Saturday, June 28, 2025
Subscribe
Home Blog Page 6

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

Lusaka Times Editor
-
11
Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

By Mathew Mukuluta

The passing of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has ignited national mourning and an equally deep constitutional debate. While the Zambian government has accorded him a state funeral with full honors, his supporters allege that his treatment in life stood in sharp contrast to this show of respect in death. The moment demands not just mourning, but an honest national reckoning with how we treat former leaders, what rights remain sacred, and how to legislate more fairly for the future.

When Edgar Lungu re-entered the political arena after his presidency, the state moved swiftly to suspend his benefits under the Benefits of Former Presidents Act, Cap 15, Section 3(3). Legally, the government was within its rights. The law clearly states that once a former president resumes active politics, their entitlements may be withdrawn. However, this legality did not soften the perception of hostility. To many Zambians, it felt like political retaliation rather than the impartial application of law.

What followed proved far more contentious. When Lungu sought medical attention abroad for a recurring condition, achalasia, he was repeatedly denied travel clearance. Despite offering to fund the trips privately, he was blocked, once even reportedly removed from a plane by state agents. This action had no constitutional grounding. Lungu was neither convicted nor on trial, and no legal basis existed to bar his movements. That decision was not just bureaucratic overreach; it was a human rights violation that placed politics above dignity, law, and life.

Years later, in late 2024, it was only the arrival of a United Nations human rights rapporteur in Zambia that allowed Lungu to leave the country without obstruction. He discreetly traveled to South Africa for treatment, only to be informed by doctors that his situation had worsened due to delays. He fought bravely, undergoing rigorous therapy, but ultimately succumbed in last week (june 2025). Had he received timely care, some specialists suggested, his fate might have been different.

In a dramatic reversal, the state has since moved to grant Lungu full honors, declaring a seven-day national mourning period and organizing a state funeral. This is entirely within the law. Once a former president passes away, political activity ceases, and all entitlements are automatically restored. Yet the about-face has left many, including Lungu’s family and the Patriotic Front, feeling bitter. They argue that the government’s eagerness to lead the funeral is a political cleanup, not a genuine gesture of respect.

This tension has led to a standoff. Lungu’s remains remain in South Africa, with his family questioning both the circumstances of his death and the government’s role in managing his repatriation. Rumors of medical neglect, and even poisoning, have surfaced, prompting calls for independent examinations. While no official cause beyond his preexisting condition has been confirmed, the family’s demand for transparency is reasonable, not political.

Still, this delicate moment must not spiral into partisan acrimony. The Lungu family, despite their justified grievances, may find healing in allowing the state to facilitate a respectful national farewell. Meanwhile, the government must confront its past actions with humility. A sincere public apology, not for political optics, but for wrongfully restricting Lungu’s fundamental right to medical care, could go a long way in mending national wounds.

More importantly, this episode should spur legal reform. Zambia must craft clearer laws governing how former presidents are treated if they return to politics. All-or-nothing policies that strip them of critical protections, including healthcare and travel rights, are too blunt and too dangerous. A refined legal framework one that distinguishes political engagement from vindictive retaliation, is urgently needed.

The death of Edgar Lungu is a moment of national sorrow, but it is also a moment of national instruction. It teaches us that even in political rivalry, dignity must prevail. That justice must be tempered with compassion. And that legal clarity is not a luxury it is a safeguard for democracy.

As Zambia moves forward, may its leaders, on all sides, rise to the occasion. Let this be a chapter not just of grief, but of wisdom. Let the late President Lungu’s story be the catalyst for a fairer, more humane Zambia.

Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism

Lusaka Times Editor
-
8
Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism


Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism

Clayson Hamasaka, a senior government official, has pushed back against sustained criticism from Zambia’s opposition, stating that the ruling party remains undeterred by political attacks and is focused on delivering national development. He argued that achievements such as free education and new mine openings speak for themselves, even in the absence of praise from opponents.

In a political climate often defined by opposition criticism and ruling party defense, Hamasaka’s comments underscore the growing chasm between Zambia’s major political blocs. “You do not expect the opposition to praise the president,” he said. “Actually, they are condemning free education. They say we have compromised education quality.”

This dynamic, he argues, reveals a contradiction: programs that directly benefit citizens are being politicized rather than debated constructively. “If they are going to condemn free education, are they going to remove it?” he asked. “If they are condemning us for opening mines, what is their alternative?”

Hamasaka’s statements come as the government defends several high-profile reforms, including universal primary and secondary education, economic stabilization efforts, and the revival of key mining operations. While these initiatives have garnered support from international donors and development partners, the opposition has remained largely critical, arguing that implementation lacks quality, oversight, or sustainability.

Analysts say the polarized rhetoric reflects deeper systemic issues. “In Zambia, opposition tends to define itself by confrontation rather than policy alternatives,” says Dr. Loveness Silungwe, a political scientist at the University of Zambia. “This impedes constructive democratic discourse and keeps voters in a cycle of confusion and cynicism.”

The introduction of free education in 2022 was one of President Hakainde Hichilema’s landmark pledges. It aimed to eliminate school fees for primary and secondary education, thereby improving access for children from low-income families. Despite its positive impact, critics argue the policy has stretched teaching resources and compromised classroom quality.

Government officials maintain that the challenges are transitional. “Yes, there are issues, but it’s a bold step towards equitable development,” said Education Minister Douglas Syakalima during a recent press briefing. He pointed to record enrollment numbers as evidence of success.


Zambia, a major copper producer, is also working to revive stalled or underperforming mines to boost production and foreign earnings. Hamasaka sees this as a key success under the current administration, even as the opposition questions ownership structures, licensing transparency, and labor conditions.

“We’ve created jobs and increased investor confidence,” Hamasaka stressed. “But all the opposition sees is an opportunity to discredit our efforts.”

Experts argue that while skepticism is a healthy component of democracy, it must be matched by solutions. “It’s not enough to say the government is failing,” said governance expert Choolwe Mweetwa. “The opposition must offer clear policy alternative show they would do things better, not just differently.”

