Saturday, June 14, 2025
Subscribe
Home Blog Page 2

Give President Hichilema a break; PF is aggressive, cantankerous……unrepentant!

Chief Editor
-
16
Give President Hichilema a break; PF is aggressive, cantankerous……unrepentant!

A number of people have come out with guns blazing wondering why President Hichilema continues to remain tight-lipped amidst demise of 6th Republican president Edgar Lungu.

The first one to throw a salvo was of course United Kwacha Alliance (UKA) Chairman, Sakwiba Sikota! During his visit to the Patriotic Front (PF) Secretariat, Sikota issued the following statement, “I have not heard President Hichilema physically address the nation regarding the death of Edgar Lungu. Tell me if I missed it, to me, it’s something that is frightening to remain silent. You are the head of state and your predecessor passes away, and you remain silent.”

In no time, Mwila-Chigaga, the widow of the late former finance minister in the United National Independence Party (UNIP) government Gibson Chigaga, asserted that Hichilema’s silence is troubling. She claimed that the failure and inaction by President Hichilema to provide leadership on the state of affairs regarding the death of former president Lungu is hurting the nation.

Are people being truthful and honest with the comments they are making regarding President Hichilema’s silence…..or they are simply politicking, if not merely trying to scandalize him? Moreover, what does the Bible teach us about silence?

Given what we have witnessed in the PF camp in recent days, we’ve no doubt the former ruling party remains aggressive, cantankerous and unrepentant! How do you therefore expect anyone to reason with such kind of people? Consider the way PF cadres took up the entire lane on the Kafue – Lusaka as they raced to the funeral at breakneck speed while perched on the sides of the doors of their convoy? We’ve no doubt they were more than happy to go back to their vomit….’kaponya style’ of conducting themselves in an uncivilized manner!

Those of us that are better grounded in our culture would have little trouble appreciating that when sorrow of such magnitude has visited our village, everyone is expected to be at their best, sworn enemies may burry their hatchets while the likes of ‘Why Me’ would put their dictionaries of ear-splitting profanities aside for a while as everyone combine efforts to give their dear departed one a dignified send-off…..

But lo and behold, what have we seen or heard since ba Lungu passed away? Accusations, ultimatums, threats and dire warnings all aimed at one individual – President Hichilema! How do you honestly expect him to say or issue any comment regarding the funeral? There’s a huge possibility he wasn’t even officially informed about the funeral by the family or indeed the PF leadership. Let’s be fair for once!

The confusion and drama that has characterized ba Lungu’s funeral is totally uncalled for! How come the party has taken ovet the show? Didn’t the former president have senior members in his family?

When Levy Mwanawasa passed on for instance, senior elders in his family, Jazzman Chikwakwa and Leslie Mbula immediately took charge – giving daily updates and coordinating with government. Similarly, Frederick Chiluba’s uncle, Ben Mwila was on hand to provide guidance when he suddenly died. Emmanuel Mwamba is said to have been the last person with him when this happened; we hope he shall write a book one day to give an account of what really transpired on that day.

Considering the confusion characterized with PF, one would have expected pandemonium to have reigned supreme when its founding leader, Micheal Sata answered the Lord’s call. Fortunately, all the responsibilities of making funeral arrangements rested on the shoulders of his uncle, Alexander Chikwanda, working on cahoots with the state of course.

The same thing happened when our founding father, Kenneth Kaunda’s time finally came. His eldest son, Panji seamlessly worked with government to find common ground even when there was a deadlock as to where to hide his remains….well, according to his last will and testament.

And when our good Lord finally took Rupiah Banda away, we didn’t witness any acrimony or standoff between his family and party on one hand, and government on the other, as we are seeing today despite the PF having denied him permission to travel to South Africa for treatment when Lungu served as Minister of Home Affairs. The occupation of cadres was restricted to chewing and quaffing while his young brother James Banda sorted out things with government unlike what we are seeing with the ressurrected PF ‘commanders’ today.

Why has ba Lungu’s family allowed PF and its surrogates to politicize this funeral? Ever since he died on June 5, it has been one inflammatory and virulent remark after another – Lungu was poisoned! HH not welcome at Lungu’s funeral as he’ll pierce our hearts….The fight has just started! 3 times you denied Lungu life….Hichilema must stay away from the funeral!

Honestly, how do you expect the President to say anything given such circumstances?
As a wise person, the President has done well to remain mute lest he may be misquoted. If we had a way, we’d advise the President to stay away from the funeral and instead delegate his vice-president to do the honours. Why should the President be exposed to an environment where he is definitely going to be disrespected and insulted as the PF has already demonstrated.

Meanwhile we remain observing the proceedings from the terraces with keen interest.

Prince Bill M Kaping’a
National Coordinator
HH Mpaka 2031
People’s Alliances

Who’s Really in Charge of Zambia?: What Lungu’s Funeral Reveal About Hichilema’s Leadership

Chief Editor
-
6
Who’s Really in Charge of Zambia?: What Lungu’s Funeral Reveal About Hichilema’s Leadership

By Kapya Kaoma

Who’s Really in Charge of Zambia? It’s a simple question—but in this moment of national grief, the answer feels anything but simple.

The passing of former President Edgar Lungu has rocked the foundations of Zambian politics. Beyond revitalizing the Patriotic Front (PF), it has exposed something far more troubling–the staggering fragility of President Hakainde Hichilema’s leadership. For all the talk of a “New Dawn,” what we are witnessing is a presidency adrift—disconnected from the pulse of the people, paralyzed in the face of crisis, and steeped in a self-assurance that no longer carries power.

For nearly four years, President Hichilema has governed with an executive arrogance that insulated him from political reality. Didn’t he know it all? Surrounded by loyalists, he convinced himself that he alone set the national mood—that the Bally of 2021 still commanded affection and authority. But the nation’s reaction to President Lungu’s death shattered that illusion.

