Friday, June 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 5

Can First Lady Mutinta Hichilema Bridge Lungu Funeral Divide?: Soft Power, Not Protocol

26

By Kapya Kaoma

The death of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu should have united Zambia in solemn mourning. Instead, it has cracked open political wounds—threatening to turn his burial into a national crisis.

Rather than calming the waters, the UPND leadership seems to be digging in. Aside from its disjointed messaging, morally and emotionally, it is in a far weaker position than the Lungu family and the Patriotic Front (PF). With every press statement, threat, and act of procedural control, the state deepens the grief of the bereaved and hands the PF a powerful political opening.

Many UPND officials expect the PF to remain apolitical. This is wishful thinking. This funeral is being weaponized for a reason—the PF knew Lungu was its biggest asset for retaining power. With him gone, how it handles his death is key to its future. Beyond portraying itself and Lungu as victims of a vindictive regime, the PF has cast the UPND as indifferent to grief. By weaponizing bureaucracy, the HH administration is allowing the PF to mobilize, reclaim sympathy, and reframe the national conversation to its advantage.

President Hichilema’s administration must recognize another optic. Former First Lady Esther Lungu and her daughter Tasila are not passive mourners—they are active actors in their own right. Both have been on the receiving end of state persecution. Tasila, in particular, is a rising political force—possibly eyeing the presidency one day. Her father’s death has silently re-catapulted her into the national spotlight.
She stood by her father when he was booed at Hichilema’s inauguration. That image—one of filial loyalty in the face of public scorn—seared itself into the national memory. Many now await to see how she will honor him in death. But unlike other former presidents’ children, Tasila has won people’s hearts. She needs the PF to realize her dreams—and against Mweetwa’s antics, negotiations over Lungu’s funeral won’t happen without the PF at the table.

With the PF behind them, the Lungus won’t bow to the state’s demands. They have no reason to comply and every reason to resist. This is their chance to turn the tables on a system that has relentlessly harassed them. (If the Church didn’t stop HH from harassing them, why should it intervene now?) Moreover, the state cannot bury Lungu without their consent. Lungu was not just a former president, but a father and husband. They watched him die, and they deserve the dignity to grieve without state coercion.

To insist that the state dictates his funeral arrangements is tone-deaf. Lungu died a “neglected” private citizen. The UPND’s insistence on protocol—on treating his death as state property—only heightens tensions and hardens resentment. Besides, the family knows that an official state funeral could be held in the future under a different regime.

No doubt, the state has a role to play—but it must act as a respectful partner. Protocol only matters if it is acknowledged by all parties. In this situation, it is not. The PF and the Lungu family must set the tone, and the government must follow—not lead.
The President’s role and funeral arrangements ought to be negotiated with humility. Why not offer material support—tents, logistics, security—at the PF Secretariat as opposed to Belvedere Lodge? The UPND stands to gain no political capital from Lungu’s death. Public opinion is already formed.

Some are pointing to the Church to resolve the crisis. But what about First Lady Mutinta Hichilema? Could she be that bridge? Could she quietly reach out to Esther and Tasila Lungu—not through press conferences, but through the soft power of shared experience and maternal empathy?

Mutinta is a mother, too. She could speak to Tasila in ways the President cannot. She knows her husband better than anyone and may communicate with a nuance that politics simply doesn’t allow. She has no points to score—only peace and sympathy to offer both parties. I am not suggesting one meeting, but a number of discussions devoid of cameras. Could her soft power be the missing link?

I don’t want to dismiss the anger of the Lungus or the PF. It is real. The UPND officials’ overreach in attempts to impress the President could spark unrest. Yet I still believe that a careful, inclusive, and compassionate approach could bring us together. In mourning, there are no winners—only fragile, wounded human hearts. Lungu deserves a dignified burial. His family deserves compassion and respect. Zambia deserves peace.

Threats won’t give us any of these. But humility just might.

Kapya Kaoma

Kanchibiya Residents Commend Government For Farming Inputs

1

Residents of Kabinga Chiefdom in Kanchibiya District in Muchinga Province have commended the government for providing farming inputs through the Constituency Development Fund (CDF), stating that the support has significantly improved their agricultural productivity.

Greenard Mulenga, a local farmer, has described the CDF farming inputs as life changing, noting that the empowerment programme has not only transformed his livelihood but also increased his farm’s production capacity.

Speaking in an interview with the Zambia News and Information Services (ZANIS) , Mr. Mulenga said the farming inputs serve as capital for farmers which lead to improved harvests providing clear evidence of the programme’s success.
“Government has given us capital to start our farming businesses and it is up to us to utilise it to benefit our livelihoods,” he said.

No Unauthorized Statements on Lungu’s Death-UPND

No Unauthorized Statements on Lungu’s Death-UPND

Lusaka, Zambia – June 10, 2025 — The United Party for National Development (UPND) has moved to restore internal discipline and coherence during the national mourning period following the passing of former Republican President Edgar Chagwa Lungu. In a strongly worded statement issued by Secretary General Hon. Batuke Imenda, the ruling party has cautioned its members against issuing unsanctioned public remarks regarding the late president.

The UPND leadership has emphasized the importance of unified messaging, solemn conduct, and respect for national mourning protocols, urging its members to channel all official communication through designated party or government offices. The directive aims to curb political indiscipline and safeguard the dignity of the nation during this sensitive time.