The current tone of political debate, marked by accusations and defensiveness, risks alienating voters who seek pragmatic leadership over rhetorical battles.

Hamasaka’s message is clear: the ruling party does not expect applause from its opponents, but it demands fair critique rooted in facts and national interest. As Zambia heads into another election cycle, the maturity of its democracy will hinge not on applause or antagonism, but on the quality and integrity of its public debate.

“Impact of Free Education Policy: Enrollment Before and After (2021–2024)”

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls – Birsek Phiri

Lusaka Times Editor
-
2
Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls – Birsek Phiri

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls, Says Political Commentator

With less than a year to Zambia’s 2026 general elections, political analyst Birsek Phiri has raised concerns over the apparent disarray and lack of constructive engagement within the opposition, warning that the nation risks losing focus on critical governance issues if political players prioritize power over national interest.

As Zambia edges closer to the 2026 general elections, a familiar refrain is echoing across political discourse: the opposition appears more preoccupied with criticizing the ruling party than offering viable alternatives. Birsek Phiri, a respected political commentator, argues that this dynamic reflects a deeper weakness in the political system one where opposition parties engage more in antagonism than in articulating sound policy visions.

“When you look at the opposition itself, they are not very strong,” Phiri remarked, noting that despite the proximity to the polls, there is still no clear opposition figure rallying national momentum. “We are less than a year away, and it is not yet clear who the opposition can put forward as a viable candidate.”

Phiri emphasized the need for the opposition to transcend mere opposition for its own sake. “They should be looking more in terms of what is good for this nation, not what is good for a political party in power today,” he said.

This sentiment resonates in a context where Zambia’s young democracy has often been punctuated by electoral cycles characterized by intense political rivalry, personality-driven campaigns, and populist rhetoric. Analysts say the stakes are high in 2026, not just for parties vying for power, but for Zambia’s broader trajectory on issues like economic recovery, corruption, and democratic accountability.

Zambia’s 2021 elections ushered in President Hakainde Hichilema of the United Party for National Development (UPND), ending the decade-long rule of the Patriotic Front (PF). Though the transition was peaceful and democratic, it came with expectations for swift economic revival and institutional reform. Three years on, the ruling party is under pressure to deliver on promises related to employment, economic stability, and debt restructuring.

Meanwhile, the opposition, especially the PF, is grappling with internal divisions, leadership wrangles, and allegations of impropriety. Political observers argue that the PF has struggled to regain coherence following the 2021 loss and has failed to rebrand or present a compelling alternative policy agenda.

Phiri’s comments serve as a caution to all political players, both ruling and opposition, to shift away from rhetoric that deepens division. The frequent declarations by opposition leaders vowing to “reverse” government policies if elected, he warns, risk creating a climate of instability and policy discontinuity.

“This idea of ‘when we come to power, we will change everything’ is not how a nation should function,” Phiri said. “We need continuity where necessary, and debate that is rooted in facts and national progress.”

Experts agree that Zambia’s democratic maturity depends heavily on the quality of political debate and the presence of a credible opposition. “Democracy thrives on contestation,” says political analyst Dr. Judith Mwansa of the University of Zambia, “but that contest must be issue-based. If the opposition is disorganized, citizens are deprived of meaningful choices.”

Moreover, with the global economic climate remaining uncertain and Zambia’s own fiscal reforms underway, including negotiations with the IMF and debt restructuring deals, political stability and policy clarity will be critical in attracting investment and maintaining growth.

As Zambia approaches a crucial electoral milestone, the strength of its democratic institutions will be tested not just by the ballot but by the quality of leadership and political discourse leading up to it. Phiri’s message is clear: for Zambia to progress, both ruling and opposition parties must prioritize the national interest over partisan gain.

My Walk With Edgar- Sikota

Chief Editor
-
5
My Walk With Edgar- Sikota

The loss of the Sixth Republican President Dr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu has hit every person in Zambia. The United Liberal Party, of which I am president, has already put out a message of condolences to the bereaved family, party and nation.

This piece is not a formal but individual reflection on someone I had a very long and personal relationship. It is recollections of some of the interactions I had with the dearly departed Edgar Chagwa Lungu .

THE BEGINNING OF THE WALK WITH EDGAR

I first came across sixth Republican President Edgar Chagwa Lungu in 1982 when he was still commonly called, “Edgar”.

To the end of his life I would refer to him as “Edgar” whenever we were alone or with his wife Esther. When in public or formally addressing him I would refer to him as “Your Excellency” or “Mr. President”. This is how comfortable we were with each other and how I recognized that my private relationship should only be shown when only in his presence or that of his wife.

His accepting me to call him Edgar in private also shows that the title of President did not go to his head and he realized that it is not the title but how you interact with people that makes you what you are.

Riches and fame cannot surpass a good soul. What he had in abundance was a good soul.

I first got acquainted with Edgar in 1982 when he was a learner Legal Practitioner at the Law Practice Institute and I was lecturing at the National Institute of Public Administration.

He was jovial and easy going making it easy for him to strike up friendships. What was also clear was that he had a very sharp mind.

When he was in the legal department of ZCCM and I was with then Chilanga and Company he would let us have some legal instructions from the mining conglomerate.

When he was contemplating stopping being in house counsel and going into private practice he asked me what I thought as I had been in private practice since 1983. I encouraged him to take the plunge which he did and joined Andrea Masiye and Co.

In 1995 I went with Edgar and also Late a Josephine Nyirongo, the then Treasurer of the Law Association of Zambia, on a seven week program in six different States in the USA to work in various different types of State legal aid systems. Edgar was a stand out participant during our tour. Edgar was already my friend but that seven weeks of close daily (and nightly) interaction cemented our bond even further.

In 1996 Edgar asked me to help him campaign in the Chawama Constituency election where he stood as an independent candidate. I donated a very modest sum to his campaign and once or twice actually went out on the stomp with him in Chawama.

