 2015 and won sympathy votes from the electorate. He also won the 2016 Presidential Election though the 2021 August 12th Elections blew his brains with utter shock and consternation he ever experienced. He had openly threatened to lock up HH immediately he handed over power to himself for enriching himself as the major player of privatisation of national economies. Hate speech and vitriolic verbiage were sprayed on HH and his allies. Tribal antagonism was the byword labelling one tribe as the evil caricature of Zambia. There was smooth transition when ECL succumbed to pressure and gracefully gave instruments to HH against his self-will to stay in power for another indefinite period.

Getting back to 1996 Presidential and General Elections. KK and UNIP blundered by withdrawing from participation in the Elections. Chiluba had weaker candidates like Chama Chakomboka and Dean Namulya Mung’omba who were thrashed like ants at the polls. Dean was outperformed by the clown veteran political giant mentored by Shimpundu Shikulu Simon Kapwepwe, Chama Chakomboka. UNIP scared the MMD out of their wits as many voters were fearful that UNIP cadres would beat them to death at the polling stations. Security was tight and nothing sinister happened as Zambians love their country. They cannot allow a single greedy politician with nasty lust for retention of power or ascension to power to destroy peace of the country dearest to their hearts.

No matter the outcome of the Constitutional Court decision on the eligibility of ECL, Zambians who value peace and unity outnumber greedy and selfish ones who want to thrive and survive by courting violence. The pessimism that is deeply rooted in so many loyal Zambian citizens will be translated into hope and trust as we get towards the 2026 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS and nothing evil that would be crafted by divisive zealots would succeed. The favour of God will be upon the country. The huge task we all have is to labour for a peaceful and united Zambia whose citizens from different political parties and heterogeneous ideologies will stand as one nation and shame the forces of division. The legacy of violence may be dissolved in the concentrated sulphuric acid of termination of chaos. Zambia is a country that must have zero tolerance of hate and vindictiveness. The country’s future matters more than the ambitions of self-styled, self-proclaimed men and women purporting to possess genius brains and immortal bodies that can rule from the graves. A better Zambia must pop up after the 2026 Presidential and General Elections and this would put the devil out of business and demons out of circulation wherever they are tormenting innocent souls. A poverty- free and better Zambia is what we long for with all the wealth we are endowed with by God’s mighty and bountiful hand.
God bless Zambia. God bless Africa our Motherland.

Author is an Academician and Historian
Shaddon Chanda

1...858687...5,667Page 86 of 5,667

Company

Trending

Categories

© Lusaka Times