By Kapya Kaoma

President Hakainde Hichilema’s recent call for “all Zambians to be productive in order to promote trade and economic growth,” as reported by the Lusaka Times, might seem noble on paper—but in reality, it’s dripping with irony. That he delivered these words at the Anglican Cathedral of the Holy Cross during a Thanksgiving Service for good rains only deepens the disconnect between presidential rhetoric and the daily struggles of ordinary Zambians.

To me, what was meant as inspiration landed more like a punchline. I recall a conversation with a UPND-supporting taxi driver in Lusaka who proudly said, “President Hichilema has taught Zambians to work hard.” He’s not alone—this line has become the slogan of UPND commanders–cadres that once marched in protest over the high cost of living under the Lungu administration. Today, those same voices dismiss hardship with a shrug and a sermon about hard work. So I have to ask myself, when exactly did Zambians stop working?

Honestly, they never did. Zambians have always toiled—hustling in markets, queuing in clinics, stretching every Kwacha just to make ends meet. What has changed, however, is not their productivity, but the betrayal of their labor by politicians. Successive governments, including the UPND administration, have commodified people’s struggle, exploiting their resilience while giving back little in return. Under the Patriotic Front, desperate mothers lined the streets. Under HH, the faces are the same, the lines even longer. Only the slogans have shifted.

I don’t want to misrepresent anything. At the core of Zambia’s economic plight isn’t the drought, nor is it a lack of productivity. It’s theft—rampant, unashamed, and increasingly normalized under this President. While pastors gathered in prayer, did anyone dare ask what, exactly, President Hichilema was giving thanks for? Wasting public resources by living lavishly in two State Houses? The “disappearance” of $20 million meant for maize? Siphoning of $50 million intended for essential drugs? Or perhaps the staggering $3 billion in missing public funds spotlighted by the U.S. ambassador?

These aren’t divine disasters. They are outcomes of political choices made by people in HH’s offices. It is on us to accept that poverty isn’t accidental—it is engineered. Our politicians are not victims of circumstance; they are its architects. And it is time we said so, plainly.

It is shameful that ruling party loyalists scrambled to dismiss the U.S. ambassador’s allegations. In diplomacy, silence carries weight. Had the accusations been false, President Hichilema would have responded swiftly and decisively—a formal protest, a diplomatic recall, a press conference. Instead, there was nothing—just silence. And silence, in this case, speaks volumes.

As a Christian, I cherish the Church. But I refuse to accept prayer as a stand-in for justice. The Zambian Church, with a few courageous exceptions, has become more interested in proximity to power than in prophetic witness. It kneels for influence but stands back from truth. Why hasn’t the Church demanded answers about missing medicines, about maize that vanished while people went hungry? How many envelopes handed to clergy are soaked in the blood of the poor—money that could have saved lives at UTH or stocked empty pharmacies in hospitals and clinics across the nation?

Karl Marx’s warning that religion can become the opium of the people is uncomfortably true here. In Zambia, religion has been used as political absolution. The same Church that once gathered under “Pastors for Lungu” now quietly blesses a new administration—not with scrutiny, but with submission. It is not an overstatement to say corruption and the pulpit are allies in our so-called Christian nation.

I am still puzzled by silence around the maize scandal. Could the answer be in brown envelopes? Until the Church finds its courage, it will remain complicit, laundering corruption through prayers and piety. It must not endorse the gospel according to HH either–work harder, and starve better!

President Hichilema owes Zambians more than economic mantras or prayers. He owes them the truth, the whole truth. What happened to the maize? The medicine? The billions?

These questions can’t be answered by bishops, priests, pastors, apostles, prophets, evangelists or prayers.

Only the President can answer them.

And he must.

Zambia’s Post-Election Unity Pledge Falters as Rift Between Hichilema and Lungu Deepens

Three years after Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema extended a public olive branch to his predecessor Edgar Lungu, promising to “look after” him in a gesture of post-election unity, the relationship between the two leaders has deteriorated into open hostility, exposing deep political fractures in Africa’s second-largest copper producer.

The collapse of civility, confirmed this week by Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly Getrude Imenda, a senior member of Hichilema’s ruling United Party for National Development (UPND), underscores the challenges of sustaining democratic reconciliation in a nation still grappling with economic stagnation and polarized politics.

From Unity to Discord
Imenda, in an exclusive interview, recounted Hichilema’s conciliatory tone during his first post-victory press conference in August 2021, when he directly addressed Lungu: “We will look after you, sir.” The remark, she said, was intended to signal a departure from Zambia’s history of post-election retribution. “It was a moment of respect,” Imenda stated. “We hoped it would inspire a new political culture.”

But within months, tensions flared. Sources close to both camps confirm that Lungu interpreted the pledge as disingenuous, particularly after Hichilema’s administration launched anti-corruption investigations targeting Lungu-era officials. Lungu, who conceded defeat after a disputed 2021 election, has since accused the UPND of conducting a “political witch hunt,” a charge the government denies.