Edgar therefore gave me my first taste of politics by inviting me to be part of his campaign. It was also his first. It was an impressive baptism as he came in second to soon to become Vice President Christon Tembo.

This result was impressive when you took into account that he was the only independent in a field of five candidates where all his opponents were sponsored by political parties.

He managed to get 20% of the vote compared to Christon Tembo’s 55% because of how he easily interacted with the constituents. As one of his foot soldiers i observed how he walked through Chawama casually chatting with the voters he came across.

After this I got the feel for active politics and got involved in the formation of the United Party For National Development (UPND) in 1998. I was the UPND’s first Legal Chairman. I called upon Edgar and invited him to be in the legal subcommittee of UPND that I formed. He therefore agreed to be a committee member in the committee his Chawama campaign foot soldier (Saki) chaired.

As we went towards the 2001 election the elections committee of UPND decided to adopt someone else as the candidate despite of the work Edgar had done in Chawama. Edgar at the last minute stood as an independent but did not do as expected due to his late entry into the race.

After the Gabon football disaster I got instructions to represent the families of the fallen football heroes. It was a large number of people to deal with. I asked if he would be interested to take on the case together with me and he accepted.

I am glad he accepted because any lawyer will tell you that class action suits are the hardest to manage and run. His people and communication skills came in very handy to a very volatile set of clients. The majority were fine but the very vocal minority needed the tact and skill of Edgar to manage.

There would be immense drama and Edgar would manage to handle the unruly ones amongst them. One day a small number of the group brought a small coffin and left it at our offices.

Edgar said we could turn this spiteful act into a source of relief for someone. Edgar learnt of an indigent family who had lost a child and suggested we donate it to them. We did and this simple act by Edgar eased the burden for a grieving family. Edgar took ‘making lemonade out of lemons’ to a brand new higher level.

We were both operating from the city centre which was increasingly not conducive to business as parking was a headache and petty crime was spiraling. I decided to seek offices out of town and found flats at Addis Ababa Drive around about that were being sold.

I invited Edgar and four other law firms to join me in acquiring the property and moving out of Cairo Road. We formed a special vehicle company to acquire the building and have punctured the myth thatZambians cannot work in partnership together. Mr. Masiye, Speaker Nellie Mutti, Sixth Republican President and myself have been together for over years.

Clearly Edgar was someone willing to work with others. When he went into government and thought he would not have enough time to attend to the property company we formed, Edgar gave me power of attorney limited to the affairs of the property.

Over the years he was comfortable to just receive reports as to what was happening in the company. This showed he had faith in humanity and did not feel only he had the answers.

When I lost my father Edgar dealt with the settlement of dads estate as he was already known by my father and my siblings. He provided the legal service on the basis of being practically family.

In the 2016 Petition Edgar asked me to be in his legal team because we had worked together on different cases over the ages and he was comfortable that he would get commitment and professionalism. What was good about working for him as his lawyers is that although he was a very intelligent lawyer (who graduated with a merit from UNZA) he did not pretend to be a know it all but, he listened to his lawyers advise.

When the Dan Pule and three others eligibility case was commenced Edgar felt comfortable to give me instructions to be in his legal team for the same.

Inspite of Edgar being head of State at the time of the case, it was clear that he did not put any pressure on the judges presiding on the case as he genuinely did not know in what direction they would rule.

UKA was an idea centered on bringing like minded opposition parties to work together. From the time Edgar came back into active politics he made this his passionate dedication and desire. He therefore linked up with Chishala Kateka and late Edith Nawakwi who were of a similar view and desire.

Chishala and Late Edith had both separately discussed the idea of opposition unity but did not let out that Edgar was part of the scheme. Infact when Chishala first approached me in March 2022 Edgar was in retirement and had not come back to active politics.

The first formal meeting when the original UKA members met was at late Edith Nawakwi’s residence. Edgar, although acknowledged by all of us as being of a different status to us insisted that we feel free to interact with him without holding back simply because he was a former President.

Some took this to be open liscence and we had a constant struggle to try to keep some in proper line. Edgar was willing to give us room to try and counsel and guide some of our colleagues.

Edgar initially showed tolerance towards some who spoke out of turn and allowed us to try and counsel them. Edgar was very accommodating and tolerant but at some stage he felt he could no longer take what he referred to as “the little girl”. We tried our best to counsel the”little girl” but this proved very difficult. On this task I must admit that I failed Edgar on the mission of mellowing certain characters; not from lack of trying but because of dealing with one or two very complex characters.

The day before Edgar left for South Africa I had agreed with him that we would meet to discuss the happenings in PF, TONSE and UKA. He told me he would be going to the airport for a flight to South Africa to try and get some treatment. What is striking is that he said to me, “I know the State will not allow me to board the plane and leave as they always do, so I will drop in to see you on my way back from the airport after they turn me back.

Edgar thought they would scuttle his trip out for his medical as they always did but, his team managed to outsmart the State machinery and he slipped out of the country. It was however too late for the doctors to do a full remedial job to restore his health.

This was the last interaction I had in the walk with Edgar my friend, professional colleague, co counsel, lawyer, client, family friend, candidate I was foot soldier for, business partner, principal who gave me Power of Attorney, recruit into UPND, committee member in my sub committee, the person who nominated me to chair the UKA project, advisor; but most of all MY PRESIDENT.

In the end it is inescapable that, as Edgar leaves me and all of us and walks away to our Lord in Heaven, Edgar is still PRESIDENT.

MAY HIS EXCELLENCY DR. EDGAR CHAGWA LUNGU FINALLY BE ALLOWED TO REST IN PEACE

Mourn President Lungu With Dignity- Kavindele

Chief Editor
-
5
Mourn President Lungu With Dignity- Kavindele

Former Vice President Enoch Kavindele has urged Zambians to mourn the late former President Edgar Lungu in a dignified manner.
Mr Kavindele says that the late President Lungu served his time as a leader and peacefully handed over the instruments of power to President Hakainde Hichilema, a sign that another elected leader had to govern the country.