He expected a river of PF tears—what he got was an ocean of national grief. The spontaneous gatherings, the overwhelming nostalgia, the heartfelt mourning—these weren’t partisan theatrics. They were real. Indeed, Hichilema was utterly unprepared for them.

More troubling still is the leadership vacuum this death has revealed. Instead of stepping in with a unifying presence, the President and his allies have turned to clergy and civil society to do what he should have done himself–bring political rivals to the table to mourn Lungu. That task should never have fallen on the bishops. Bridge-building is not the clergy’s calling—it is the sacred duty of a President who truly leads.

Yet here we are. The President, consumed by pride, is sidelined by his own refusal to listen. He clings to sycophants while ignoring the public mood, isolating himself from the very people he claims to serve. There is no vision. No plan. No emotional resonance with a grieving nation.

True leadership means more than dismissing critics. It means reading the room, sensing the soul of the country, and adjusting course when the winds change. Had Hichilema paid attention to the mounting admiration for Lungu, he might have used this moment for reconciliation, for healing, for unity. Instead, he chose denial—believing the chants were staged, the crowds manufactured, and his own popularity invincible. It was a costly delusion.

Today, his government is scrambling. Ministers once brimming with confidence are now pleading for unity. Belvedere Lodge, declared as the official mourning place is empty–a ghostly testament to a presidency that has lost its way. “Come mourn your beloved President… the one you loved so much,” they now plead—words of desperation, not authority. Yet nobody heeds those words to save UPND cadres–making fools of themselves.

This is more than a political crisis; it’s a national reckoning. If Zambia is to face the coming campaign season with dignity and peace, it must begin with leadership rooted not in narcissistic ego, but in empathy.

That said, I am an optimist. I believe this crisis could yet be a turning point. If President Hichilema can summon the humility to admit mistakes, to re-engage with all Zambians—not just his loyal base—he can begin the long walk back to trust. But it starts with reflection and understanding that no President governs alone. Zambia is not the private property of Community House. It belongs to the people—and the opposition is part of those people.

Mr. President, look in the mirror. Don’t just listen to your cadres. Don’t rule with pride—lead with humility. Become the President for all Zambians. Because in the end, leadership is not about being obeyed—it’s about being trusted, loved, and believed.

Right now, you’ve lost all three. It’s up to you to win them back.

In the Silence of a President: The Pain We Refuse to See

Lusaka Times Editor
-
14
In the Silence of a President: The Pain We Refuse to See

In the Silence of a President: The Pain We Refuse to See

By Mambo Tembo

In moments of national grief, we often seek voices strong, comforting, or even apologetic. But when those voices go silent, we are quick to fill the void with anger, suspicion, or judgment. Yet silence is not always indifference. Sometimes, silence is the heaviest burden a man can carry and perhaps today, that burden rests squarely on the shoulders of President Hakainde Hichilema.

Zambia is mourning not only the death of its Sixth Republican President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu, but also the symbolic death of a reconciliation that never came to pass. The President’s silence in this moment is not a declaration of coldness or hatred. It is, perhaps, a reflection of the complexity of emotions political, personal, and deeply human.

We must remember, President Hichilema did not just lose a political rival. He lost a man with whom history entwined his own. Their story full of rivalry, tension, and political stratagem was, at its core, a tale of two leaders bound by destiny and divided by ideology. And now, one is gone, and the other remains  haunted not just by what was done, but by what was never said.

Can you imagine the ache of that silence? The weight of unsaid words, unextended hands, unhealed wounds? We often forget that presidents are also people, and people feel. Behind closed doors, in the quiet corners of the State House, there may be tears that will never reach the public eye. There may be private prayers for a man whose public relationship was fraught, but whose departure has left a profound emptiness.

Many Zambians, understandably, are pained by what they see as delayed compassion. But have we considered that the President’s silence may be his deepest expression of sorrow? That perhaps he is mourning in the way men sometimes do quietly, painfully, and privately? Politics demanded they never show weakness. Now, death demands they show humanity.

It is easy to forget that beyond his role as Head of State, HH is a man, flawed, emotional, perhaps even regretful. It’s possible that deep inside, he carries the weight of missed chances: a handshake never offered, an apology never made, a final moment of mutual respect denied by the unrelenting grip of political gamesmanship. Perhaps the thought that he might have reconciled with ECL  not for cameras or campaigns, but for peace of heart, now stings more than any criticism ever could.

There are nights, perhaps, when he sits in the dark with the flicker of memory hearing old speeches, remembering fierce debates, or recalling the way the crowd would roar at ECL’s mention. What a paradox it must be: to have politically battled a man with all the might of the State, only to now quietly wish for one more moment to say something… anything… human.

This is not a call to excuse the past. There are valid grievances about how Edgar Lungu was treated. But it is a plea to recognize the human tragedy that overshadows the political one. HH is not gloating. He is grieving. And grief, unlike policy, cannot be timed or scripted.

Tyler Perry’s Straw reminds us how people can find themselves trapped in consequences they never intended. Perhaps HH now stands at that very crossroad , where politics ends and conscience begins. A man reflecting not on power, but on humanity. And perhaps, when time softens the sting, he will speak, maybe even apologise not as a President, but as a person.

Until then, Zambia must rise above its divisions. To mourn Edgar Lungu is to honour not just his legacy but the dignity of reconciliation we failed to achieve. And to understand HH’s silence is to acknowledge that sometimes, the deepest pain is the one that cannot be spoken.

So let us hold back from weaponising our sorrow. Let us not use death to score points in the game of survival. Let us reach for our shared Zambian soul  one built on ubuntu, one drenched in compassion, one that knows the meaning of crying together even when we disagree. One Embodied in ONE ZAMBIA, ONE NATION.

Let us grieve as one nation. Let us forgive. And let us hope that from this sorrow, a more compassionate Zambia will rise , one where silence is not feared, but understood.