Below is the full statement from the UPND Secretariat:


UPND SECRETARIAT CAUTIONS AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED STATEMENTS ON THE DEMISE OF FORMER PRESIDENT EDGAR CHAGWA LUNGU

The United Party for National Development (UPND) has issued a formal statement cautioning its members against making unauthorized public comments following the death of former Republican President, Mr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

In a notice released today the party’s Secretary General, Hon. Batuke Imenda, expressed concern over the proliferation of unsanctioned remarks made by individual party members.

“It has come to the attention of the Secretary General of the governing party that members have been issuing statements and comments on the demise of the former Republican President Edgar Chagwa Lungu without clearance or authority from the UPND Secretariat,” Mr. Imenda said.

Calling for a unified and respectful approach to national mourning, Mr. Imenda emphasized the importance of discipline, protocol, and solemnity during this period. “As we are mourning as a nation, we need to conduct ourselves in a systematic and organized solemn manner, preach peace and unity,” he added.

The UPND has now directed that all official communication regarding the party’s position or participation during the mourning period will be issued solely by the Office of the Secretary General, Party Spokesperson and the Party Media Team. Official government statements will be communicated by the Secretary to the Cabinet or the Chief Government Spokesperson.

Furthermore, all members or affiliates who wish to make public comments on this matter must first seek express authorization from the Office of the Media Director, Mr. Mark Simuuwe.

“This should be taken as an official notification,” the statement stated.

The UPND reiterates its condolences to the family of the late President Lungu and calls on all Zambians to stand together in dignity and respect during this time of national loss.

President Hichilema’s Maturity Shines Amid Confusion Over Late President Lungu’s Death

25

Amid wild speculation and confusion surrounding the alleged death of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, President Hakainde Hichilema has once again demonstrated leadership marked by maturity, calmness, and respect for national values.
While the Patriotic Front (PF) leadership and some of its supporters have chosen to react with panic, suspicion, and even political hostility, President Hichilema has maintained a dignified silence—choosing not to politicize the matter but to preserve peace and unity in the nation.

In any democracy, former heads of state are regarded not only as retired leaders but as national assets. They symbolize the country’s history, transitions, and lessons—whether good or bad. It is therefore important that issues concerning their health or well-being are handled with the utmost responsibility, not political recklessness.

The recent behaviour by some PF officials and sympathizers, sadly, reflects the same emotional and confrontational style of leadership that cost them the 2021 general elections. Instead of issuing clear statements to calm their supporters or engaging the public with facts, some chose to fuel confusion through conflicting messages on social media, further dividing an already tense public space.

President Hichilema’s silence is not ignorance—it is strategic leadership. It speaks volumes about his commitment to national unity and his refusal to be dragged into political drama at a time when the country needs clarity, not chaos.
It is high time the PF leadership and those close to the former president family come to terms with reality. The public deserves honest, respect during the mourning period—not political manipulation or blame games.
Zambia belongs to all Zambians—past, present, and future. In moments of uncertainty, the country looks to its leaders—both in and out of office—for guidance and maturity. President Hichilema has shown that. It’s now up to others to do the same.

By UPND BEYOND 2026

Imaginary Speech By HH About The Burial Of ECL

15

By Chanda Chisala

As the country goes through an unfortunate impasse between the family/party of the late president Edgar Lungu and the state, I suggest that the president makes a compromise speech that goes something like this:

Countrymen and Women,

As you all know, we currently have an unfortunate impasse following the death of President Edgar Lungu (MHSRIP), with different interests insisting on their own way as the only path forward concerning the funeral and burial of our late president.

As an act of compromise, I have decided that I and the top leadership of my party will not be attending the state funeral or burial of our beloved former president.

This is simply out of respect for the family and widow of president Lungu. Due to so much misinformation circulating in the country through social media, she may feel that I personally, and my party the UPND, hold some culpability in the events that culminated in the death of their beloved father and husband.

Let me clarify once and for all that when the benefits of retirement were withdrawn from the former president, we were only following the law; and this was a law that we did not make or even amend. We are a country of laws and we will be in breach of our Oath if we do not follow the law as it is written. This was neither my personal decision nor the decision of anyone in the UPND party or government.

Other than that, I must acknowledge that president Lungu and I did have an acrimonious relationship due to the nature of politics. This does not mean that I hated him personally, nor does it mean that he hated me personally. It is the nature of politics that sometimes you issue very strong statements against each other as you compete for political office so that you can bring the vision that you believe is the better one for the people. Naturally, you always believe the other person and his party have the worse policies for the country and you make it your duty to inform the public in the most passionate way. This can come off as personal hatred to some people, and some opportunists can take advantage of that perception and build all kinds of false stories that the public might find easy to believe.

The reason I have decided that my party and administration officials will stay away from this important function is therefore simply out of empathy for the family so that they may not feel tormented by our presence, given all the unfortunate misinformation that they may have come across. Some people have even recklessly implied that I had a hand in the actual death of the president, besides many such false rumours, so I can understand if Mrs Lungu may feel highly conflicted by my presence at the burial and funeral of our late former president.