The former Vice President condemned those politicising former President Lungu’s funeral, stating that it was wrong to claim that President Lungu was only a leader of a particular political party.

ZANIS reports that speaking after signing in the book of condolence at Belvedere Lodge in Lusaka, Mr Kavindele stated that the whole nation has lost a man who served in the office of president, hence needs to be mourned by all Zambians.

“For only a section of political parties to claim that only they should be in-charge of the funeral is very wrong, we are being denied an opportunity to mourn a former President,” Mr Kavindele said.

He noted that President Lungu’s death was sudden as the nation was not aware of his medical visit to South Africa, but only to be informed of his passing on June 5th 2025 is heartbreaking for the country.

Meanwhile, United Party for National Development (UPND) Media Consultant, Oliver Shalala stated that politicians should respect one another especially in such a solemn moment when the country is mourning a man who dedicated his life to politics.

Stop the WITCHCRAFT mentality; no one has killed Lungu!

Chief Editor
-
5
Stop the WITCHCRAFT mentality; no one has killed Lungu!

We are quite reluctant to comment on the ongoing debate…..nay the drama surrounding the demise of 6th Republican President Edgar Lungu as we are still mourning the loss of our beloved mom.

However, after countlessly watching several individuals, be it high profile or ‘kabwangas’ (ordinary individuals) on Social Media and TV shamelessly put their warped reasoning and ignorance on display or indeed desperately try to score cheap political mileage from ba Lungu’s demise, we are left with little or no choice but share our humble opinion.

In our villages, most unfortunately, once death comes knocking on our doors, it doesn’t matter whether it’s HIV/AIDS that has consumed us or not, we immediately start searching for the nearest “granny” in the neighborhood and label them as witches responsibile for the death of our beloved ones! Punishment in such instances usually comes in the form of being ostracized from the rest of the community or capitalpunishment! Readers may be keen to learn that recently, an enraged mob descended on a home of an octogenarian, long accused of being a wizard, and savagely dismembered her body using primitive weapons after which they set her remains ablaze!

Unfortunately, such kind of behaviour or reasoning isn’t restricted to those in the villages…..even the elite….the so-called educated….including the clergy are still stuck with such backward witchcraft mentality! We can boast of a chain of degrees to our names…. put on costly designer outfits, drive fancy vehicles and live in mansions, but in reality still remain uncivilized…..savages at heart eagerly waiting for the best opportunity to cause harm to others.

Consider the conduct of members of the Patriotic Front in the recent days…..these are not ordinary folks from Chibolya compound, but highly educated individuals – academicians, lawyers, pastors and former cabinet ministers hell-bent on leading the crusade to point accusing fingers at those in government. Are they any better than those in the village?

When your time is up, it’s up bwana; none of us can dare escape death whether we are able to enjoy the luxury of the best medical facilities on earth or not. We shall give a few examples…. Levy Mwanawasa, our third Republican President was evacuated to France to be seen by some of the best surgeons, did he make it? Equally, when the condition of our 5th President, Micheal Sata, went on a downward spiral, he was whisked away to the United Kingdom, a country that undoubtedly prides itself with one of the best medical cares under the Sun, what happened next? Our founding father, Dr. Kenneth Kaunda couldn’t make it alive in South Africa either!

When PF cadres insist government must stay away from ba Lungu’s funeral, do they really understand the implications of this? Ba Lungu is former President; you obviously expect high profile dignitaries such as Presidents and former presidents etc to attend the funeral in honour of their departed colleague. Can the PF or indeed the family manage to take care of all the logistics – top-notch security, accommodation, transport etc? Can we please just stop the ‘nonsense’ and send-off the immediate past President in a dignified manner.

We rest our case…..

Prince Bill M Kaping’a
Political/Social Analyst
Zambezi

Hardened to Difficulties

Chief Editor
-
1
Hardened to Difficulties

Today’s Scripture

I will strengthen and harden you to difficulties, yes, I will help you.
Isaiah 41:10, AMPC

Hardened to Difficulties

Friend, if twenty years ago you faced some of the difficulties you face today, they would have defeated you. God knows what you can handle. As you keep passing these tests, He’s hardening you to difficulty. You’re getting stronger. Your faith is growing. Your endurance is increasing. Your spiritual muscles are being built up. The reason God is doing this is because there are awesome things in your future. God is taking you to a wide and spacious place. He’s going to enlarge your territories. But with greater influence comes greater giants. With greater blessings comes greater opposition. With greater favor comes greater persecution. If He didn’t harden you to difficulty, you couldn’t withstand what comes against you.

You may be going through some things today that aren’t fun. You may be uncomfortable, but you have to realize that God is not making you suffer. He’s working through the difficulty to deposit something inside you. He’s growing you up, getting you stronger, increasing your faith. Be encouraged that everything you are going through is necessary for where God is taking you.

A Prayer for Today

“Father, thank You that Your hand has been upon my life in so many ways, hardening me to difficulties, getting me stronger, growing me up. Thank You that You are making deposits in my life to help me withstand the enemy. I believe that You are preparing me for where You’re taking me. In Jesus’ Name, Amen.”

Zambia Declares Seven Days of National Mourning for Late Former President Edgar Lungu

Chief Editor
-
11
Zambia Declares Seven Days of National Mourning for Late Former President Edgar Lungu

President Hakainde Hichilema has declared a seven-day period of national mourning to honour the late former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, who passed away in South Africa on Thursday, June 5, 2025. The mourning period will begin on Sunday, June 8, and run through Saturday, June 14, 2025.

In a press briefing Secretary to the Cabinet Patrick Kangwa confirmed that the Government of the Republic of Zambia has accorded Mr. Lungu a state funeral, in accordance with national protocol and in recognition of his service as the country’s sixth President.