M’membe Accuses Hichilema Government of Hypocrisy and Arrogance

Lusaka Times Editor
-
11
M’membe Accuses Hichilema Government of Hypocrisy and Arrogance

M’membe Accuses Hichilema Government of Hypocrisy and Arrogance

Lusaka, Zambia – June 10, 2025 — In a strongly worded statement, Socialist Party President Fred M’membe has launched a blistering critique of President Hakainde Hichilema and his United Party for National Development (UPND), accusing the administration of deep-seated hypocrisy, political manipulation, and moral detachment from the Zambian people.

In a post titled “ZAMBIA TWASEBANA!” — meaning “Zambia, we have embarrassed ourselves!” — M’membe expressed grave concern over what he termed “a dangerous political culture” rooted in arrogance and denial. According to him, the current leadership portrays itself as intellectually superior, leaving no room for dissent, humility, or introspection.

“With Mr Hichilema and his league, everybody else is expected to remain silent, blind, and domesticated like animals,” M’membe stated, denouncing what he believes is a deliberate silencing of alternative voices.

He accused the UPND of engaging in “manipulation, deflection and denial,” suggesting that the ruling party often shifts blame to victims instead of taking accountability. “Even when publicly called out,” he added, “they offer no explanations, empathy, or apologies  only more deflection.”

The opposition leader’s remarks come amid rising public frustration over perceived insensitivity and governance shortcomings. While the government has not responded directly to M’membe’s latest remarks, UPND officials in recent days have dismissed similar criticisms as politically motivated and unsubstantiated.

However, M’membe insists this is more than political rivalry, it’s a moral crisis.

“It is deeply unfortunate that a country as hopeful and promising as Zambia is being led by people who seem so detached from the basic tenets of humanity, justice, and truth,” he lamented.

Calling for what he termed a “return to conscience leadership,” M’membe urged citizens to demand a leadership style that prioritizes compassion, humility, and moral integrity.

This is not the first time the Socialist Party has publicly condemned the UPND. M’membe has long positioned himself as a vocal critic of what he sees as the neoliberal elitism of the current administration. But this latest message , invoking God, conscience, and national shame is among his most emotionally charged yet.

As Zambia continues to navigate economic hardship, rising inequality, and political polarization, such statements reflect a broader debate over the country’s direction and the credibility of those in power.

“May God help Zambia,” M’membe concluded, placing the burden not just on leaders but on a society grappling with what kind of nation it wants to become.

Government Refutes Allegations, Urges Dignified Mourning for Former President Lungu

Chief Editor
-
27
Government Refutes Allegations, Urges Dignified Mourning for Former President Lungu

The Minister of Information and Media and Chief Government Spokesperson, Hon. Cornelius Mweetwa, MP, held a press briefing addressing what he described as misinformation and politicization surrounding the death of Zambia’s former President, Edgar Chagwa Lungu.

Speaking at the briefing, Hon. Mweetwa confirmed that the government is actively engaging with the family of the late President to ensure that all funeral arrangements and protocols align with the family’s wishes. He stressed the importance of granting the late leader a “befitting and dignified send-off.”

However, the Minister expressed deep regret that some members of the Patriotic Front (PF), the former ruling party, are using the funeral period to engage in what he called a “political fiesta,” turning national mourning into a platform for squabbles and political point-scoring.

“It is unfortunate that the PF leadership is attempting to use the passing of President Lungu as a political springboard to gain relevance,” Mweetwa said, calling on all national leaders to exercise restraint and leadership in keeping with Zambia’s values as a Christian nation.

On Allegations Surrounding Medical Evacuation

Responding to claims that former President Lungu’s death could have been avoided had he not faced delays in medical evacuation, Mweetwa clarified that there was never any travel ban imposed by the government.

He further criticized the PF for what he described as double standards: “When our Ministry disclosed that the former President was undergoing chemotherapy, there were immediate threats of legal action, and yet now they admit he was seriously ill. This is deeply contradictory.”

On Withdrawal of Presidential Entitlements

Addressing another contentious issue, the Minister firmly denied that the government withdrew any entitlements that were legally due to the former President. He emphasized that Lungu enjoyed full benefits following his written declaration of retirement from active politics.

“According to Chapter 15, Section 5 of the Laws of Zambia, a former president who returns to active politics forfeits those benefits. President Lungu himself triggered this provision by resuming political activities,” Mweetwa explained.

He also noted that Lungu is the only former President in Zambia’s history whose immunity was not lifted after leaving office—a point he said underscores President Hichilema’s commitment to democratic norms.

On Rumors of Poisoning and Repatriation
The Minister categorically dismissed allegations that the late President may have been poisoned or that Zambian agents stormed a South African medical facility to retrieve his remains.

“If any such incident occurred, the Government of the Republic of Zambia is not aware and certainly did not authorize it,” he said. He condemned the allegations as “highly misplaced and a misrepresentation of the Zambian way of handling national grievances.”

Appeal for Calm and Responsible Reporting

Hon. Mweetwa concluded by urging both the local and international media to treat statements from certain PF leaders with caution, noting that not all are rooted in fact.

“As a country, we cannot allow inflammatory statements to promote anarchy. We call upon all Zambians to remain calm and unified during this difficult period, and to give our late former President the respect and honour he deserves,” he said.

President Lungu’s death has marked a solemn period for the country. A seven-day national mourning period has been declared from June 8 to June 14, 2025.

Where Is the Church in the Edgar Lungu Funeral Impasse?

Chief Editor
-
19
Where Is the Church in the Edgar Lungu Funeral Impasse?

By Gregory Mofu

Zambia is mourning the passing of its 6th Republican President, Dr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu. But instead of a united front in grief and dignity, the country is witnessing a deepening impasse between the Government and the Patriotic Front (PF) over funeral proceedings. What should be a solemn national moment is being overshadowed by political conflict and division.

In the face of this tension, we must ask: Where is the Church?