I am therefore giving a directive to Cabinet Office to liaise with the army commander to manage and conduct the proceedings of a state funeral and burial that accords all the full respects to our former Commander-in-Chief and I will only send my blessing to them. As UPND president, I will also ask that our party withdraws from attending these events in their official capacity and allow the Patriotic Front to take preeminence at these functions. We will still mourn him in our own way, but there is no law that requires us to have official representation at these functions.

I hope this compromise helps in the process of our country healing from the acrimony that the deep political rifts have inflicted on our nation, as we move closer to the values of empathy demanded by our Christian nation.

I thank you and may God bless you all.

HH.

Give President Hichilema a break; PF is aggressive, cantankerous……unrepentant!

A number of people have come out with guns blazing wondering why President Hichilema continues to remain tight-lipped amidst demise of 6th Republican president Edgar Lungu.

The first one to throw a salvo was of course United Kwacha Alliance (UKA) Chairman, Sakwiba Sikota! During his visit to the Patriotic Front (PF) Secretariat, Sikota issued the following statement, “I have not heard President Hichilema physically address the nation regarding the death of Edgar Lungu. Tell me if I missed it, to me, it’s something that is frightening to remain silent. You are the head of state and your predecessor passes away, and you remain silent.”

In no time, Mwila-Chigaga, the widow of the late former finance minister in the United National Independence Party (UNIP) government Gibson Chigaga, asserted that Hichilema’s silence is troubling. She claimed that the failure and inaction by President Hichilema to provide leadership on the state of affairs regarding the death of former president Lungu is hurting the nation.

Are people being truthful and honest with the comments they are making regarding President Hichilema’s silence…..or they are simply politicking, if not merely trying to scandalize him? Moreover, what does the Bible teach us about silence?

Given what we have witnessed in the PF camp in recent days, we’ve no doubt the former ruling party remains aggressive, cantankerous and unrepentant! How do you therefore expect anyone to reason with such kind of people? Consider the way PF cadres took up the entire lane on the Kafue – Lusaka as they raced to the funeral at breakneck speed while perched on the sides of the doors of their convoy? We’ve no doubt they were more than happy to go back to their vomit….’kaponya style’ of conducting themselves in an uncivilized manner!

Those of us that are better grounded in our culture would have little trouble appreciating that when sorrow of such magnitude has visited our village, everyone is expected to be at their best, sworn enemies may burry their hatchets while the likes of ‘Why Me’ would put their dictionaries of ear-splitting profanities aside for a while as everyone combine efforts to give their dear departed one a dignified send-off…..

But lo and behold, what have we seen or heard since ba Lungu passed away? Accusations, ultimatums, threats and dire warnings all aimed at one individual – President Hichilema! How do you honestly expect him to say or issue any comment regarding the funeral? There’s a huge possibility he wasn’t even officially informed about the funeral by the family or indeed the PF leadership. Let’s be fair for once!

The confusion and drama that has characterized ba Lungu’s funeral is totally uncalled for! How come the party has taken ovet the show? Didn’t the former president have senior members in his family?

When Levy Mwanawasa passed on for instance, senior elders in his family, Jazzman Chikwakwa and Leslie Mbula immediately took charge – giving daily updates and coordinating with government. Similarly, Frederick Chiluba’s uncle, Ben Mwila was on hand to provide guidance when he suddenly died. Emmanuel Mwamba is said to have been the last person with him when this happened; we hope he shall write a book one day to give an account of what really transpired on that day.

Considering the confusion characterized with PF, one would have expected pandemonium to have reigned supreme when its founding leader, Micheal Sata answered the Lord’s call. Fortunately, all the responsibilities of making funeral arrangements rested on the shoulders of his uncle, Alexander Chikwanda, working on cahoots with the state of course.

The same thing happened when our founding father, Kenneth Kaunda’s time finally came. His eldest son, Panji seamlessly worked with government to find common ground even when there was a deadlock as to where to hide his remains….well, according to his last will and testament.

And when our good Lord finally took Rupiah Banda away, we didn’t witness any acrimony or standoff between his family and party on one hand, and government on the other, as we are seeing today despite the PF having denied him permission to travel to South Africa for treatment when Lungu served as Minister of Home Affairs. The occupation of cadres was restricted to chewing and quaffing while his young brother James Banda sorted out things with government unlike what we are seeing with the ressurrected PF ‘commanders’ today.

Why has ba Lungu’s family allowed PF and its surrogates to politicize this funeral? Ever since he died on June 5, it has been one inflammatory and virulent remark after another – Lungu was poisoned! HH not welcome at Lungu’s funeral as he’ll pierce our hearts….The fight has just started! 3 times you denied Lungu life….Hichilema must stay away from the funeral!

Honestly, how do you expect the President to say anything given such circumstances?
As a wise person, the President has done well to remain mute lest he may be misquoted. If we had a way, we’d advise the President to stay away from the funeral and instead delegate his vice-president to do the honours. Why should the President be exposed to an environment where he is definitely going to be disrespected and insulted as the PF has already demonstrated.

Meanwhile we remain observing the proceedings from the terraces with keen interest.

Prince Bill M Kaping’a
National Coordinator
HH Mpaka 2031
People’s Alliances

Who’s Really in Charge of Zambia?: What Lungu’s Funeral Reveal About Hichilema’s Leadership

By Kapya Kaoma

Who’s Really in Charge of Zambia? It’s a simple question—but in this moment of national grief, the answer feels anything but simple.