Mr. Kangwa informed the public that the government has been in consultation with the Lungu family and relevant stakeholders to coordinate funeral arrangements. The late President’s body is expected to arrive in Zambia on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.

The official funeral gathering will take place at Belvedere Lodge along Leopards Hill Road in Kabulonga, Lusaka.

“As a mark of respect, all entertainment activities should be postponed or cancelled during the mourning period, and national flags will be flown at half-mast from 06:00 hours to 18:00 daily,” said Mr. Kangwa.

President Hichilema’s declaration of national mourning is in line with guidelines for honouring former Heads of State and is meant to acknowledge Mr. Lungu’s contributions to the nation during his time in office.

Further details regarding the state funeral and burial arrangements will be communicated in due course.

US jobs report surprises to upside—forget a summer rate cut from Fed

Chief Editor
-
0
US jobs report surprises to upside—forget a summer rate cut from Fed

The latest US jobs report came in hotter than expected, all but shutting the door on hopes for interest rate cuts this summer, says Nigel Green, CEO of global financial advisory and asset management organization, deVere Group.

Stock futures surged and bond yields climbed after the US economy added 139,000 jobs in May—well above the 125,000 that had been priced in.

He comments: “The labor market’s resilience puts the Fed in a difficult spot: inflation pressures remain sticky, and the cooling many expected simply hasn’t materialized in the data that matters most.

“This report puts another nail in the coffin for any talk of rate cuts in the summer. The Fed has said time and again it needs to see weakness in the labour market to move. This isn’t weakness. It’s strength with staying power.”

The report comes at a time when investors are already digesting a new wave of uncertainty stemming from trade policy shifts. As tariffs ramp back up under the Trump administration, inflationary pressure is poised to accelerate.

While these effects may take weeks or months to show fully in the CPI or PCE figures, markets are already preparing for another round of cost-driven price increases that will muddy the waters for policymakers.

“Inflation isn’t going to go gently,” Nigel Green adds. “We’re now seeing the early signs of a rebound in core pricing due to tariffs and wage pressures, and with job creation holding firm, there’s simply no justification for the Fed to move early.”

He continues: “It’s becoming increasingly apparent that the central bank will need to wait until at least September before cutting, if not later.

“That delay carries consequences—particularly for interest-rate-sensitive assets like tech stocks, growth sectors, and riskier emerging markets that had been pricing in easier policy.”

The bond market has responded decisively. Yields on the 10-year Treasury climbed sharply following the report, as traders revised their expectations.

Meanwhile, equities have staged a short-term rally on the idea that the economy is still running strong—but underlying that is a sense of growing caution.

With real rates remaining high and inflation likely to tick higher in June’s print, risk assets are increasingly exposed to a re-rating.

“Investors need to reposition fast,” warns Nigel Green. “This is a policy pivot moment, but not the one people hoped for. The pivot isn’t toward cuts—it’s toward patience. The central bank is back on watch-and-wait mode, and that means portfolios should start reflecting more defensive allocations.”

There are deeper concerns building too. The longer interest rates stay elevated, the more vulnerable over-leveraged sectors become. Commercial real estate, consumer credit, and regional banks—already under stress—could soon find the environment more difficult than many are anticipating.

On top of this, there is no clear signal yet on how expansive the new trade regime will become. The inflationary pass-through from tariffs tends to show up in delayed waves, but the direction is unmistakable.

Global firms with cross-border supply chains will face mounting pressure, and those costs are rarely absorbed quietly.

The Fed’s next meeting will likely confirm what the jobs report has already shown: the data is not moving fast enough in the right direction.

Talk of a summer cut now looks outdated. Even September is starting to look optimistic unless there’s a marked slowdown in hiring or a major downside surprise in inflation.

“This is the moment to reassess,” Nigel Green concludes.

“Too many investors positioned for a summer easing are now badly offside. The jobs number has redrawn the map. Forward-looking strategies must reflect that reality—now, not later.”

RPP Cautions Nakachinda on Irresponsible Statements Regarding the Passing of President Edgar Lungu

Chief Editor
-
19
RPP Cautions Nakachinda on Irresponsible Statements Regarding the Passing of President Edgar Lungu

The Republican Progressive Party (RPP) would like to state that in this solemn period of national grief, it is incumbent upon all political leaders to exercise restraint, responsibility, and patriotism in what we say and do, especially in the public domain and through international media platforms.

It is in this regard that I wish to respectfully advise Mr. Raphael Nakachinda to be mindful of his utterances and the narratives he chooses to propagate in the wake of President Lungu’s natural passing. Blaming the government of a natural death. Mr. Nakachinda’s utterances is inciting unnecessary suspicion, division, and public anxiety—particularly at a time when unity and dignity should be our collective priority. This is a moment for national reflection, not for sowing discord or pushing unfounded narratives that risk polarizing the country and creating an unfavorable environment for Zambians to mourn with dignity.

This is not the time for political point-scoring or inflammatory conjecture. It is a time to honor the legacy of the late president and allow the nation and his family to mourn in peace. Statements that may create a hostile or misleading perception in the eyes of the international community do more harm than good to our national image and cohesion.

We urge Mr. Nakachinda and others to rise above partisan interests and contribute to a respectful and peaceful atmosphere. Let us preserve the decorum befitting a former Head of State, and allow Zambians to bid farewell in a manner that upholds our values and our dignity as a nation.

Leslie Chikuse
President – Republican Progressive Party (RPP)
Lusaka, Zambia

Mourning with Fire: Did Hichilema Deny Edgar Lungu a Chance to Live?

Chief Editor
-
15
Mourning with Fire: Did Hichilema Deny Edgar Lungu a Chance to Live?

By Kapya Kaoma
The chilling revelation that former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu was repeatedly denied permission to travel abroad for urgent medical care—even when he offered to pay from his own pocket—is nothing short of morally outrageous. That he had to slip out of the country like a fugitive, stripped of the dignity befitting his former office, and that those who assisted him were swiftly fired, raises a sobering question, What kind of politics are we practicing? If a former Head of State could be treated this way, what hope remains for the rest of us?