President Lungu was not just a political leader—he was a man of faith, known for his close relationship with the Church. Throughout his presidency, he openly leaned on the Church for guidance, partnership, and moral support. It is only fitting that in his passing, the Church should rise up to honor him—not just in word, but in action.

Now, as this crisis unfolds, we believe that President Lungu, even in death, is looking to the Church—his Church—to help restore calm, dignity, and unity to this process. The silence from our religious leaders is not just disappointing; it is dangerous.

When moral voices fall silent, political actors—unchecked and unaccountable—can lead a nation down a dark path. We need not look far for a chilling reminder. In 1994, Rwanda’s peace was shattered by political division and unchecked rhetoric. Many of those who could have spoken up stayed silent, and the result was a genocide that claimed over 800,000 lives.

Zambia has always been a peaceful, God-fearing nation—but peace must be protected. The politicians we are leaving to fight unchecked today could burn this country tomorrow, just like their ideological “twins” did in Rwanda.

We call on the Church to stand up now.
Speak peace. Call for unity. Bring both the Government and the opposition to the table. Zambia is not the property of politicians—it belongs to God and His people.

If the Church does not rise now, it may find itself trying to pray over ashes tomorrow.

Lungu’s Death Sparks Political Firestorm as PF Accuses Government of Mistreatment

Lusaka Times Editor
-
43
Lungu’s Death Sparks Political Firestorm as PF Accuses Government of Mistreatment

Lungu’s Death Sparks Political Firestorm as PF Accuses Government of Mistreatment
The death of former Zambian President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has plunged the country into a period of mourning and political tension, as Patriotic Front (PF) Secretary General Rafael Nakacinda accuses the current regime of subjecting Lungu to humiliation and obstruction that may have hastened his death. With Lungu’s remains still in South Africa, a public dispute over repatriation has erupted between the government and the late leader’s family.

Lungu died at the age of 68 in Pretoria, South Africa, where he was receiving treatment for achalasia, a condition affecting the esophagus. Zambia has declared seven days of national mourning from June 8 to 14, ordering flags at half-mast and suspending entertainment activities.

Yet behind the official solemnity lies a deep political rift. Nakacinda, who is currently in South Africa with the family, contends that Lungu’s death could have been avoided had the government not denied him medical freedom. He alleges that for years, the former president’s access to routine treatment was obstructed by politically motivated restrictions.

Nakacinda claims that after leaving office in 2021, Lungu made several unsuccessful attempts to seek medical attention abroad, often being blocked or delayed by the authorities. “In 2022, he indicated he needed to travel for his usual medical reviews,” Nakacinda recounted. “Government said they had no money, even when he offered to pay from his own resources.”

In one incident, Lungu was reportedly removed from a plane by law enforcement agents. Only in late 2024, under the watch of a visiting UN rapporteur investigating human rights conditions in Zambia, was he able to discreetly leave for South Africa. Upon arrival, doctors informed him that had he come earlier, his prognosis might have been different.

The PF alleges that the government’s current posture, leading the repatriation and funeral plans, is disingenuous and politically opportunistic. Nakacinda says the family initially planned to handle the process independently, even financing it through well-wishers, until government ministers abruptly intervened.

“The family was shocked to find Foreign Affairs Minister Mulambo Haimbe arriving and declaring the body would be taken back the next day, without prior agreement,” Nakacinda said. “They treated him like an ordinary person in life and now want to treat him like a statesman in death, to cleanse their record.”

 

He insists the family still has unanswered questions and is conducting additional procedures before the remains are returned. A postmortem has been requested to clarify the exact cause of death, amid speculative reports suggesting the possibility of poisoning an allegation Nakacinda did not confirm but said merited thorough examination.

Edgar Lungu, who served as Zambia’s sixth president from 2015 to 2021, left office following a defeat to current President Hakainde Hichilema. His post-presidency was marked by legal probes, asset seizures, and political isolation. While the government maintained it was pursuing justice, his allies viewed it as targeted persecution.

Nakacinda accuses the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) of harboring “paranoia” over a possible Lungu comeback in 2026 a speculation that, though unconfirmed, hung over much of the opposition discourse in recent years.

As the country observes national mourning, the impasse between the government and the Lungu family remains unresolved. Nakacinda warns that unless the government acknowledges its role in what he describes as Lungu’s “humiliation until death,” the situation could become a national embarrassment.

“The government is rushing to impose a seven-day mourning period,” he said. “But what if the body isn’t repatriated by then? Are they mourning a person or managing political optics?”

Lungu’s passing was expected to be a unifying moment, but it has instead spotlighted deep fractures in Zambia’s political landscape. Whether the coming days will bring reconciliation or further division depends not only on how the former president is honored, but on whether those in power are willing to confront the accusations of neglect, obstruction, and politicization leveled against them.

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

Lusaka Times Editor
-
11
Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

Edgar Lungu’s Death Should Not Be in Vain: A Call for Legal Reform and National Reflection

By Mathew Mukuluta

The passing of former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu has ignited national mourning and an equally deep constitutional debate. While the Zambian government has accorded him a state funeral with full honors, his supporters allege that his treatment in life stood in sharp contrast to this show of respect in death. The moment demands not just mourning, but an honest national reckoning with how we treat former leaders, what rights remain sacred, and how to legislate more fairly for the future.

When Edgar Lungu re-entered the political arena after his presidency, the state moved swiftly to suspend his benefits under the Benefits of Former Presidents Act, Cap 15, Section 3(3). Legally, the government was within its rights. The law clearly states that once a former president resumes active politics, their entitlements may be withdrawn. However, this legality did not soften the perception of hostility. To many Zambians, it felt like political retaliation rather than the impartial application of law.

What followed proved far more contentious. When Lungu sought medical attention abroad for a recurring condition, achalasia, he was repeatedly denied travel clearance. Despite offering to fund the trips privately, he was blocked, once even reportedly removed from a plane by state agents. This action had no constitutional grounding. Lungu was neither convicted nor on trial, and no legal basis existed to bar his movements. That decision was not just bureaucratic overreach; it was a human rights violation that placed politics above dignity, law, and life.