The passing of former President Edgar Lungu has rocked the foundations of Zambian politics. Beyond revitalizing the Patriotic Front (PF), it has exposed something far more troubling–the staggering fragility of President Hakainde Hichilema’s leadership. For all the talk of a “New Dawn,” what we are witnessing is a presidency adrift—disconnected from the pulse of the people, paralyzed in the face of crisis, and steeped in a self-assurance that no longer carries power.

For nearly four years, President Hichilema has governed with an executive arrogance that insulated him from political reality. Didn’t he know it all? Surrounded by loyalists, he convinced himself that he alone set the national mood—that the Bally of 2021 still commanded affection and authority. But the nation’s reaction to President Lungu’s death shattered that illusion.

He expected a river of PF tears—what he got was an ocean of national grief. The spontaneous gatherings, the overwhelming nostalgia, the heartfelt mourning—these weren’t partisan theatrics. They were real. Indeed, Hichilema was utterly unprepared for them.

More troubling still is the leadership vacuum this death has revealed. Instead of stepping in with a unifying presence, the President and his allies have turned to clergy and civil society to do what he should have done himself–bring political rivals to the table to mourn Lungu. That task should never have fallen on the bishops. Bridge-building is not the clergy’s calling—it is the sacred duty of a President who truly leads.

Yet here we are. The President, consumed by pride, is sidelined by his own refusal to listen. He clings to sycophants while ignoring the public mood, isolating himself from the very people he claims to serve. There is no vision. No plan. No emotional resonance with a grieving nation.

True leadership means more than dismissing critics. It means reading the room, sensing the soul of the country, and adjusting course when the winds change. Had Hichilema paid attention to the mounting admiration for Lungu, he might have used this moment for reconciliation, for healing, for unity. Instead, he chose denial—believing the chants were staged, the crowds manufactured, and his own popularity invincible. It was a costly delusion.

Today, his government is scrambling. Ministers once brimming with confidence are now pleading for unity. Belvedere Lodge, declared as the official mourning place is empty–a ghostly testament to a presidency that has lost its way. “Come mourn your beloved President… the one you loved so much,” they now plead—words of desperation, not authority. Yet nobody heeds those words to save UPND cadres–making fools of themselves.

This is more than a political crisis; it’s a national reckoning. If Zambia is to face the coming campaign season with dignity and peace, it must begin with leadership rooted not in narcissistic ego, but in empathy.

That said, I am an optimist. I believe this crisis could yet be a turning point. If President Hichilema can summon the humility to admit mistakes, to re-engage with all Zambians—not just his loyal base—he can begin the long walk back to trust. But it starts with reflection and understanding that no President governs alone. Zambia is not the private property of Community House. It belongs to the people—and the opposition is part of those people.

Mr. President, look in the mirror. Don’t just listen to your cadres. Don’t rule with pride—lead with humility. Become the President for all Zambians. Because in the end, leadership is not about being obeyed—it’s about being trusted, loved, and believed.

Right now, you’ve lost all three. It’s up to you to win them back.

In the Silence of a President: The Pain We Refuse to See

In the Silence of a President: The Pain We Refuse to See

By Mambo Tembo

In moments of national grief, we often seek voices strong, comforting, or even apologetic. But when those voices go silent, we are quick to fill the void with anger, suspicion, or judgment. Yet silence is not always indifference. Sometimes, silence is the heaviest burden a man can carry and perhaps today, that burden rests squarely on the shoulders of President Hakainde Hichilema.

Zambia is mourning not only the death of its Sixth Republican President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu, but also the symbolic death of a reconciliation that never came to pass. The President’s silence in this moment is not a declaration of coldness or hatred. It is, perhaps, a reflection of the complexity of emotions political, personal, and deeply human.

We must remember, President Hichilema did not just lose a political rival. He lost a man with whom history entwined his own. Their story full of rivalry, tension, and political stratagem was, at its core, a tale of two leaders bound by destiny and divided by ideology. And now, one is gone, and the other remains  haunted not just by what was done, but by what was never said.

Can you imagine the ache of that silence? The weight of unsaid words, unextended hands, unhealed wounds? We often forget that presidents are also people, and people feel. Behind closed doors, in the quiet corners of the State House, there may be tears that will never reach the public eye. There may be private prayers for a man whose public relationship was fraught, but whose departure has left a profound emptiness.

Many Zambians, understandably, are pained by what they see as delayed compassion. But have we considered that the President’s silence may be his deepest expression of sorrow? That perhaps he is mourning in the way men sometimes do quietly, painfully, and privately? Politics demanded they never show weakness. Now, death demands they show humanity.

It is easy to forget that beyond his role as Head of State, HH is a man, flawed, emotional, perhaps even regretful. It’s possible that deep inside, he carries the weight of missed chances: a handshake never offered, an apology never made, a final moment of mutual respect denied by the unrelenting grip of political gamesmanship. Perhaps the thought that he might have reconciled with ECL  not for cameras or campaigns, but for peace of heart, now stings more than any criticism ever could.

There are nights, perhaps, when he sits in the dark with the flicker of memory hearing old speeches, remembering fierce debates, or recalling the way the crowd would roar at ECL’s mention. What a paradox it must be: to have politically battled a man with all the might of the State, only to now quietly wish for one more moment to say something… anything… human.