That he was once blocked from boarding a plane for treatment isn’t just disturbing—it is damning. It suggests not neglect, but something far more sinister–creeping authoritarianism masquerading as democracy. Surely! What administration withholds healthcare as a tool of political punishment? What kind of “New Dawn” dims the light on a man’s final days for political rivalry?
We must resist the ritual silence that shrouds death in polite restraint. Another coffin has come before us, but the truth must not be buried with it. Former President Lungu’s death is not just a tragedy—it bears the markings of political indifference, if not deliberate cruelty.

President Hichilema’s curt statement—that he was “informed” of Lungu’s passing—felt cold, distant, and sterile. This was not the death of a stranger; this was a former president. The moment demanded compassion. What we received was detachment.

Where was the urgency? Where was the empathy? Where, indeed, was the leadership?
Has the thirst for power so intoxicated our national conscience that even common decency must now be rationed?

We must ask the questions that matter. What became of the Office of the Former President—an institution designed not merely as a courtesy, but as a safeguard of dignity, continuity, and national memory? In any functioning democracy, the office would ensure that a former Head of State receives the care he needs, no matter the political weather. In Zambia, it seems, institutional respect has been replaced with political vindictiveness—and now, we are counting the cost in lives, not just in headlines.

The government claimed there was no money to support President Lungu’s treatment. Yet there’s always money—plenty of it—for endless foreign trips, bloated entourages, and the maintenance of two presidential residences for Mr. Hichilema. That’s not just fiscal irresponsibility—it’s moral rot. Since when did saving a life become an optional expense?

I will not mourn Edgar Lungu with tears alone. I mourn him with righteous anger—anger at the erosion of ubuntu, our shared humanity. Anger at a system so broken that those who chose compassion were punished for it. Anger that a man who once held the highest office in the land had to beg for dignity in his final moments.

President Lungu’s death must be more than a headline. It must be a turning point. It must help us to collectively declare, Never again. Never again should a sitting president hold unchecked power over the welfare of those who came before him. These are not favors handed out in benevolence—they are constitutional rights, funded by the very people in whose name the state claims to govern.

Yes, calls for unity in mourning are appropriate. But they must not be used as a blanket to smother truth. President Hichilema still has a chance to lead with moral clarity—but leadership, ethical leadership, begins with accountability.

The Lungu family has lost a husband, a father, a man. Zambia has lost a former leader, beloved by the masses. The rivers of tears flowing through our markets, streets, compounds, churches, and campuses speak loudly to President Hichilema, “The man you sidelined, mocked, and vowed to grab by the neck with his mingalato—was cherished by millions.”

But this mourning is not just about Edgar Lungu. It is a national lament—a cry for ethical leadership that places humanity above vendetta, and compassion above politics.

I believe in forgiveness. And I pray the Lungu family will, in time, find the strength to forgive. But let us be clear: forgiveness is not silence. Forgiveness begins with truth. And truth requires that we name what went wrong.
We should always remember that human life is sacred. It is not a pawn to be traded in the chess game of political rivalry. It must never again be subordinated to power, pride, or presidential pettiness.

It is time to end the politics of vengeance. It is time to say, Enough!

Lungu Family Speaks Out on Burial Plans, Blames State for Denied Medical Access

Lusaka Times Editor
-
31
Lungu Family Speaks Out on Burial Plans, Blames State for Denied Medical Access

Makebi Zulu, legal representative of the family of the late President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, has revealed that the family has formally engaged with the government to discuss the burial of the former Head of State. In a solemn statement, Zulu confirmed that the late president will be buried in Zambia in line with his personal wishes, with dignity befitting his service to the nation. However, the family has also strongly criticized the current government, alleging that it repeatedly denied Lungu access to medical treatment abroad despite being fully aware of his condition. Zulu expressed deep concern that had these requests been honoured, the former president might still be alive. While calling for national unity during this time of mourning, the family insists that no burial arrangement contrary to Lungu’s wishes and dignity will be accepted.

FULL STATEMENT:

Fellow countrymen and women, this is an address on behalf of the family of President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, the 6th Republican President of the Republic of Zambia. Between yesterday and today, we have had occasion to meet the government of the Republic of Zambia, represented by Honorable Milambo Haimba. In our meetings, they requested to hear what the position of the family was as regards to how the mortal remains of our former president will be dealt with.

In dealing with this subject matter, a position was presented to the government of the Republic of Zambia. The position being that the family wished to respect the wishes of the former president of the Republic of Zambia, and the respect that has been afforded to him, as he wished could be afforded to him, was that he be buried in Zambia. And in being buried in Zambia, he took cognizance of the fact that he served the country faithfully and diligently, putting aside personal ones and putting the country back on a trajectory of development.

Hence, the massive infrastructure development that he oversaw being undertaken in the country. And as such, he would not take away the reason or rather the obligation of every Zambian or the desire of every Zambian to mourn him with dignity. And as such, President Edgar Chagwa Lungu deserves the honors of being buried with the dignity that will be afforded to him by the Zambians.

Through all this, he was cognizant to the fact that the government, under the watch of President Hakainde Hichilema, did not treat him as it ought to have. Sometime in 2022, he requested to travel for medicals in South Africa. The state rejected that request.

That request was re-emphasized in 2023. The state responded by stating that it had no resources. In his response to the state, he stated that he would use his own resources.

The state responded in a letter dated the 7th of September, 2023, stating that his request was denied. Notwithstanding that the said travel was not for leisure or business, but for his health to be attended to. It should be known that at any given time, the state was aware of the ailment of President Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

Having served in State House, and thereafter being former president, they knew what his condition was. Despite all that knowledge that they had, they still refused to allow him to travel. Fellow countrymen and women, you will note that at the time these entitlements were being denied him.

He hadn’t returned to active politics. He was still receiving other entitlements such as a pay that is due to a former head of state. But as regards his health and his movement, those were heavily restricted by the state.