Years later, in late 2024, it was only the arrival of a United Nations human rights rapporteur in Zambia that allowed Lungu to leave the country without obstruction. He discreetly traveled to South Africa for treatment, only to be informed by doctors that his situation had worsened due to delays. He fought bravely, undergoing rigorous therapy, but ultimately succumbed in last week (june 2025). Had he received timely care, some specialists suggested, his fate might have been different.

In a dramatic reversal, the state has since moved to grant Lungu full honors, declaring a seven-day national mourning period and organizing a state funeral. This is entirely within the law. Once a former president passes away, political activity ceases, and all entitlements are automatically restored. Yet the about-face has left many, including Lungu’s family and the Patriotic Front, feeling bitter. They argue that the government’s eagerness to lead the funeral is a political cleanup, not a genuine gesture of respect.

This tension has led to a standoff. Lungu’s remains remain in South Africa, with his family questioning both the circumstances of his death and the government’s role in managing his repatriation. Rumors of medical neglect, and even poisoning, have surfaced, prompting calls for independent examinations. While no official cause beyond his preexisting condition has been confirmed, the family’s demand for transparency is reasonable, not political.

Still, this delicate moment must not spiral into partisan acrimony. The Lungu family, despite their justified grievances, may find healing in allowing the state to facilitate a respectful national farewell. Meanwhile, the government must confront its past actions with humility. A sincere public apology, not for political optics, but for wrongfully restricting Lungu’s fundamental right to medical care, could go a long way in mending national wounds.

More importantly, this episode should spur legal reform. Zambia must craft clearer laws governing how former presidents are treated if they return to politics. All-or-nothing policies that strip them of critical protections, including healthcare and travel rights, are too blunt and too dangerous. A refined legal framework one that distinguishes political engagement from vindictive retaliation, is urgently needed.

The death of Edgar Lungu is a moment of national sorrow, but it is also a moment of national instruction. It teaches us that even in political rivalry, dignity must prevail. That justice must be tempered with compassion. And that legal clarity is not a luxury it is a safeguard for democracy.

As Zambia moves forward, may its leaders, on all sides, rise to the occasion. Let this be a chapter not just of grief, but of wisdom. Let the late President Lungu’s story be the catalyst for a fairer, more humane Zambia.

Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism

Lusaka Times Editor
-
8
Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism


Presidential Praise Not a Priority: Hamasaka Urges Focus Amid Opposition Criticism

Clayson Hamasaka, a senior government official, has pushed back against sustained criticism from Zambia’s opposition, stating that the ruling party remains undeterred by political attacks and is focused on delivering national development. He argued that achievements such as free education and new mine openings speak for themselves, even in the absence of praise from opponents.

In a political climate often defined by opposition criticism and ruling party defense, Hamasaka’s comments underscore the growing chasm between Zambia’s major political blocs. “You do not expect the opposition to praise the president,” he said. “Actually, they are condemning free education. They say we have compromised education quality.”

This dynamic, he argues, reveals a contradiction: programs that directly benefit citizens are being politicized rather than debated constructively. “If they are going to condemn free education, are they going to remove it?” he asked. “If they are condemning us for opening mines, what is their alternative?”

Hamasaka’s statements come as the government defends several high-profile reforms, including universal primary and secondary education, economic stabilization efforts, and the revival of key mining operations. While these initiatives have garnered support from international donors and development partners, the opposition has remained largely critical, arguing that implementation lacks quality, oversight, or sustainability.

Analysts say the polarized rhetoric reflects deeper systemic issues. “In Zambia, opposition tends to define itself by confrontation rather than policy alternatives,” says Dr. Loveness Silungwe, a political scientist at the University of Zambia. “This impedes constructive democratic discourse and keeps voters in a cycle of confusion and cynicism.”

The introduction of free education in 2022 was one of President Hakainde Hichilema’s landmark pledges. It aimed to eliminate school fees for primary and secondary education, thereby improving access for children from low-income families. Despite its positive impact, critics argue the policy has stretched teaching resources and compromised classroom quality.

Government officials maintain that the challenges are transitional. “Yes, there are issues, but it’s a bold step towards equitable development,” said Education Minister Douglas Syakalima during a recent press briefing. He pointed to record enrollment numbers as evidence of success.


Zambia, a major copper producer, is also working to revive stalled or underperforming mines to boost production and foreign earnings. Hamasaka sees this as a key success under the current administration, even as the opposition questions ownership structures, licensing transparency, and labor conditions.

“We’ve created jobs and increased investor confidence,” Hamasaka stressed. “But all the opposition sees is an opportunity to discredit our efforts.”

Experts argue that while skepticism is a healthy component of democracy, it must be matched by solutions. “It’s not enough to say the government is failing,” said governance expert Choolwe Mweetwa. “The opposition must offer clear policy alternative show they would do things better, not just differently.”

The current tone of political debate, marked by accusations and defensiveness, risks alienating voters who seek pragmatic leadership over rhetorical battles.

Hamasaka’s message is clear: the ruling party does not expect applause from its opponents, but it demands fair critique rooted in facts and national interest. As Zambia heads into another election cycle, the maturity of its democracy will hinge not on applause or antagonism, but on the quality and integrity of its public debate.

“Impact of Free Education Policy: Enrollment Before and After (2021–2024)”

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls – Birsek Phiri

Lusaka Times Editor
-
2
Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls – Birsek Phiri

Zambia’s Opposition Lacks Cohesion Ahead of 2026 Polls, Says Political Commentator

With less than a year to Zambia’s 2026 general elections, political analyst Birsek Phiri has raised concerns over the apparent disarray and lack of constructive engagement within the opposition, warning that the nation risks losing focus on critical governance issues if political players prioritize power over national interest.