This is not a call to excuse the past. There are valid grievances about how Edgar Lungu was treated. But it is a plea to recognize the human tragedy that overshadows the political one. HH is not gloating. He is grieving. And grief, unlike policy, cannot be timed or scripted.

Tyler Perry’s Straw reminds us how people can find themselves trapped in consequences they never intended. Perhaps HH now stands at that very crossroad , where politics ends and conscience begins. A man reflecting not on power, but on humanity. And perhaps, when time softens the sting, he will speak, maybe even apologise not as a President, but as a person.

Until then, Zambia must rise above its divisions. To mourn Edgar Lungu is to honour not just his legacy but the dignity of reconciliation we failed to achieve. And to understand HH’s silence is to acknowledge that sometimes, the deepest pain is the one that cannot be spoken.

So let us hold back from weaponising our sorrow. Let us not use death to score points in the game of survival. Let us reach for our shared Zambian soul  one built on ubuntu, one drenched in compassion, one that knows the meaning of crying together even when we disagree. One Embodied in ONE ZAMBIA, ONE NATION.

Let us grieve as one nation. Let us forgive. And let us hope that from this sorrow, a more compassionate Zambia will rise , one where silence is not feared, but understood.

M’membe Accuses Hichilema Government of Hypocrisy and Arrogance

M’membe Accuses Hichilema Government of Hypocrisy and Arrogance

Lusaka, Zambia – June 10, 2025 — In a strongly worded statement, Socialist Party President Fred M’membe has launched a blistering critique of President Hakainde Hichilema and his United Party for National Development (UPND), accusing the administration of deep-seated hypocrisy, political manipulation, and moral detachment from the Zambian people.

In a post titled “ZAMBIA TWASEBANA!” — meaning “Zambia, we have embarrassed ourselves!” — M’membe expressed grave concern over what he termed “a dangerous political culture” rooted in arrogance and denial. According to him, the current leadership portrays itself as intellectually superior, leaving no room for dissent, humility, or introspection.

“With Mr Hichilema and his league, everybody else is expected to remain silent, blind, and domesticated like animals,” M’membe stated, denouncing what he believes is a deliberate silencing of alternative voices.

He accused the UPND of engaging in “manipulation, deflection and denial,” suggesting that the ruling party often shifts blame to victims instead of taking accountability. “Even when publicly called out,” he added, “they offer no explanations, empathy, or apologies  only more deflection.”

The opposition leader’s remarks come amid rising public frustration over perceived insensitivity and governance shortcomings. While the government has not responded directly to M’membe’s latest remarks, UPND officials in recent days have dismissed similar criticisms as politically motivated and unsubstantiated.

However, M’membe insists this is more than political rivalry, it’s a moral crisis.

“It is deeply unfortunate that a country as hopeful and promising as Zambia is being led by people who seem so detached from the basic tenets of humanity, justice, and truth,” he lamented.

Calling for what he termed a “return to conscience leadership,” M’membe urged citizens to demand a leadership style that prioritizes compassion, humility, and moral integrity.

This is not the first time the Socialist Party has publicly condemned the UPND. M’membe has long positioned himself as a vocal critic of what he sees as the neoliberal elitism of the current administration. But this latest message , invoking God, conscience, and national shame is among his most emotionally charged yet.

As Zambia continues to navigate economic hardship, rising inequality, and political polarization, such statements reflect a broader debate over the country’s direction and the credibility of those in power.

“May God help Zambia,” M’membe concluded, placing the burden not just on leaders but on a society grappling with what kind of nation it wants to become.

Government Refutes Allegations, Urges Dignified Mourning for Former President Lungu

27

The Minister of Information and Media and Chief Government Spokesperson, Hon. Cornelius Mweetwa, MP, held a press briefing addressing what he described as misinformation and politicization surrounding the death of Zambia’s former President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

Speaking at the briefing, Hon. Mweetwa confirmed that the government is actively engaging with the family of the late President to ensure that all funeral arrangements and protocols align with the family’s wishes. He stressed the importance of granting the late leader a “befitting and dignified send-off.”

However, the Minister expressed deep regret that some members of the Patriotic Front (PF), the former ruling party, are using the funeral period to engage in what he called a “political fiesta,” turning national mourning into a platform for squabbles and political point-scoring.

“It is unfortunate that the PF leadership is attempting to use the passing of President Lungu as a political springboard to gain relevance,” Mweetwa said, calling on all national leaders to exercise restraint and leadership in keeping with Zambia’s values as a Christian nation.

On Allegations Surrounding Medical Evacuation

Responding to claims that former President Lungu’s death could have been avoided had he not faced delays in medical evacuation, Mweetwa clarified that there was never any travel ban imposed by the government.

He further criticized the PF for what he described as double standards: “When our Ministry disclosed that the former President was undergoing chemotherapy, there were immediate threats of legal action, and yet now they admit he was seriously ill. This is deeply contradictory.”

On Withdrawal of Presidential Entitlements

Addressing another contentious issue, the Minister firmly denied that the government withdrew any entitlements that were legally due to the former President. He emphasized that Lungu enjoyed full benefits following his written declaration of retirement from active politics.