Lungu’s public withdrawal from state functions, including the annual Independence Day celebrations marked a turning point. “He felt sidelined and disrespected,” a former aide to Lungu, speaking anonymously, told Lusaka times. “The relationship became irreparable.”

Political Fallout and Public Divisions
The rift has reverberated through Zambia’s institutions. Parliament sessions have grown increasingly combative, with lawmakers from Lungu’s Patriotic Front (PF) boycotting debates and UPND members accusing the opposition of obstructing reforms. Civil society groups report a surge in tribal rhetoric, particularly online, with supporters of both leaders trading accusations of authoritarianism and incompetence.

Economic pressures have compounded frustrations. Despite Hichilema’s pledges to restore fiscal stability, Zambia’s currency, the kwacha, remains volatile, and inflation hovers near 13%. Public sector workers, including teachers and nurses, have staged protests over delayed salaries a vulnerability the PF has seized upon to criticize the UPND’s governance.

Analysts: A Missed Opportunity
Political historians argue the breakdown reflects systemic flaws. “The initial goodwill was a chance to model transitional cooperation in Africa,” said Dr. Chanda Mwape of the University of Zambia. “Instead, we’ve reverted to a winner-takes-all mentality that undermines institution-building.”

Data from the Lusaka-based Centre for Policy Dialogue reveals that over 30 PF officials, including former ministers, have been arrested since 2021 on charges ranging from corruption to abuse of authority. While the UPND insists these are lawful accountability measures, PF spokesperson Emmanuel Mwamba calls them “targeted persecution.”

Citizens Caught in the Crossfire
For ordinary Zambians, the feud has tangible consequences. At Lusaka’s sprawling Soweto Market, trader Grace Mulenga lamented, “Our leaders are fighting over power while we fight for basics.” In Eastern Province, a Lungu stronghold, farmer Boyd Zulu echoed resentment: “They’ve forgotten the voters who brought them to power.”

2026 Looms Large
With general elections two years away, tensions are escalating. Lungu, who initially vowed to retire from politics, has recently hinted at a comeback, telling supporters in May that Zambia “needs rescue from failed promises.” The UPND, meanwhile, faces growing scrutiny over unmet campaign pledges, including job creation and debt restructuring.

Imenda, while critical of Lungu’s withdrawal, urged a return to dialogue: “Zambia’s stability depends on leaders prioritizing the nation over personal grievances.” Her appeal comes as regional bodies, including the African Union, monitor Zambia’s democratic health amid fears of backsliding.

A Test for Democracy
Zambia’s 2021 election was celebrated as a rare example of an African opposition victory achieved through the ballot box. But the unraveling of Hichilema and Lungu’s relationship now poses a critical question: Can a nation once hailed as a beacon of peace sustain its democratic gains amid entrenched polarization?

As both sides dig in, the answer much like the broken promise of that August day remains unresolved.

Chief Madzimawe Urges Politicians to Prioritize Development Over Politics

Chief Madzimawe has issued a clarion call to political leaders across Zambia to shift their focus from rhetoric to results. Speaking candidly about the state of development in various communities, the traditional leader expressed concern over persistent infrastructural challenges, particularly potholes, that remain unresolved even after new governments assume power.

“If you are a political leader and you find that there is a pothole there, when you get into government that pothole should not remain a pothole,” he said. His remarks are a clear indictment of the political culture that often emphasizes blame over solutions.

Chief Madzimawe stressed the need for genuine interventions that uplift communities, urging leaders to not just critique but provide meaningful alternatives. He reiterated that true leadership is about creating lasting impact rather than scoring political points. His comments reflect a growing public sentiment that demands accountability and visible progress from elected officials.

Traditional leaders like Chief Madzimawe play an influential role in governance, often acting as a bridge between rural communities and the state. His statements come at a time when citizens are increasingly vocal about their dissatisfaction with the pace of development.

Analysts suggest that his message is particularly relevant as the country approaches another electoral cycle. Many Zambians have expressed fatigue over repeated campaign promises that fail to translate into real improvements in healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

Development economist Jane Banda notes that Chief Madzimawe’s remarks should not be taken lightly. “He is voicing what many ordinary Zambians feel. There is a pressing need for a development-focused governance model that transcends political affiliations.”

The chief’s emphasis on proposing alternatives rather than merely opposing government actions could serve as a guiding principle for the political class. Constructive criticism, when paired with actionable solutions, can foster a more collaborative political environment.

His message also aligns with broader regional calls for inclusive development strategies. Across Africa, traditional leaders are increasingly speaking out on issues ranging from environmental conservation to public health. Their grassroots connection gives them a unique perspective on what works and what doesn’t.

Chief Madzimawe’s plea for politicians to focus on real issues rather than political theatrics resonates strongly with a population yearning for change. His words serve as both a challenge and a roadmap for leaders who claim to represent the people. As Zambia continues its journey toward economic and social development, voices like Chief Madzimawe’s are more crucial than ever.

His statement may very well mark a turning point in how political leaders engage with the electorate shifting from empty rhetoric to meaningful, community-driven progress. Whether the nation’s political actors heed this call remains to be seen, but the message is clear: development must take center stage.