As Zambia edges closer to the 2026 general elections, a familiar refrain is echoing across political discourse: the opposition appears more preoccupied with criticizing the ruling party than offering viable alternatives. Birsek Phiri, a respected political commentator, argues that this dynamic reflects a deeper weakness in the political system one where opposition parties engage more in antagonism than in articulating sound policy visions.

“When you look at the opposition itself, they are not very strong,” Phiri remarked, noting that despite the proximity to the polls, there is still no clear opposition figure rallying national momentum. “We are less than a year away, and it is not yet clear who the opposition can put forward as a viable candidate.”

Phiri emphasized the need for the opposition to transcend mere opposition for its own sake. “They should be looking more in terms of what is good for this nation, not what is good for a political party in power today,” he said.

This sentiment resonates in a context where Zambia’s young democracy has often been punctuated by electoral cycles characterized by intense political rivalry, personality-driven campaigns, and populist rhetoric. Analysts say the stakes are high in 2026, not just for parties vying for power, but for Zambia’s broader trajectory on issues like economic recovery, corruption, and democratic accountability.

Zambia’s 2021 elections ushered in President Hakainde Hichilema of the United Party for National Development (UPND), ending the decade-long rule of the Patriotic Front (PF). Though the transition was peaceful and democratic, it came with expectations for swift economic revival and institutional reform. Three years on, the ruling party is under pressure to deliver on promises related to employment, economic stability, and debt restructuring.

Meanwhile, the opposition, especially the PF, is grappling with internal divisions, leadership wrangles, and allegations of impropriety. Political observers argue that the PF has struggled to regain coherence following the 2021 loss and has failed to rebrand or present a compelling alternative policy agenda.

Phiri’s comments serve as a caution to all political players, both ruling and opposition, to shift away from rhetoric that deepens division. The frequent declarations by opposition leaders vowing to “reverse” government policies if elected, he warns, risk creating a climate of instability and policy discontinuity.

“This idea of ‘when we come to power, we will change everything’ is not how a nation should function,” Phiri said. “We need continuity where necessary, and debate that is rooted in facts and national progress.”

Experts agree that Zambia’s democratic maturity depends heavily on the quality of political debate and the presence of a credible opposition. “Democracy thrives on contestation,” says political analyst Dr. Judith Mwansa of the University of Zambia, “but that contest must be issue-based. If the opposition is disorganized, citizens are deprived of meaningful choices.”

Moreover, with the global economic climate remaining uncertain and Zambia’s own fiscal reforms underway, including negotiations with the IMF and debt restructuring deals, political stability and policy clarity will be critical in attracting investment and maintaining growth.

As Zambia approaches a crucial electoral milestone, the strength of its democratic institutions will be tested not just by the ballot but by the quality of leadership and political discourse leading up to it. Phiri’s message is clear: for Zambia to progress, both ruling and opposition parties must prioritize the national interest over partisan gain.

My Walk With Edgar- Sikota

Chief Editor
-
5
My Walk With Edgar- Sikota

The loss of the Sixth Republican President Dr. Edgar Chagwa Lungu has hit every person in Zambia. The United Liberal Party, of which I am president, has already put out a message of condolences to the bereaved family, party and nation.

This piece is not a formal but individual reflection on someone I had a very long and personal relationship. It is recollections of some of the interactions I had with the dearly departed Edgar Chagwa Lungu .

THE BEGINNING OF THE WALK WITH EDGAR

I first came across sixth Republican President Edgar Chagwa Lungu in 1982 when he was still commonly called, “Edgar”.

To the end of his life I would refer to him as “Edgar” whenever we were alone or with his wife Esther. When in public or formally addressing him I would refer to him as “Your Excellency” or “Mr. President”. This is how comfortable we were with each other and how I recognized that my private relationship should only be shown when only in his presence or that of his wife.

His accepting me to call him Edgar in private also shows that the title of President did not go to his head and he realized that it is not the title but how you interact with people that makes you what you are.

Riches and fame cannot surpass a good soul. What he had in abundance was a good soul.

I first got acquainted with Edgar in 1982 when he was a learner Legal Practitioner at the Law Practice Institute and I was lecturing at the National Institute of Public Administration.

He was jovial and easy going making it easy for him to strike up friendships. What was also clear was that he had a very sharp mind.

When he was in the legal department of ZCCM and I was with then Chilanga and Company he would let us have some legal instructions from the mining conglomerate.

When he was contemplating stopping being in house counsel and going into private practice he asked me what I thought as I had been in private practice since 1983. I encouraged him to take the plunge which he did and joined Andrea Masiye and Co.

In 1995 I went with Edgar and also Late a Josephine Nyirongo, the then Treasurer of the Law Association of Zambia, on a seven week program in six different States in the USA to work in various different types of State legal aid systems. Edgar was a stand out participant during our tour. Edgar was already my friend but that seven weeks of close daily (and nightly) interaction cemented our bond even further.

In 1996 Edgar asked me to help him campaign in the Chawama Constituency election where he stood as an independent candidate. I donated a very modest sum to his campaign and once or twice actually went out on the stomp with him in Chawama.

Edgar therefore gave me my first taste of politics by inviting me to be part of his campaign. It was also his first. It was an impressive baptism as he came in second to soon to become Vice President Christon Tembo.

This result was impressive when you took into account that he was the only independent in a field of five candidates where all his opponents were sponsored by political parties.

He managed to get 20% of the vote compared to Christon Tembo’s 55% because of how he easily interacted with the constituents. As one of his foot soldiers i observed how he walked through Chawama casually chatting with the voters he came across.

After this I got the feel for active politics and got involved in the formation of the United Party For National Development (UPND) in 1998. I was the UPND’s first Legal Chairman. I called upon Edgar and invited him to be in the legal subcommittee of UPND that I formed. He therefore agreed to be a committee member in the committee his Chawama campaign foot soldier (Saki) chaired.