“According to Chapter 15, Section 5 of the Laws of Zambia, a former president who returns to active politics forfeits those benefits. President Lungu himself triggered this provision by resuming political activities,” Mweetwa explained.

He also noted that Lungu is the only former President in Zambia’s history whose immunity was not lifted after leaving office—a point he said underscores President Hichilema’s commitment to democratic norms.

On Rumors of Poisoning and Repatriation
The Minister categorically dismissed allegations that the late President may have been poisoned or that Zambian agents stormed a South African medical facility to retrieve his remains.

“If any such incident occurred, the Government of the Republic of Zambia is not aware and certainly did not authorize it,” he said. He condemned the allegations as “highly misplaced and a misrepresentation of the Zambian way of handling national grievances.”

Appeal for Calm and Responsible Reporting

Hon. Mweetwa concluded by urging both the local and international media to treat statements from certain PF leaders with caution, noting that not all are rooted in fact.

“As a country, we cannot allow inflammatory statements to promote anarchy. We call upon all Zambians to remain calm and unified during this difficult period, and to give our late former President the respect and honour he deserves,” he said.

President Lungu’s death has marked a solemn period for the country. A seven-day national mourning period has been declared from June 8 to June 14, 2025.

Where Is the Church in the Edgar Lungu Funeral Impasse?

19

By Gregory Mofu

Zambia is mourning the passing of its 6th Republican President, Dr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu. But instead of a united front in grief and dignity, the country is witnessing a deepening impasse between the Government and the Patriotic Front (PF) over funeral proceedings. What should be a solemn national moment is being overshadowed by political conflict and division.

In the face of this tension, we must ask: Where is the Church?

President Lungu was not just a political leader—he was a man of faith, known for his close relationship with the Church. Throughout his presidency, he openly leaned on the Church for guidance, partnership, and moral support. It is only fitting that in his passing, the Church should rise up to honor him—not just in word, but in action.

Now, as this crisis unfolds, we believe that President Lungu, even in death, is looking to the Church—his Church—to help restore calm, dignity, and unity to this process. The silence from our religious leaders is not just disappointing; it is dangerous.

When moral voices fall silent, political actors—unchecked and unaccountable—can lead a nation down a dark path. We need not look far for a chilling reminder. In 1994, Rwanda’s peace was shattered by political division and unchecked rhetoric. Many of those who could have spoken up stayed silent, and the result was a genocide that claimed over 800,000 lives.

Zambia has always been a peaceful, God-fearing nation—but peace must be protected. The politicians we are leaving to fight unchecked today could burn this country tomorrow, just like their ideological “twins” did in Rwanda.

We call on the Church to stand up now.
Speak peace. Call for unity. Bring both the Government and the opposition to the table. Zambia is not the property of politicians—it belongs to God and His people.

If the Church does not rise now, it may find itself trying to pray over ashes tomorrow.

Lungu’s Death Sparks Political Firestorm as PF Accuses Government of Mistreatment

Lungu’s Death Sparks Political Firestorm as PF Accuses Government of Mistreatment
The death of former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has plunged the country into a period of mourning and political tension, as Patriotic Front (PF) Secretary General Rafael Nakacinda accuses the current regime of subjecting Lungu to humiliation and obstruction that may have hastened his death. With Lungu’s remains still in South Africa, a public dispute over repatriation has erupted between the government and the late leader’s family.

Lungu died at the age of 68 in Pretoria, South Africa, where he was receiving treatment for achalasia, a condition affecting the esophagus. Zambia has declared seven days of national mourning from June 8 to 14, ordering flags at half-mast and suspending entertainment activities.

Yet behind the official solemnity lies a deep political rift. Nakacinda, who is currently in South Africa with the family, contends that Lungu’s death could have been avoided had the government not denied him medical freedom. He alleges that for years, the former president’s access to routine treatment was obstructed by politically motivated restrictions.

Nakacinda claims that after leaving office in 2021, Lungu made several unsuccessful attempts to seek medical attention abroad, often being blocked or delayed by the authorities. “In 2022, he indicated he needed to travel for his usual medical reviews,” Nakacinda recounted. “Government said they had no money, even when he offered to pay from his own resources.”

In one incident, Lungu was reportedly removed from a plane by law enforcement agents. Only in late 2024, under the watch of a visiting UN rapporteur investigating human rights conditions in Zambia, was he able to discreetly leave for South Africa. Upon arrival, doctors informed him that had he come earlier, his prognosis might have been different.

The PF alleges that the government’s current posture, leading the repatriation and funeral plans, is disingenuous and politically opportunistic. Nakacinda says the family initially planned to handle the process independently, even financing it through well-wishers, until government ministers abruptly intervened.

“The family was shocked to find Foreign Affairs Minister Mulambo Haimbe arriving and declaring the body would be taken back the next day, without prior agreement,” Nakacinda said. “They treated him like an ordinary person in life and now want to treat him like a statesman in death, to cleanse their record.”

 

He insists the family still has unanswered questions and is conducting additional procedures before the remains are returned. A postmortem has been requested to clarify the exact cause of death, amid speculative reports suggesting the possibility of poisoning an allegation Nakacinda did not confirm but said merited thorough examination.