In 2025, when the ailment worsened and doctors travelled into Zambia, checked on him and advised that he should come to South Africa. That time, he had ceased, or government had withdrawn all his privileges, and he travelled as an ordinary citizen. And the only booked and last-minute ticket was at the airport, for purposes of not allowing the state to have enough time to connive and stop him.

He arrived at the airport 30 minutes before boarding, and eventually boarded. Those who dared to give him courtesies at the airport have since been fired. In our meeting with the state today, we made it open and clear that the family is not adverse to certain privileges, though having been taken away from him, to be accorded to him as he earns them.

Fellow countrymen and women, you will note that upon his travel, doctors in South Africa did express a concern to states to say that had he travelled earlier, they could have made certain interventions that would have sent him away. And this would not be the discussion today. However, they proceeded to take measures that were necessary to sustain him and to remedy all the desires of President Edgar Chagwa Lungu himself and the family.

As the family moves, they call for unity, they call for sobriety, they call for introspection that this should not be a cause for division, but should be a cause for unity. And as such, any position from the government that goes against the desires of the family will not be accepted. However, we remain amenable to a win-win situation that accommodates all the views of the stakeholders involved.

I thank you.

Why has the UPND Become Tone Deaf?

Chief Editor
-
5
Why has the UPND Become Tone Deaf?

By Chanda Chisala

I must confess that I was very optimistic when President Hichilema and his UPND won the 2021 elections because the insanity of party cadres becoming lawless with impunity became extremely annoying . All the good achievements of President Lungu were overshadowed by the Patriotic Front’s failure to get such thuggery under control. The PF leadership just ignored the loud complaints about this disturbing anarchy, and they paid the price for it. Of course, once they lost the elections, they suddenly saw the light and came back to Jesus!

The UPND government has now inherited that same tone deafness from their predecessors, albeit in a different direction. Their stubbornness to push through a constitutional amendment process without regard to any reasonable dissent (from the Law Association of Zambia, civic society, churches, traditional chiefs etc) is extremely disappointing. When they are advised that it’s unwise to conduct this process at this late hour as a contentious electoral season dawns, their army of social media supporters simply repeat the same talking points: “what don’t you like about this Bill? Why don’t you just propose your changes?”

This is a classic definition of political tone deafness. You can’t hear what the heart of the major complaint is: it’s the fact that we have a history of politicians tinkering with the constitution with nefarious motives of unethically helping themselves in elections, which is why we prefer it not done just before general elections. Even if we can’t show you what is wrong with the amendments, the fact is that we do not trust you to do this process without electoral or other selfish political motives. It’s nothing personal; we would not trust UNIP, MMD or PF either because they are all politicians and politicians all over the world have the incurable habit of using anything to entrench their power, especially when they have not fulfilled their major promises.

What is worse is that we can even already see worrying evidence of this political intrigue. You claim that one of the main reasons you are rushing through this Amendment Bill is because you desperately want to bring many more women and youth into government. However, as many people have pointed out, why didn’t you already elevate a large number of them when you had the discretion to do this, both through your party’s parliamentary adoptions, through nominated MPs or even through cabinet appointments etc? It is obvious to any thinking person that your claim of a newfound radical feminism is not genuine. So the question is: what else is not genuine in your other proposals? What else has an insidious motive and political calculation that we may not be seeing?

Or maybe there is absolutely no wrong motive and you really are the first set of politicians in Zambia who are completely honest and selfless. That may be true, but the people have no way of knowing this. So, if you had any serious concern for establishing an amendment process that is untainted with political suspicions, you would halt the process and resume after you win the next elections. If you are afraid that you might lose and these changes might not be done by the next government, because they do not love the women and youth as much as you do, rushing it now still makes no difference because they can just reverse whatever you push through. They will simply claim that they have the mandate of the voters now, which means this cycle of abusing the trust of the people will continue. Could you at least keep just one promise by putting an end to this destructive cycle once and for all?

Recent Articles from the Author:

Why the Thefts Can’t be Stopped

he US is Wrong to Withdraw Aid

Are UPND and Opposition Both Trying to Lose Elections?

Who Was the Worst President of Zambia?

How to End Zambia’s Poverty

Hichilema Should Have Implemented Sata’s Idea

President Hichilema is a Good Man, But His Policies Can’t Fix the Economy

Should Zambia Really Return to Socialism?

The author, Chanda Chisala, is the Founder of Zambia Online and Khama Institute. He is formerly a John S. Knight Fellow at Stanford University and Visiting Scholar to the Hoover Institution, a policy think tank at Stanford. You can follow him on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/chandachisala.

Hichilema’s Words That Wound, Lungu’s Death That Silences

Chief Editor
-
34
Hichilema’s Words That Wound, Lungu’s Death That Silences

By Kapya Kaoma

The passing of former President Edgar Lungu marks not only a national tragedy but also a solemn moment for reflection in Zambian politics. It offers those in leadership—especially President Hakainde Hichilema—an opportunity to reconsider the tone and tenor of political engagement that has defined the country’s recent past. It is a moment to acknowledge that political rivalry, when driven by personal antagonism and amplified by state institutions, can corrode the foundations of democratic civility.

Since taking office, President Hichilema cast Mr. Lungu as his central adversary. Public discourse was saturated with sharp criticism, dismissive remarks, and pointed rhetoric aimed at delegitimizing the former president’s political ambitions and personal dignity. Lungu was portrayed as a national pariah, repeatedly told he would never return to State House as long as Hichilema was in power. References to possible imprisonment, mockery of his political comeback as ‘kutumpa,” and threats of “imingalato” to block his path back to the presidency were just a few examples of Hichilema’s combative—and at times demeaning—approach.

This hostility was neither subtle nor incidental. It was sustained, public, and unmistakable.

In the wake of Lungu’s death, it would be disingenuous to ignore this history. The national discourse must reckon with the impact such rhetoric has had—not only on Lungu’s legacy but on our national politics.