As we went towards the 2001 election the elections committee of UPND decided to adopt someone else as the candidate despite of the work Edgar had done in Chawama. Edgar at the last minute stood as an independent but did not do as expected due to his late entry into the race.

After the Gabon football disaster I got instructions to represent the families of the fallen football heroes. It was a large number of people to deal with. I asked if he would be interested to take on the case together with me and he accepted.

I am glad he accepted because any lawyer will tell you that class action suits are the hardest to manage and run. His people and communication skills came in very handy to a very volatile set of clients. The majority were fine but the very vocal minority needed the tact and skill of Edgar to manage.

There would be immense drama and Edgar would manage to handle the unruly ones amongst them. One day a small number of the group brought a small coffin and left it at our offices.

Edgar said we could turn this spiteful act into a source of relief for someone. Edgar learnt of an indigent family who had lost a child and suggested we donate it to them. We did and this simple act by Edgar eased the burden for a grieving family. Edgar took ‘making lemonade out of lemons’ to a brand new higher level.

We were both operating from the city centre which was increasingly not conducive to business as parking was a headache and petty crime was spiraling. I decided to seek offices out of town and found flats at Addis Ababa Drive around about that were being sold.

I invited Edgar and four other law firms to join me in acquiring the property and moving out of Cairo Road. We formed a special vehicle company to acquire the building and have punctured the myth thatZambians cannot work in partnership together. Mr. Masiye, Speaker Nellie Mutti, Sixth Republican President and myself have been together for over years.

Clearly Edgar was someone willing to work with others. When he went into government and thought he would not have enough time to attend to the property company we formed, Edgar gave me power of attorney limited to the affairs of the property.

Over the years he was comfortable to just receive reports as to what was happening in the company. This showed he had faith in humanity and did not feel only he had the answers.

When I lost my father Edgar dealt with the settlement of dads estate as he was already known by my father and my siblings. He provided the legal service on the basis of being practically family.

In the 2016 Petition Edgar asked me to be in his legal team because we had worked together on different cases over the ages and he was comfortable that he would get commitment and professionalism. What was good about working for him as his lawyers is that although he was a very intelligent lawyer (who graduated with a merit from UNZA) he did not pretend to be a know it all but, he listened to his lawyers advise.

When the Dan Pule and three others eligibility case was commenced Edgar felt comfortable to give me instructions to be in his legal team for the same.

Inspite of Edgar being head of State at the time of the case, it was clear that he did not put any pressure on the judges presiding on the case as he genuinely did not know in what direction they would rule.

UKA was an idea centered on bringing like minded opposition parties to work together. From the time Edgar came back into active politics he made this his passionate dedication and desire. He therefore linked up with Chishala Kateka and late Edith Nawakwi who were of a similar view and desire.

Chishala and Late Edith had both separately discussed the idea of opposition unity but did not let out that Edgar was part of the scheme. Infact when Chishala first approached me in March 2022 Edgar was in retirement and had not come back to active politics.

The first formal meeting when the original UKA members met was at late Edith Nawakwi’s residence. Edgar, although acknowledged by all of us as being of a different status to us insisted that we feel free to interact with him without holding back simply because he was a former President.

Some took this to be open liscence and we had a constant struggle to try to keep some in proper line. Edgar was willing to give us room to try and counsel and guide some of our colleagues.

Edgar initially showed tolerance towards some who spoke out of turn and allowed us to try and counsel them. Edgar was very accommodating and tolerant but at some stage he felt he could no longer take what he referred to as “the little girl”. We tried our best to counsel the”little girl” but this proved very difficult. On this task I must admit that I failed Edgar on the mission of mellowing certain characters; not from lack of trying but because of dealing with one or two very complex characters.

The day before Edgar left for South Africa I had agreed with him that we would meet to discuss the happenings in PF, TONSE and UKA. He told me he would be going to the airport for a flight to South Africa to try and get some treatment. What is striking is that he said to me, “I know the State will not allow me to board the plane and leave as they always do, so I will drop in to see you on my way back from the airport after they turn me back.

Edgar thought they would scuttle his trip out for his medical as they always did but, his team managed to outsmart the State machinery and he slipped out of the country. It was however too late for the doctors to do a full remedial job to restore his health.

This was the last interaction I had in the walk with Edgar my friend, professional colleague, co counsel, lawyer, client, family friend, candidate I was foot soldier for, business partner, principal who gave me Power of Attorney, recruit into UPND, committee member in my sub committee, the person who nominated me to chair the UKA project, advisor; but most of all MY PRESIDENT.

In the end it is inescapable that, as Edgar leaves me and all of us and walks away to our Lord in Heaven, Edgar is still PRESIDENT.

MAY HIS EXCELLENCY DR. EDGAR CHAGWA LUNGU FINALLY BE ALLOWED TO REST IN PEACE

Mourn President Lungu With Dignity- Kavindele

Chief Editor
-
5
Mourn President Lungu With Dignity- Kavindele

Former Vice President Enoch Kavindele has urged Zambians to mourn the late former President Edgar Lungu in a dignified manner.
Mr Kavindele says that the late President Lungu served his time as a leader and peacefully handed over the instruments of power to President Hakainde Hichilema, a sign that another elected leader had to govern the country.

The former Vice President condemned those politicising former President Lungu’s funeral, stating that it was wrong to claim that President Lungu was only a leader of a particular political party.

ZANIS reports that speaking after signing in the book of condolence at Belvedere Lodge in Lusaka, Mr Kavindele stated that the whole nation has lost a man who served in the office of president, hence needs to be mourned by all Zambians.

“For only a section of political parties to claim that only they should be in-charge of the funeral is very wrong, we are being denied an opportunity to mourn a former President,” Mr Kavindele said.

He noted that President Lungu’s death was sudden as the nation was not aware of his medical visit to South Africa, but only to be informed of his passing on June 5th 2025 is heartbreaking for the country.