Edgar Lungu, who served as Zambia’s sixth president from 2015 to 2021, left office following a defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema. His post-presidency was marked by legal probes, asset seizures, and political isolation. While the government maintained it was pursuing justice, his allies viewed it as targeted persecution.

Nakacinda accuses the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) of harboring “paranoia” over a possible Lungu comeback in 2026 a speculation that, though unconfirmed, hung over much of the opposition discourse in recent years.

As the country observes national mourning, the impasse between the government and the Lungu family remains unresolved. Nakacinda warns that unless the government acknowledges its role in what he describes as Lungu’s “humiliation until death,” the situation could become a national embarrassment.

“The government is rushing to impose a seven-day mourning period,” he said. “But what if the body isn’t repatriated by then? Are they mourning a person or managing political optics?”

Lungu’s passing was expected to be a unifying moment, but it has instead spotlighted deep fractures in Zambia’s political landscape. Whether the coming days will bring reconciliation or further division depends not only on how the former president is honored, but on whether those in power are willing to confront the accusations of neglect, obstruction, and politicization leveled against them.

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

By Mathew Mukuluta

The passing of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has ignited national mourning and an equally deep constitutional debate. While the Zambian government has accorded him a state funeral with full honors, his supporters allege that his treatment in life stood in sharp contrast to this show of respect in death. The moment demands not just mourning, but an honest national reckoning with how we treat former leaders, what rights remain sacred, and how to legislate more fairly for the future.

When Edgar Lungu re-entered the political arena after his presidency, the state moved swiftly to suspend his benefits under the Benefits of Former Presidents Act, Cap 15, Section 3(3). Legally, the government was within its rights. The law clearly states that once a former president resumes active politics, their entitlements may be withdrawn. However, this legality did not soften the perception of hostility. To many Zambians, it felt like political retaliation rather than the impartial application of law.

What followed proved far more contentious. When Lungu sought medical attention abroad for a recurring condition, achalasia, he was repeatedly denied travel clearance. Despite offering to fund the trips privately, he was blocked, once even reportedly removed from a plane by state agents. This action had no constitutional grounding. Lungu was neither convicted nor on trial, and no legal basis existed to bar his movements. That decision was not just bureaucratic overreach; it was a human rights violation that placed politics above dignity, law, and life.

Years later, in late 2024, it was only the arrival of a United Nations human rights rapporteur in Zambia that allowed Lungu to leave the country without obstruction. He discreetly traveled to South Africa for treatment, only to be informed by doctors that his situation had worsened due to delays. He fought bravely, undergoing rigorous therapy, but ultimately succumbed in last week (june 2025). Had he received timely care, some specialists suggested, his fate might have been different.

In a dramatic reversal, the state has since moved to grant Lungu full honors, declaring a seven-day national mourning period and organizing a state funeral. This is entirely within the law. Once a former president passes away, political activity ceases, and all entitlements are automatically restored. Yet the about-face has left many, including Lungu’s family and the Patriotic Front, feeling bitter. They argue that the government’s eagerness to lead the funeral is a political cleanup, not a genuine gesture of respect.

This tension has led to a standoff. Lungu’s remains remain in South Africa, with his family questioning both the circumstances of his death and the government’s role in managing his repatriation. Rumors of medical neglect, and even poisoning, have surfaced, prompting calls for independent examinations. While no official cause beyond his preexisting condition has been confirmed, the family’s demand for transparency is reasonable, not political.

Still, this delicate moment must not spiral into partisan acrimony. The Lungu family, despite their justified grievances, may find healing in allowing the state to facilitate a respectful national farewell. Meanwhile, the government must confront its past actions with humility. A sincere public apology, not for political optics, but for wrongfully restricting Lungu’s fundamental right to medical care, could go a long way in mending national wounds.

More importantly, this episode should spur legal reform. Zambia must craft clearer laws governing how former presidents are treated if they return to politics. All-or-nothing policies that strip them of critical protections, including healthcare and travel rights, are too blunt and too dangerous. A refined legal framework one that distinguishes political engagement from vindictive retaliation, is urgently needed.

The death of Edgar Lungu is a moment of national sorrow, but it is also a moment of national instruction. It teaches us that even in political rivalry, dignity must prevail. That justice must be tempered with compassion. And that legal clarity is not a luxury it is a safeguard for democracy.

As Zambia moves forward, may its leaders, on all sides, rise to the occasion. Let this be a chapter not just of grief, but of wisdom. Let the late President Lungu’s story be the catalyst for a fairer, more humane Zambia.

Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism


Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism

Clayson Hamasaka, a senior government official, has pushed back against sustained criticism from Zambia’s opposition, stating that the ruling party remains undeterred by political attacks and is focused on delivering national development. He argued that achievements such as free education and new mine openings speak for themselves, even in the absence of praise from opponents.

In a political climate often defined by opposition criticism and ruling party defense, Hamasaka’s comments underscore the growing chasm between Zambia’s major political blocs. “You do not expect the opposition to praise the president,” he said. “Actually, they are condemning free education. They say we have compromised education quality.”

This dynamic, he argues, reveals a contradiction: programs that directly benefit citizens are being politicized rather than debated constructively. “If they are going to condemn free education, are they going to remove it?” he asked. “If they are condemning us for opening mines, what is their alternative?”