It also forces us to confront an uncomfortable, perhaps inevitable, public truth; President Hichilema’s most formidable challenger is now gone—not through the ballot, but through death. The constitutional questions surrounding Lungu’s eligibility, once central to Zambia’s political debates, have now been silenced. As a result, when the President expresses sorrow over Lungu’s death, many may quietly wonder–what exactly is he mourning?

This is a sobering reminder of the power of language. Words are never neutral. They frame public perception, shape emotional responses, and leave residues that outlast any single administration. Had it been known that Lungu would not live to contest the 2026 elections, would the President’s rhetoric have been different? Would we have seen more restraint, greater civility, deeper respect?

Though President Hichilema may now offer heartfelt condolences, their reception remains uncertain. Many Zambians—and perhaps Lungu’s own family—will remember the antagonism that defined their relationship. It is hard to reconcile today’s condolences with yesterday’s condemnations.

Lungu’s passing also suggests untold erosion of empathy in political life. Politicians, above all else, are human beings. They suffer illness, loss, and, ultimately, death. They are not mere vessels of power or policy, but individuals deserving of dignity and humane treatment—even in opposition.

This is a moment that demands a renewed commitment to ubuntu—the African ethical principle affirming our shared humanity. Without it, political life descends into suspicion, antagonism, and moral decay. We begin to whisper accusations, nurture distrust, and lose sight of our mutual obligations as citizens.

President Hichilema must now confront a perception—fair or not—that his political opponents have fallen while his own position has grown stronger. He is, of course, not responsible for events beyond his control, and there is no evidence suggesting any culpability. Still, in African tradition, perception outweighs fact.

For some, this reality will stir uncomfortable comparisons with other contexts where political rivals vanished or died under questionable circumstances. While such parallels should not be made lightly, they reflect a broader regional unease that cannot be ignored. In recent memory, Edith Nawakwi died under similar conditions. Today, Zambia mourns Edgar Lungu. The unsettling question that now lingers is, who might be next?

One cannot help but feel sympathy for President Hichilema. History has cast him in a difficult role—one in which his own ascent coincides with the disappearance of his rivals. Whether by design or by fate, their shadows will trail him into the future. Sadly the nation, in quiet reflection, will continue to watch, remember, and whisper to the wind.

May his soul rest in peace and rise in glory. Amen.

Corruption Scandals Challenge UPND’s Newly Adopted “Kwenyu” Slogan

Chief Editor
-
5
Corruption Scandals Challenge UPND’s Newly Adopted “Kwenyu” Slogan

By Venus N Msyani

As Zambia approaches the 2026 general elections, political slogans are shaping the campaign season’s narrative. The ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) has adopted “Kwenyu,” a Tonga phrase meaning “done” or “correct,” as its rallying cry. This slogan, similar to checking off completed tasks on a list, is intended to reinforce the party’s achievements. However, mounting corruption scandals threaten to undermine its credibility.

Meanwhile, the opposition has been embracing the Bemba phrase “Alebwelelapo pamupando” (He is returning to the seat), referring to, may his soul rest in peace, former President Edgar Lungu’s bid for reelection.

This phrase has been gaining traction among opposition supporters, creating a direct challenge to the UPND administration. President Hakainde Hichilema, responding to this slogan, has been struggling with linguistic precision, often slipping when speaking in Bemba and Tonga. In Zambia, certain words are culturally sensitive, and his missteps have been occasionally fueling controversy.

Initially, some believed “Kwenyu” was another linguistic slip when they first heard the President say it. However, it soon became evident that UPND had deliberately adopted it as a campaign slogan. Today, in speeches and remarks, UPND officials are met with chants of “Kwenyu,” reinforcing its position as the party’s brand heading into 2026.

Yet, the rise in corruption scandals within UPND circles complicates the party’s ability to champion integrity. A striking example is the case of Local Government Permanent Secretary Nicholas Phiri. In November 2024, Phiri publicly committed to resign if all 156 constituencies did not receive ambulances by May 2025. It was a bold pledge, reflecting the administration’s promises of improved healthcare delivery. However, now in June 2025, many constituencies remain without ambulances, and calls for Phiri’s resignation are growing louder.

Despite these demands, Phiri refuses to step down, citing unforeseen logistical challenges that have delayed procurement via the Zambia Medicines and Medical Supplies Agency (ZAMMSA). His refusal raises concerns, particularly because ZAMMSA has previously been implicated in corruption allegations under the UPND administration. The question arises—are these ambulance acquisitions free from irregularities, or does this procurement process warrant deeper scrutiny?

Instead of merely demanding Phiri’s resignation, there may be value in probing further into the procurement process. Given his experience in government operations, it is reasonable to assume that he would have anticipated potential obstacles before making such a public pledge. The failure to meet his commitment suggests either mismanagement or deeper issues within the government’s healthcare procurement strategy. Addressing these concerns transparently is vital to restoring public trust.

The UPND administration’s fight against corruption is failing because it often ignores the deeper structural issues at play. The persistence of scandals suggests that rather than prioritizing genuine reform, the anti-corruption narrative is being wielded as a political tool to gain mileage. This situation is compounded by the lack of mandatory annual asset declarations from elected officials, a vital accountability measure that could have prevented many financial irregularities. If the President had led by example in asset declaration, the political conversation surrounding corruption would likely be different.

Given the current wave of scandals, UPND may find it increasingly difficult to address corruption convincingly in its 2026 campaign speeches. The challenge lies in whether the administration can implement real reforms rather than relying on slogans to deflect criticism.

Transparency and accountability remain key factors in shaping public opinion. The Zambian people will be watching closely, demanding actions that align with political rhetoric. Ultimately, “Kwenyu” may prove to be more than just a slogan. It could become a test of whether the UPND has indeed fulfilled its promises or merely spoken them into existence.

1...567...5,641Page 6 of 5,641

Company

Trending

Categories

© Lusaka Times