Meanwhile, United Party for National Development (UPND) Media Consultant, Oliver Shalala stated that politicians should respect one another especially in such a solemn moment when the country is mourning a man who dedicated his life to politics.

Stop the WITCHCRAFT mentality; no one has killed Lungu!

Chief Editor
-
4
Stop the WITCHCRAFT mentality; no one has killed Lungu!

We are quite reluctant to comment on the ongoing debate…..nay the drama surrounding the demise of 6th Republican President Edgar Lungu as we are still mourning the loss of our beloved mom.

However, after countlessly watching several individuals, be it high profile or ‘kabwangas’ (ordinary individuals) on Social Media and TV shamelessly put their warped reasoning and ignorance on display or indeed desperately try to score cheap political mileage from ba Lungu’s demise, we are left with little or no choice but share our humble opinion.

In our villages, most unfortunately, once death comes knocking on our doors, it doesn’t matter whether it’s HIV/AIDS that has consumed us or not, we immediately start searching for the nearest “granny” in the neighborhood and label them as witches responsibile for the death of our beloved ones! Punishment in such instances usually comes in the form of being ostracized from the rest of the community or capitalpunishment! Readers may be keen to learn that recently, an enraged mob descended on a home of an octogenarian, long accused of being a wizard, and savagely dismembered her body using primitive weapons after which they set her remains ablaze!

Unfortunately, such kind of behaviour or reasoning isn’t restricted to those in the villages…..even the elite….the so-called educated….including the clergy are still stuck with such backward witchcraft mentality! We can boast of a chain of degrees to our names…. put on costly designer outfits, drive fancy vehicles and live in mansions, but in reality still remain uncivilized…..savages at heart eagerly waiting for the best opportunity to cause harm to others.

Consider the conduct of members of the Patriotic Front in the recent days…..these are not ordinary folks from Chibolya compound, but highly educated individuals – academicians, lawyers, pastors and former cabinet ministers hell-bent on leading the crusade to point accusing fingers at those in government. Are they any better than those in the village?

When your time is up, it’s up bwana; none of us can dare escape death whether we are able to enjoy the luxury of the best medical facilities on earth or not. We shall give a few examples…. Levy Mwanawasa, our third Republican President was evacuated to France to be seen by some of the best surgeons, did he make it? Equally, when the condition of our 5th President, Micheal Sata, went on a downward spiral, he was whisked away to the United Kingdom, a country that undoubtedly prides itself with one of the best medical cares under the Sun, what happened next? Our founding father, Dr. Kenneth Kaunda couldn’t make it alive in South Africa either!

When PF cadres insist government must stay away from ba Lungu’s funeral, do they really understand the implications of this? Ba Lungu is former President; you obviously expect high profile dignitaries such as Presidents and former presidents etc to attend the funeral in honour of their departed colleague. Can the PF or indeed the family manage to take care of all the logistics – top-notch security, accommodation, transport etc? Can we please just stop the ‘nonsense’ and send-off the immediate past President in a dignified manner.

We rest our case…..

Prince Bill M Kaping’a
Political/Social Analyst
Zambezi

Hardened to Difficulties

Chief Editor
-
1
Hardened to Difficulties

Today’s Scripture

I will strengthen and harden you to difficulties, yes, I will help you.
Isaiah 41:10, AMPC

Hardened to Difficulties

Friend, if twenty years ago you faced some of the difficulties you face today, they would have defeated you. God knows what you can handle. As you keep passing these tests, He’s hardening you to difficulty. You’re getting stronger. Your faith is growing. Your endurance is increasing. Your spiritual muscles are being built up. The reason God is doing this is because there are awesome things in your future. God is taking you to a wide and spacious place. He’s going to enlarge your territories. But with greater influence comes greater giants. With greater blessings comes greater opposition. With greater favor comes greater persecution. If He didn’t harden you to difficulty, you couldn’t withstand what comes against you.

You may be going through some things today that aren’t fun. You may be uncomfortable, but you have to realize that God is not making you suffer. He’s working through the difficulty to deposit something inside you. He’s growing you up, getting you stronger, increasing your faith. Be encouraged that everything you are going through is necessary for where God is taking you.

A Prayer for Today

“Father, thank You that Your hand has been upon my life in so many ways, hardening me to difficulties, getting me stronger, growing me up. Thank You that You are making deposits in my life to help me withstand the enemy. I believe that You are preparing me for where You’re taking me. In Jesus’ Name, Amen.”

Zambia Declares Seven Days of National Mourning for Late Former President Edgar Lungu

Chief Editor
-
11
Zambia Declares Seven Days of National Mourning for Late Former President Edgar Lungu

President Hakainde Hichilema has declared a seven-day period of national mourning to honour the late former President Edgar Chagwa Lungu, who passed away in South Africa on Thursday, June 5, 2025. The mourning period will begin on Sunday, June 8, and run through Saturday, June 14, 2025.

In a press briefing Secretary to the Cabinet Patrick Kangwa confirmed that the Government of the Republic of Zambia has accorded Mr. Lungu a state funeral, in accordance with national protocol and in recognition of his service as the country’s sixth President.

Mr. Kangwa informed the public that the government has been in consultation with the Lungu family and relevant stakeholders to coordinate funeral arrangements. The late President’s body is expected to arrive in Zambia on Wednesday, June 11, 2025.

The official funeral gathering will take place at Belvedere Lodge along Leopards Hill Road in Kabulonga, Lusaka.

“As a mark of respect, all entertainment activities should be postponed or cancelled during the mourning period, and national flags will be flown at half-mast from 06:00 hours to 18:00 daily,” said Mr. Kangwa.

President Hichilema’s declaration of national mourning is in line with guidelines for honouring former Heads of State and is meant to acknowledge Mr. Lungu’s contributions to the nation during his time in office.

Further details regarding the state funeral and burial arrangements will be communicated in due course.

123...5,637Page 2 of 5,637

Company

Trending

Categories

© Lusaka Times