Hamasaka’s statements come as the government defends several high-profile reforms, including universal primary and secondary education, economic stabilization efforts, and the revival of key mining operations. While these initiatives have garnered support from international donors and development partners, the opposition has remained largely critical, arguing that implementation lacks quality, oversight, or sustainability.

Analysts say the polarized rhetoric reflects deeper systemic issues. “In Zambia, opposition tends to define itself by confrontation rather than policy alternatives,” says Dr. Loveness Silungwe, a political scientist at the University of Zambia. “This impedes constructive democratic discourse and keeps voters in a cycle of confusion and cynicism.”

The introduction of free education in 2022 was one of President Hakainde Hichilema’s landmark pledges. It aimed to eliminate school fees for primary and secondary education, thereby improving access for children from low-income families. Despite its positive impact, critics argue the policy has stretched teaching resources and compromised classroom quality.

Government officials maintain that the challenges are transitional. “Yes, there are issues, but it’s a bold step towards equitable development,” said Education Minister Douglas Syakalima during a recent press briefing. He pointed to record enrollment numbers as evidence of success.


Zambia, a major copper producer, is also working to revive stalled or underperforming mines to boost production and foreign earnings. Hamasaka sees this as a key success under the current administration, even as the opposition questions ownership structures, licensing transparency, and labor conditions.

“We’ve created jobs and increased investor confidence,” Hamasaka stressed. “But all the opposition sees is an opportunity to discredit our efforts.”

Experts argue that while skepticism is a healthy component of democracy, it must be matched by solutions. “It’s not enough to say the government is failing,” said governance expert Choolwe Mweetwa. “The opposition must offer clear policy alternative show they would do things better, not just differently.”

The current tone of political debate, marked by accusations and defensiveness, risks alienating voters who seek pragmatic leadership over rhetorical battles.

Hamasaka’s message is clear: the ruling party does not expect applause from its opponents, but it demands fair critique rooted in facts and national interest. As Zambia heads into another election cycle, the maturity of its democracy will hinge not on applause or antagonism, but on the quality and integrity of its public debate.

“Impact of Free Education Policy: Enrollment Before and After (2021–2024)”

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls – Birsek Phiri

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls, Says Political Commentator

With less than a year to Zambia’s 2026 general elections, political analyst Birsek Phiri has raised concerns over the apparent disarray and lack of constructive engagement within the opposition, warning that the nation risks losing focus on critical governance issues if political players prioritize power over national interest.

As Zambia edges closer to the 2026 general elections, a familiar refrain is echoing across political discourse: the opposition appears more preoccupied with criticizing the ruling party than offering viable alternatives. Birsek Phiri, a respected political commentator, argues that this dynamic reflects a deeper weakness in the political system one where opposition parties engage more in antagonism than in articulating sound policy visions.

“When you look at the opposition itself, they are not very strong,” Phiri remarked, noting that despite the proximity to the polls, there is still no clear opposition figure rallying national momentum. “We are less than a year away, and it is not yet clear who the opposition can put forward as a viable candidate.”

Phiri emphasized the need for the opposition to transcend mere opposition for its own sake. “They should be looking more in terms of what is good for this nation, not what is good for a political party in power today,” he said.

This sentiment resonates in a context where Zambia’s young democracy has often been punctuated by electoral cycles characterized by intense political rivalry, personality-driven campaigns, and populist rhetoric. Analysts say the stakes are high in 2026, not just for parties vying for power, but for Zambia’s broader trajectory on issues like economic recovery, corruption, and democratic accountability.

Zambia’s 2021 elections ushered in President Hakainde Hichilema of the United Party for National Development (UPND), ending the decade-long rule of the Patriotic Front (PF). Though the transition was peaceful and democratic, it came with expectations for swift economic revival and institutional reform. Three years on, the ruling party is under pressure to deliver on promises related to employment, economic stability, and debt restructuring.

Meanwhile, the opposition, especially the PF, is grappling with internal divisions, leadership wrangles, and allegations of impropriety. Political observers argue that the PF has struggled to regain coherence following the 2021 loss and has failed to rebrand or present a compelling alternative policy agenda.

Phiri’s comments serve as a caution to all political players, both ruling and opposition, to shift away from rhetoric that deepens division. The frequent declarations by opposition leaders vowing to “reverse” government policies if elected, he warns, risk creating a climate of instability and policy discontinuity.

“This idea of ‘when we come to power, we will change everything’ is not how a nation should function,” Phiri said. “We need continuity where necessary, and debate that is rooted in facts and national progress.”

Experts agree that Zambia’s democratic maturity depends heavily on the quality of political debate and the presence of a credible opposition. “Democracy thrives on contestation,” says political analyst Dr. Judith Mwansa of the University of Zambia, “but that contest must be issue-based. If the opposition is disorganized, citizens are deprived of meaningful choices.”

Moreover, with the global economic climate remaining uncertain and Zambia’s own fiscal reforms underway, including negotiations with the IMF and debt restructuring deals, political stability and policy clarity will be critical in attracting investment and maintaining growth.

As Zambia approaches a crucial electoral milestone, the strength of its democratic institutions will be tested not just by the ballot but by the quality of leadership and political discourse leading up to it. Phiri’s message is clear: for Zambia to progress, both ruling and opposition parties must prioritize the national interest over partisan gain.